Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Political Competition

  • Anna Laura BaraldiEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_365

Abstract

In this entry, we tried to explain the role of political competition in the economy. Political science provided various definitions of political competition. After analyzing in detail all of those, we mentioned the actors political competition involves. In economic terms, competition in political market has seen as competition in good market. Therefore, economic science studied if this kind of competition is good or bad in terms of economic variables as, for example, growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Acemoglu D, Robinson J (2000) Political losers as a barrier to economic development. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 90:126–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D, Robinson J (2002) Economic backwardness in political perspective. NBER working paper no. 8831Google Scholar
  3. Alfano MR, Baraldi A L (2012) Is there an optimal level of political competition in terms of economic growth? Evidence from Italy. Eur J Law Econ, on line first.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-012-9340-5
  4. Bardhan P, Mookherjee D (2006) Corruption and decentralization of infrastructure delivery in developing countries. Econ J 116:101–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bardhan P, Yang T (2004) Political competition in economic perspective, Department of economics, UCB. Department of Economics, UCB, UC Berkeley. Retrieved from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1907c39n
  6. Becker G (1983) A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Q J Econ 98:371–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Besley T, Case A (1995) Incumbent behavior: vote-seeking, tax- setting, and yardstick competition. Am Econ Rev 85(1):25–45Google Scholar
  8. Besley T, Case A (2003) Political institutions and policy choices: evidence from the United States. J Econ Lit 41(1):7–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Besley T, Persson T, Sturm D (2010) Political competition and economic performance: theory and evidence from the United States. Rev Econ Stud 77:1329–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buchanan J, Wagner R (1977) Democracy in deficit: the political legacy of Lord Keynes. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Cox GW (1997) Making votes count: strategic coordination in the world’s electoral systems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Damania R, Yalcin E (2005) Corruption and political competition. World Bank, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  13. De Winter L, Dumont P (2003) Luxembourg: stable coalitions in a pivotal party system. In: Strøm K, Müller WC, Bergman T (eds) Coalition governance in western Europe. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Drazen A (2001) The political economy of macroeconomics. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  15. Duverger M (1954) Political parties: their organization and activity in the modern state. Wiley, London/Methuen/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Grofman B, Selb P (2009) A fully general index of political competition. Elect Stud 28(2):291–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holbrook TM, Van Dunk E (1993) Electoral competition in the American States. Am Polit Sci Rev 87(4):955–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lijphart A (1994) Electoral systems and party systems: a study of twenty- seven democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lijphart A (1999) Patterns of democracy. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  20. Lipford J, Yandle B (1990) Exploring dominant state governments. J Inst Theor Econ 146(4):561–575Google Scholar
  21. Lipset S, Rokkan S (1967) Party systems and voter alignments: cross-national perspectives. The Free Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  22. Lizzeri A, Persico N (2005) A drawback of electoral competition. J Eur Econ Assoc 3:1318–1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marshall A (1890) Principles of economics, vol 1, 1st edn. London, Macmillan. Retrieved 07 Dec 2012Google Scholar
  24. Mueller D, Murrel P (1986) Interest groups and the size of the government. Public Choice 48:125–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Müller WC, Strøm K (2003) Coalition government in western Europe. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Mulligan C, Tsui K (2006) Political competitiveness. NBER working paper no. 12653, OctGoogle Scholar
  27. Padovano F, Ricciuti R (2009) Political competition and economic performance: evidence from the Italian regions. Public Choice 138:263–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Persson T, Tabellini G (2000) Political economics: explaining economic policy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  29. Persson T, Roland G, Tabellini G (1997) Separation of powers and political accountability. Q J Econ 112(4):1163–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pinto PM, Timmons JF (2005) The political determinants of economic performance. Political competition and the sources of growth. Comp Polit Stud 38:26–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Polo M (1998) Electoral competition and political rents. IGIER, Bocconi University, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  32. Rodden J, Rose-Ackerman S (1997) Does federalism preserve markets? Virginia Law Rev 83(7):1521–1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rogers D, Rogers J (2000) Political competition and state government size: do tighter elections produce looser budgets? Public Choice 105:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sartori G (1976) Parties and party systems: a framework for analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Skilling D, Zeckhauser K (2002) Political competition and debt trajectories in Japan and the OECD. Jpn World Econ 14:121–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stigler G (1972) Economic competition and political competition. Public Choice 13:91–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Taagepera R, Shugart MS (1989) Seats and votes: the effects and determinants of electoral systems. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Roozendaal P (1997) Government survival in western multi-party democracies: the effect of credible threats via dominance. Eur J Polit Res 32(1):71–92Google Scholar
  39. Vanhanen T (2000) A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1810–1998. J Peace Res 37(2):251–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vanhanen T (2003) Democratization: a comparative analysis of 170 countries. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsSecond University of NaplesCapuaItaly