Ideas and Ideation

  • Mark A. RuncoEmail author
  • Garrett Jaeger
Living reference work entry



Ideas are meaningful units of thought. In fact, they represent the most useful unit of thought. There is no way to pinpoint some of the dimensions of ideas since they vary so much (e.g., your idea of “a good time” is probably more complex than your idea of “your favorite color”), but this is in fact part of their utility. They can be defined such that the variation and broad usage are retained. Ideas are smaller than concepts, which are also varied but cover entire categories of thought (e.g., “funny movies”). Ideas can be quite precise. They are the smallest meaningful unit of thought.

Ideas often make themselves known to the individual (in consciousness) in a verbal form, but it would be a huge mistake to see them as necessarily verbal. Ideas occur in all modalities and perhaps in all domains (e.g., music, mathematics). It is typical to think about ideas in some verbal form, but that is just...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Beketayev K, Runco MA. Scoring divergent thinking tests with a semantics-based algorithm. Eur J Psychol. 2016;12(2):210–20. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v12i2.1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Binet A, Simon T. The development of intelligence in children. Ann Knee Psychol. 1905;11:163–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Guilford JP. Some changes in the structure-of-intellect model. Educ Psychol Meas. 1988;48(1):1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Locke J. An essay concerning human understanding. New York: Dover; 1959. (Original work published in 1690).Google Scholar
  5. Mednick SA. The associative basis of the creative process. Psychol Rev. 1962;69:220–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mednick SA, Mednick MT. Examiner’s manual: remote associates test. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1967.Google Scholar
  7. Plato. The Republic (trans: Grube GMA, Reeve CDC). In: Cooper JM, Hutchinson DS, editors. Plato: complete works. Indianapolis: Hackett; 1997. p. 971–1223. (Original work published in 380 B.C.)Google Scholar
  8. Plucker JA, Runco MA, Lim W. Predicting ideational behavior from divergent thinking and discretionary time on task. Creat Res J. 2006;18:55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Runco MA, editor. Divergent thinking. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation; 1991.Google Scholar
  10. Runco MA. Commentary: divergent thinking is not synonymous with creativity. Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts. 2008;2(2):93–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Runco MA, editor. Divergent thinking and creative potential, vol. 2. Cresskill: Hampton Press; 2012.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GeorgiaVistaUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Igor N. Dubina
    • 1
  1. 1.Economic Information SystemsAltai State UniversityBarnaulRussia