Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining

2014 Edition
| Editors: Reda Alhajj, Jon Rokne

Siena: Statistical Modeling of Longitudinal Network Data

  • Tom A. B. Snijders
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_312

Synonyms

Glossary

Network Panel Data

Longitudinal data consisting of two or more repeated observations of a network on a given set of nodes

Panel Wave

The data observed for one given observation moment in a panel study

Social Actors

Individuals, companies, etc., represented by the nodes in the network

Stochastic Actor-Oriented Model

A probability model for network dynamics where changes may take place at arbitrary moments in continuous time and where these changes are regarded as consequences of choices made by the actors

RSiena

R package implementing statistical inference according to a stochastic actor-oriented model given network panel data

Effects

Model components defining the probabilities of tie changes in the stochastic actor-oriented model

Method of Moments

One of the traditional methods in statistics for parameter estimation

Dependent Variable

The variable...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Berardo R, Scholz JT (2010) Self-organizing policy networks: risk, partner selection and cooperation in estuaries. Am J Pol Sci 54:632–649Google Scholar
  2. Chen HF (2002) Stochastic approximation and its applications. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. de la Haye K, Robins G, Mohr P, Wilson C (2011) Homophily and contagion as explanations for weight similarities among adolescent friends. J Adolesc Health 49:421–427Google Scholar
  4. Holland PW, Leinhardt S (1977) A dynamic model for social networks. J Math Sociol 5:5–20zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Koskinen JH, Snijders TAB (2007) Bayesian inference for dynamic social network data. J Stat Plann Inference 13:3930–3938MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Leenders R (1995) Models for network dynamics: a Markovian framework. J Math Sociol 20:1–21zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Lewis K, Gonzalez M, Kaufman J (2012) Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(1):68–72Google Scholar
  8. Lospinoso JA (2012) Statistical models for social network dynamics. DPhil Thesis, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Lospinoso JA, Schweinberger M, Snijders TAB, Ripley RM (2011) Assessing and accounting for time heterogeneity in stochastic actor oriented models. Adv Data Anal Comput 5:147–176zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Mercken L, Snijders TAB, Steglich CEG, de Vries H (2009) Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior: social network analyses in six European countries. Soc Sci Med 69:1506–1514Google Scholar
  11. Norris JR (1997) Markov chains. Cambridge University Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Ripley RM, Snijders TAB, Preciado P (2013) Manual for Siena version 4.0. Tech. rep. University of Oxford, Department of Statistics; Nuffield College, Oxford. http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/siena/. Accessed 28 May 2013
  13. Robbins H, Monro S (1951) A stochastic approximation method. Ann Math Stat 22(3):400–407zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Schweinberger M (2012) Statistical modeling of network panel data: goodness-of-fit. Br J Stat Math Psychol 65:263–281MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Selfhout-Van Zalk MHW, Burk W, Branje SJT, Denissen J, van Aken M, Meeus WHJ (2010) Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and big five personality traits: a social network approach. J Pers 78:509–538Google Scholar
  16. Snijders TAB (1995) Methods for longitudinal social network data: review and Markov process models. In: Tiit E, Kollo T, Niemi H (eds) New trends in probability and statistics. Vol. 3: multivariate statistics and matrices in statistics. In: Proceedings of the 5th Tartu conference, TEV Vilnius, Lithuania, pp 211–227Google Scholar
  17. Snijders TAB (1996) Stochastic actor-oriented dynamic network analysis. J Math Sociol 21:149–172zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Snijders TAB (2001) The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. In: Sobel ME, Becker MP (eds) Sociological methodology — 2001, vol 31. Basil Blackwell, Boston/London, pp 361–395Google Scholar
  19. Snijders TAB (2005) Models for longitudinal network data. In: Carrington P, Scott J, Wasserman S (eds) Models and methods in social network analysis, Chapter 11. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 215–247Google Scholar
  20. Snijders TAB (2009) Longitudinal methods of network analysis. In: Meyers B (ed) Encyclopedia of complexity and system science. Springer, New York/London, pp 5998–6013Google Scholar
  21. Snijders TAB, Baerveldt C (2003) A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship evolution. J Math Sociol 27:123–151zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Snijders TAB, van Duijn MAJ (1997) Simulation for statistical inference in dynamic network models. In: Conte R, Hegselmann R, Terna P (eds) Simulating social phenomena. Springer, Berlin, pp 493–512Google Scholar
  23. Snijders TAB, Steglich CEG, Schweinberger M (2007) Modeling the co-evolution of networks and behavior. In: van Montfort K, Oud H, Satorra A (eds) Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 41–71Google Scholar
  24. Snijders TAB, Koskinen JH, Schweinberger M (2010a) Maximum likelihood estimation for social network dynamics. Ann Appl Stat 4:567–588zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. Snijders TAB, van de Bunt GG, Steglich C (2010b) Introduction to actor-based models for network dynamics. Soc Netw 32:44–60Google Scholar
  26. Snijders TAB, Lomi A, Torlò V (2013) A model for the multiplex dynamics of two-mode and one-mode networks, with an application to employment preference, friendship, and advice. Soc Netw 35: 265–276Google Scholar
  27. Steglich CEG, Snijders TAB, Pearson MA (2010) Dynamic networks and behavior: separating selection from influence. Sociol Methodol 40:329–393Google Scholar
  28. van de Bunt GG (1999) Friends by choice; An actor-oriented statistical network model for friendship networks through time. Thesis Publishers, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  29. van de Bunt GG, van Duijn MAJ, Snijders TAB (1999) Friendship networks through time: an actor-oriented statistical network model. Comput Math Organ Theory 5:167–192zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Wasserman S (1979) A stochastic model for directed graphs with transition rates determined by reciprocity. In: Schuessler KF (ed) Sociological methodology. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  31. Wasserman S (1980) Analyzing social networks as stochastic processes. J Am Stat Assoc 75:280–294zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Zeggelink EP (1994) Dynamics of structure: an individual oriented approach. Soc Netw 16:295–333Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

  1. In addition to the help pages that are available as for all R packages, there is an extensive manual (Ripley et al. 2013) and a tutorial paper (Snij-ders et al. 2010b). A textbook about the Siena method and an edited volume with example applications are in preparation. The website http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/siena/ is actively maintained and contains references to the basic methodology, references to applications, R scripts, example data sets, workshop announcements, and more.
  2. For those who wish to read more about the mathematical and methodological background, a recommended sequence of readings could be Snijders (1996) as an introduction to the idea of stochastic actor-oriented models, Snijders (2001) or Snijders (2005) for the basic definition of the model for one dependent network defined as a changing digraph, and Steglich et al. (2010) for models for the dynamics of networks and behavior, which might be followed by Snijders et al. (2010a) for Maximum Likelihood estimation or Snijders et al. (2013) for models with multiple dependent networks.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom A. B. Snijders
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Statistics and Nuffield CollegeUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands