Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Preferential Tariffs

  • Laura Huici SanchoEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_379

Abstract

Tariff preferences refer to measures that involve tariff reductions which benefit certain goods originating in certain countries. Historically tariff preferences were agreed on a reciprocal basis to recognize special relations between states. The multilateralization of trade implied the generalization of preferences, which become an instrument for development cooperation. Tariff preferences might be accorded, unilaterally or through regional agreement schemes, to developing countries. However the progressive reduction of tariffs in international trade limits the role of tariff preferences as an instrument to agree a special treatment to certain kind of countries. Besides the increasing diversity of states requires of flexible instruments that allow special and differential treatment to better adapt to development, financial and trade needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Monographs Google Scholar
  2. Grilli ER (1994) The European community and the developing countries. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Journal Articles Google Scholar
  4. Bartels L (2007) The WTO legality of the EU’s GSP+ arrangement. J Int Econ Law 10(4):869–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartels L, Häberli C (2010) Binding tariff preferences for developing countries under Article II GATT. J Int Econ Law 13(4):969–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clute RE, Wilson RR (1958) The commonwealth and the favored-nation usage. Am J Int Law 52:455–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feis H (1945–1946) The future of British imperial preferences. Foreign Aff 661: 661–674Google Scholar
  8. Kennedy KC (2012) The generalized system of preferences after four decades: conditionality and the shrinking margin or preference. Mich State Int Law Rev 20:521–668Google Scholar
  9. Kishore P (2011) Conditionalities in the generalized system of preferences as instruments of global economic governance. Int Lawyer 45:895–902Google Scholar
  10. Lavopa F, Dalle D (2012) “¿Hay vida después del SGP? Implicancias de la posible exclusión de Argentina de los sistemas generalizados de preferencias de Estados Unidos y la Unión Europea”, Cátedra OMC FLACSO Argentina, August 2012. Available at: http://catedraomc.flacso.org.ar/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Anexo-1_SGP.pdf
  11. Persson M (2012) From trade preferences to trade facilitation: taking stock of the issues. Econ Open Access-Open Assess E-J 6:1–33Google Scholar
  12. Turksen U (2009) The WTO law and the EC’s GSP+ arrangement. J World Trade 43(5):927–968Google Scholar
  13. Wardhaugh B (2013) GSP+ and human rights: is the EU’s approach the right one? J Int Econ Law 16:827–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Monographs Google Scholar
  2. Hoekman B, Özden Ç (2006) Trade preferences and differential treatment of developing countries. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, NorthamptonGoogle Scholar
  3. Journal Articles Google Scholar
  4. Bartels L (2003) The WTO enabling clause and positive conditionality in the European community’s GSP program. J Int Econ Law 6(2):507–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Breda Dos Santos N, Farias R, Cunha R (2005) Generalized system of preferences in General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization: history and current issues. J World Trade 39(4):637–670Google Scholar
  6. Charnovitz S, Bartels L, Howse R, Bradley J, Pauwelyn J, Regan D (2004) The Appellate Body’s GSP decision. World Trade Rev 3(2):239–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernandez-Pons X, Lavopa F (2014) ¿Ojo por ojo, diente por diente? Trazando los límites de las contramedidas comerciales en el marco del Derecho de la OMC. In: Linares D, Luciano M. (Coord.): Controversias en la Organización Mundial del Comercio. Protagonismo y estrategias de los países en desarrollo. Editorial FLACSO Argentina – Teseo, Buenos Aires, pp 233–299Google Scholar
  8. Grossman GM, Sykes AO (2005) A preference for development: the law and economics of GSP. World Trade Rev 4(1):41–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hofmann G (1971) Les préférences tarifaires généralisées. Cah de Dr Eur 6:641–661Google Scholar
  10. Howse R (2003) India’s WTO challenge to drug enforcement conditions in the European community generalized system of preferences: a little known case with major repercussions for ‘Political’ conditionality in US trade policy. Chic J Int Law 4:385Google Scholar
  11. Huici-Sancho L (2006) What kind of ‘Generalized’ systems of preferences? Eur J Law Econ 21:267–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Inama S (2011) The reform of the EC GSP rules of origin: per aspera ad astra? J World Trade 45(3):577–603Google Scholar
  13. Inama S (2003) Trade preferences and the WTO negotiations on market access – battling for compensation of erosion of GSP, ACP and other trade preferences or assessing and improving their utilization and value by addressing rules of origin and graduation? J World Trade 37(5):959–976Google Scholar
  14. Irish M (2007) GSP tariffs and conditionality: a comment on EC–Preferences. J World Trade 41(4):683–698Google Scholar
  15. Khorana S, Yeung MT, Kerr WA, Perdikis N (2012) The battle over the EU’s proposed humanitarian trade preferences for Pakistan: a case study in multifaceted protectionism. J World Trade 46(1):33–59Google Scholar
  16. López-Jurado C (2011) La oferta comercial preferencial de la Union europea a los países en vías de desarrollo: modalidades e interacciones. Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo 39:443–483Google Scholar
  17. Manero-Salvador A (2007) El SGP+ como elemento de la cooperación entre Europa y América Latina. Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana 1(1). Available at: http://www.urjc.es/ceib/investigacion/publicaciones/REIB_01_A_Manero_Salvador.pdf
  18. Metzger SD (1967) UNCTAD, developments in the law and institutions of international economic relations. Am J Int Law 61:756–775Google Scholar
  19. Ochieng C, Milton O (2007) The EU–ACP economic partnership agreements and the ‘Development Question’: constraints and opportunities posed by article XXIV and special and differential treatment provisions of the WTO. J Int Econ Law 10(2):363–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pauwelyn J (2013) The end of differential treatment for developing countries? Lessons from the trade and climate change regimes. Rev Eur Int Environ Law 22:29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shaffer G, Apea Y (2005) Institutional choice in the generalized system of preferences case: who decides the conditions for trade preferences? The law and politics of rights. J World Trade 39(6):977–1008Google Scholar
  22. Yusuf AA (1980) Differential and more favourable treatment: the GATT enabling clause. J World Trade Law 14(6):488–507Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International Law and EconomicsUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain