Sustainable Built Environments

Editors: Vivian Loftness, Dagmar Haase

Daylight, Indoor Illumination, and Human Behavior

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5828-9_456

Definition of the Subject

Daylight in buildings is the natural illumination experienced by the occupants of any man-made construction with openings to the outside, e.g., dwelling and workplace. The quantity and quality of daylight in buildings is continually varying due to the natural changes in sun and sky conditions from one moment to the next. These changes have components that are random (e.g., individual cloud formations), daily (i.e., progression from day to night), and seasonal (e.g., changing day length and prevailing weather patterns). For any given sky and sun condition the quantity and character of daylight in a space will depend on the size, orientation, and nature of the building apertures; the shape and aspect of the building and its surroundings; and the optical (i.e., reflective and transmissive) properties of all the surfaces comprising the building and its surroundings.

The purpose of the very earliest shelters – the forerunners of buildings – was to protect from the...

This is a preview of subscription access content, login to check access

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Baker NV, Fanchiotti A, Steemers KA (1993) Daylighting in architecture: a European reference book. James & James, London. ISBN 1-873936-21-4Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mardaljevic J, Andersen M, Roy N, Christoffersen J (2011) Daylighting metrics for residential buildings. In: CIE 27th session, Sun City, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al Marwaee M, Carter DJ (2006) A field study of tubular daylight guidance installations. Light Res Technol 38(3):241–258Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    CIBSE Guide A (2006) Environmental design. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hopkinson RG (1963) Architectural physics – lighting. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moon P, Spencer DE (1942) Illuminations from a non-uniform sky. Illum Eng 37:707–726Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Enarun D, Littlefair P (1995) Luminance models for overcast skies: assessment using measured data. Light Res Technol 27(1):53–58Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dufton AF, Beckett HE (1932) The heliodon: an instrument for demonstrating the apparent motion of the sun. J Sci Instrum 9(8):251Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ward Larson G, Shakespeare R (1998) Rendering with radiance: the art and science of lighting visualization. Morgan Kaufmann, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mardaljevic J (2004) Verification of program accuracy for illuminance modelling: assumptions, methodology and an examination of conflicting findings. Light Res Technol 36(3):217–239Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harris L (2007) Anstey’s rights of light and how to deal with them, 4th edn. RICS Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lynes JA (1979) A sequence for daylighting design. Light Res Technol 11(2):102–106Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crisp VHC, Littlefair PJ (1984) Average daylight factor prediction. In: Proceedings of national lighting conference, Cambridge. CIBSE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reinhart CF, LoVerso VRM (2010) A rules of thumb-based design sequence for diffuse daylight. Light Res Technol 42(1):7–31Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cannon-Brookes SWA (1997) Simple scale models for daylighting design: Analysis of sources of error in illuminance predictiont. Light Res Technol 29(3):135–142Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mardaljevic J (2002) Quantification of parallax errors in sky simulator domes for clear sky conditions. Light Res Technol 34(4):313–327Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mardaljevic J (1995) Validation of a lighting simulation program under real sky conditions. Light Res Technol 27(4):181–188Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mardaljevic J (2000) Daylight simulation: validation, sky models and daylight coefficients. PhD thesis, De Montfort University, LeicesterGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mardaljevic J (2001) The BRE-IDMP dataset: a new benchmark for the validation of illuminance prediction techniques. Light Res Technol 33(2):117–134Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reinhart CF, Fitz A (2006) Findings from a survey on the current use of daylight simulations in building design. Energ Buildings 38(7):824–835Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ibarra D, Reinhart CF (2009) Daylight factor simulations – how close do simulation beginners ‘really’ get? In: International Building Performance Simulation Association conference, Glasgow, Scotland, July 27–30, pp 196–203Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    BSI (2008) Lighting for buildings Code of practice for daylighting BS 8206–2. British Standards Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hunt DRG (1979) Availability of daylight. BRE Report BR21, Building Research EstablishmentGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Building Research Establishment (1985) Lighting controls and daylight use. BRE Digest 272Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Building Research Establishment. BREEAM – the BRE environmental assessment method. http://www.breeam.org. Accessed 2011
  26. 26.
    The U.S. Green Building Council. LEED: leadership in energy and environmental design. http://www.usgbc.org/LEED. Accessed 2011
  27. 27.
    Littlefair PJ (1998) Predicting lighting energy use under daylight linked lighting controls. Build Res Inf 26(4):208–222Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Clarke JA (2001) Energy simulation in building design, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Littlefair PJ (1985) The luminous efficacy of daylight: a review. Light Res Technol 17(4):162–182Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Skartveit A, Olseth JA (1992) The probability density and autocorrelation of short-term global and beam irradiance. Solar Energy 49(6):477–487Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Begemann SHA, den Beld GJ, Tenner AD (1997) Daylight, artificial light, and people in an office environment: Overview of visual and biological responses. Int J Ind Ergon 20(3):231–239Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Galasiu AD, Veitch JA (2006) Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review. Energ Buildings 38(7):728–742Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    LG7 CIBSE/SLL (2005) Lighting guide 7: office lighting. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    EWCO (2005) Annual review of working conditions in the EU: 2004–2005. Technical report, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working ConditionsGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    CIBSE (1996) Lighting Guide 3: the visual environment for display screen use, addendum 2001. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    CIBSE/SLL (2002) Code for lighting. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers/Society of Light and Lighting, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Osterhaus WKE (2005) Discomfort glare assessment and prevention for daylight applications in office environments. Solar Energy 79(2):140–158Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chauvel P, Collins JB, Dogniaux R, Longmore J (1982) Glare from windows: current views of the problem. Light Res Technol 14(1):31–46Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Velds M (2002) User acceptance studies to evaluate discomfort glare in daylit rooms. Solar Energy 73(2):95–103Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tuaycharoen N, Tregenza PR (2007) View and discomfort glare from windows. Light Res Technol 39(2):185–200Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Webb AR (2006) Considerations for lighting in the built environment: Non-visual effects of light. Energ Buildings 38(7):721–727Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Collins BL (1976) Review of the psychological reaction to windows. Light Res Technol 8(2):80–88Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Boyce PR, Beckstead JW, Eklund NH, Strobel RW, Rea MS (1997) Lighting the graveyard shift: The influence of a daylight-simulating skylight on the task performance and mood of night-shift workers. Light Res Technol 29(3):105–134Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Brainard GC, Hanifin JP, Greeson JM, Byrne B, Glickman G, Gerner E, Rollag MD (2001) Action spectrum for melatonin regulation in humans: evidence for a novel circadian photoreceptor. J Neurosci 21(16):6405–6412Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mclntyre IM, Norman TR, Burrows GD, Armstrong SM (1989) Human melatonin suppression by light is intensity dependent. J Pineal Res 6(2):149–156Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rea MS, Figueiro MG, Bullough JD (2002) Circadian photobiology: an emerging framework for lighting practice and research. Light Res Technol 34(3):177–187Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pechacek CS, Andersen M, Lockley SW (2008) Preliminary method for prospective analysis of the circadian efficacy of (day) light with applications to healthcare architecture. Leukos 5(1):1–26Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hubalek S, Brink M, Schierz C (2010) Office workers’ daily exposure to light and its influence on sleep quality and mood. Light Res Technol 42(1):33–50Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Walch JM, Rabin BS, Day R, Williams JN, Choi K, Kang JD (2005) The effect of sunlight on postoperative analgesic medication use: a prospective study of patients undergoing spinal surgery. Psychosom Med 67(1):156–163Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (2004) The role of hospital design in the recruitment, retention and performance of NHS nurses in England. CABE, pp 120–124Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Heschong Mahone Group (1999) Daylighting in schools: an investigation into the relationship between daylight and human performance. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Heschong Mahone Group (2003) Windows and offices: a study of office worker performance and the indoor environment. Heschong L (ed) CEC, California Energy CommissionGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Heschong Mahone Group (1999) Skylight and retails sales, an investigation into relationship between daylighting and human performance. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    National Research Council (2007) Green schools: attributes for health and learning. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, Committee to Review and Assess the Health and Productivity Benefits of Green SchoolsGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Noguchi H, Itou T, Katayama S, Koyama E, Morita T, Sato M (2004) Effects of bright light exposure in the office (proceedings of the 7th international congress of physiological anthropology). J Physiol Anthropol Appl Hum Sci 23(6):368Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mills P, Tomkins S, Schlangen L (2007) The effect of high correlated colour temperature office lighting on employee wellbeing and work performance. J Circadian Rhythms 5(1):2Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hunt DRG (1980) Predicting artificial lighting use – a method based upon observed patterns of behaviour. Light Res Technol 12(1):7–14Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Reinhart CF, Voss K (2003) Monitoring manual control of electric lighting and blinds. Light Res Technol 35(3):243–258Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Newsham GR, Mahdavi A, Beausoleil-Morrison I (1995) Lightswitch: a stochastic model for predicting office lighting energy consumption. In: Proceedings of right light 3, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UKGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Reinhart CF (2004) Lightswitch-2002: a model for manual and automated control of electric lighting and blinds. Solar Energy 77(1):15–28Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Mardaljevic J, Heschong L, Lee E (2009) Daylight metrics and energy savings. Light Res Technol 41(3):261–283Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Mardaljevic J (2006) Examples of climate-based daylight modelling. In: CIBSE national conference 2006: engineering the future, Oval Cricket Ground, London, 21–22 Mar 2006Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Crawley DB, Lawrie LK, Winkelmann FC, Buhl WF, Huang YJ, Pedersen CO, Strand RK, Liesen RJ, Fisher DE, Witte MJ, Glazer J (2001) EnergyPlus: creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energ Buildings 33(4):319–331Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Mardaljevic J (2006) Time to see the light. Build Serv J September:59–62Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mardaljevic J (2000) Simulation of annual daylighting profiles for internal illuminance. Light Res Technol 32(3):111–118Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Reinhart CF, Herkel S (2000) The simulation of annual daylight illuminance distributions – a state-of-the-art comparison of six RADIANCE-based