Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Merger Control

  • Tim ReuterEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_320

Abstract

Merger control is at the heart of competition law institutions throughout the world. Firms, before they complete a merger or an acquisition, are required to get the transaction approved by competition authorities. The objectives of merger control, limiting the accrual of market power and protecting the welfare-generating competition forces of the market, are well in line with economic theory. Economic theory has identified several types of effects that can arise from a merger, in particular unilateral and coordinated horizontal effects that result from an elimination of competition between firms supplying substitutable goods, and non-horizontal and conglomerate effects that result if firms are active on vertically or otherwise linked markets. We discuss the reasoning behind these effects and how they are assessed by competition authorities. We also discuss market definition as a first step in the assessment of mergers and the legal framework under which mergers are controlled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Botteman Y (2006) Mergers, standard of proof and expert economic evidence. J Compet Law Econ 2(1):71–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brouwer M (2008) Horizontal mergers and efficiencies; theory and anti trust practice. Eur J Law Econ 26(1):11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Budzinski O, Ruhmer I (2009) Merger simulation in competition policy: a survey. J Compet Law Econ 6(2):277–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coate MB (2012) The use of natural experiments in merger analysis. J Antitrust Enforc 1(2):437–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission (1997) Non-horizontal merger guidelines, https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/atr/legacy/2006/05/18/2614.pdf
  6. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission (2010) Horizontal merger guidelines, https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/merger-review/100819hmg.pdf
  7. European Commission (1997) Commission notice on the definition of the relevant market for the purposes of community competition law. Off J Eur Union C 372:155–163Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (2004) Guidelines on the assessment of horizontal mergers under the council regulation on the control of concentrations between undertakings. Off J Eur Union C 31:5–18Google Scholar
  9. European Commission (2008) Guidelines on the assessment of non-horizontal mergers under the council regulation on the control of concentrations between undertakings. Off J Eur Union C 265:6–25Google Scholar
  10. European Commission (2016) Recent developments in telecoms mergers. Compet Merger Brief 3(2016):1–8Google Scholar
  11. Farrell J, Shapiro C (2010) Antitrust evaluation of horizontal mergers: an economic alternative to market definition. BE J Theor Econ Pol Perspect 10(1), Article 9Google Scholar
  12. Friedman J (1971) A non-cooperative equilibrium for Supergames. Rev Econ Stud 38(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gore D, Lewis S, Lofaro A, Dethmers F (2013) The economic assessment of mergers under European competition law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaplow L (2010) Why (Ever) define markets? Harv Law Rev 124:437–440Google Scholar
  15. Williamson O (1968) Economics as an anti-trust defense: the welfare trade-offs. Am Econ Rev 58(1):18–36Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RBB EconomicsBrusselsBelgium