Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Legislative Television

  • Franklin G. MixonJr.Email author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_296

Abstract

Seminal studies describe legislative television as an advancement in political information technology that is used by incumbent legislators for protection against political challengers. Today, legislative television spans much of the globe, creating both intra- and international differences that have made the study of the impact of legislative television on the political process something akin to a natural experiment. This entry discusses some of the studies that make up this branch of the law and economics literature, with particular focus on how the presence of television in a legislature impacts turnover rates, session lengths and the popularity of various parliamentary procedures.

Definition

Legislative Television refers to the televising, either in real time or on a tape-delayed basis, of a government’s (local, regional, or national) legislative process.

Televising Legislatures in the U.S. and Beyond

In a study whose primary focus is notthe televising of legislatures or...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Cowen T (2000) What price fame? Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Crain WM, Goff BL (1986) Televising legislatures: an economic analysis. J Law Econ 29:405–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crain WM, Goff BL (1988) Televised legislatures: political information technology and public choice. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Greene KV (1991) The nature of political services, legislative turnover and television. Public Choice 70:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kimenyi MS, Tollison RD (1995) The length of legislative sessions and the growth of government. Ration Soc 7:151–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mixon FG Jr (2002) Does legislative television alter the relationship between voters and politicians? Ration Soc 14:109–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mixon FG Jr, Upadhyaya KP (2002) Legislative television as an institutional entry barrier: the impact of C-SPAN2 on turnover in the U.S. Senate, 1946–1998. Public Choice 112:433–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mixon FG Jr, Upadhyaya KP (2003) Legislative television as political advertising: a public choice approach. iUniverse, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Mixon FG Jr, Hobson DL, Upadhyaya KP (2001) Gavel-to-gavel congressional television coverage as political advertising: the impact of C-SPAN on legislative sessions. Econ Inquiry 39:351–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mixon FG Jr, Gibson MT, Upadhyaya KP (2003) Has legislative television changed legislator behavior? C-SPAN2 and the frequency of Senate filibustering. Public Choice 115:139–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nelson P (1970) Information and consumer behavior. J Pol Econ 77:311–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nelson P (1974) Advertising and information. J Pol Econ 81:729–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nelson P (1976) Political information. J Law Econ 19:315–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Soroka SN, Resko O, Albaugh Q (2015) Television in the legislature: the impact of cameras in the House of Commons. Parliam Aff 68:203–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stigler GJ (1961) The economics of information. J Pol Econ 68:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Telser L (1976) Political information: comment. J Law Econ 19:337–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tyrone JM, Mixon FG Jr, Treviño LJ, Minto TC (2003) Politics and the adoption of legislative television: an analysis of the U.S. House vote on C-SPAN. Eur J Law Econ 16:345–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Economic EducationColumbus State UniversityColumbusUSA