methods. Energ Buildings 32(2):167–187Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Nabil A, Mardaljevic J (2006) Useful daylight illuminances: a replacement for daylight factors. Energ Buildings 38(7):905–913Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Reinhart CF, Mardaljevic J, Rogers Z (2006) Dynamic daylight performance metrics for sustainable building design. Leukos 3(1):7–31Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Reinhart CF, Walkenhorst O (2001) Validation of dynamic radiance-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds. Energ Buildings 33(7):683–697Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Littlefair PJ (1990) Review paper: Innovative daylighting: Review of systems and evaluation methods. Light Res Technol 22(1):1–17Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Andersen M (2002) Light distribution through advanced fenestration systems. Build Res Inf 30(4):264–281Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    SolaVeil. http://www.solaveil.co.uk. Accessed 2011
  73. 73.
    Lee ES, Selkowitz SE, Hughes GD, Clear RD, Ward G, Mardaljevic J, Lai J, Inanici MN, Inkarojrit V (2005) Daylighting the New York Times headquarters building. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Final report LBNL-57602Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Selkowitz S, Lee ES (1998) Advanced fenestration systems for improved daylight performance. In: Daylighting ‘98 conference proceedings, Ottawa, ON, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Lee ES, DiBartolomeo DL (2002) Application issues for large-area electrochromic windows in commercial buildings. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 71(4):465–491Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Sullivan R, Rubin M, Selkowitz S (1996) Energy performance analysis of prototype electrochromic windows, Report number: LBL-39905 BS-360. Technical report, Lawrence Berkeley LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Inoue T, Ichinose M, Ichikawa N (2008) Thermotropic glass with active dimming control for solar shading and daylighting. Energ Buildings 40(3):385–393Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Optics5. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. http://windows.lbl.gov/materials/optics5. Accessed 2011
  79. 79.
    Apian-Bennewitz P, von der Hardt J (1998) Enhancing and calibrating a goniophotometer. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 54(1–4):309–322Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Andersen M, Michel L, Roecker C, Scartezzini JL (2001) Experimental assessment of bi-directional transmission distribution functions using digital imaging techniques. Energ Buildings 33(5):417–431Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Reinhart CF, Andersen M (2006) Development and validation of a Radiance model for a translucent panel. Energ Buildings 38(7):890–904Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Andersen M, Rubin M, Powles R, Scartezzini JL (2005) Bi-directional transmission properties of venetian blinds: experimental assessment compared to ray-tracing calculations. Solar Energy 78(2):187–198Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Greenup PJ, Edmonds IR, Compagnon R (2000) Radiance algorithm to simulate laser-cut panel light-redirecting elements. Light Res Technol 32(2):49–54Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Mardaljevic J (2007) Climate-based daylight modelling for evaluation and education. In: VELUX daylight symposium, Bilbao, Spain, 6–7 May 2007Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Breitenbach J, Lart S, Langle I, Rosenfeld JLJ (2001) Optical and thermal performance of glazing with integral venetian blinds. Energ Buildings 33(5):433–442Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Carter DJ (2002) The measured and predicted performance of passive solar light pipe systems. Light Res Technol 34(1):39–51Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Jenkins D, Muneer T, Kubie J (2005) A design tool for predicting the performances of light pipes. Energ Buildings 37(5):485–492Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Reinhard E, Ward G, Pattanaik S, Debevec P (2005) High dynamic range imaging: acquisition, display, and image-based lighting (the Morgan Kaufmann series in computer graphics). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Wienold J, Christoffersen J (2006) Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energ Buildings 38(7):743–757Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Painter B, Fan D, Mardaljevic J (2009) Evidence-based daylight research: development of a new visual comfort monitoring method. Lux Europa, Istanbul, pp 953–960Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Newsham GR, Aries MBC, Mancini S, Faye G (2008) Individual control of electric lighting in a daylit space. Light Res Technol 40(1):25–41Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Newsham GR, Arsenault C (2009) A camera as a sensor for lighting and shading control. Light Res Technol 41(2):143–163Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Crisp VHC (1977) Preliminary study of automatic daylight control of artificial lighting. Light Res Technol 9(1):31–41Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Hunt DRG (1977) Simple expressions for predicting energy savings from photo-electric control of lighting. Light Res Technol 9(2):93–102Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Hunt DRG (1979) Improved daylight data for predicting energy savings from photoelectric controls. Light Res Technol 11(1):9–23Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Crisp VHC (1978) The light switch in buildings. Light Res Technol 10(2):69–82Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Bordass B, Cohen R, Standeven M, Leaman A (2001) Assessing building performance in use 3: energy performance of the probe buildings. Build Res Inf 29(2):114–128Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Heschong Mahone Group (2006) Sidelighting photocontrols field study. Final Report to Southern California Edison Co, Pacific Gas & Electric Company and Northwest Energy Efficiency AllianceGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    DTI (2000) Photovoltaics in buildings: BIPV projects programme – strategy document 1998–2002. Technical report, Dept. of Trade and IndustryGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Yoon S, Tak S, Kim J, Jun Y, Kang K, Park J (2011) Application of transparent dye-sensitized solar cells to building integrated photovoltaic systems. Build Environ 46(10):1899–1904Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Energy and Sustainable DevelopmentDe Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK