Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

2014 Edition
| Editors: Gerben Bruinsma, David Weisburd

Police-Led Interventions to Enhance Police Legitimacy

  • Sarah Bennett
  • Jacqueline Davis
  • Lorraine Mazerolle
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_478

Synonyms

Overview

A growing body of policing research demonstrates that procedurally just approaches to policing – including satisfaction, trust, and confidence – improve citizen perceptions of police, thereby influencing perceptions of police legitimacy and facilitating the capacity of police to maintain order and control crime. This entry draws from a systematic search of police legitimacy and presents a qualitative overview of 104 evaluations of policing interventions that sought to improve police legitimacy. Mazerolle and colleagues (2013) used content analytic methods to synthesize the extant literature, examining studies that used either a process- or instrumental-based approach to enhance perceptions of legitimacy. In this entry, it is shown that some interventions, notably those that are police-only type interventions, seek to influence legitimacy primarily through their efforts to be more effective. In contrast, interventions that involve partnership...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading and References

  1. Bayley DH, Mendelsohn H (1969) Minorities and the police: confrontation in America. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell J (2004) The police and policing. In: Sarat A (ed) The Blackwell companion to law and society. Blackwell Publishing, Blackwell Reference Online. Retrieved from http://www.blackwellreference.com/subscriber/tocnode?id=g9780631228967_chunk_g978063122896710 Google Scholar
  3. Bellman A (1935) A police service rating scale. J Crim Law Criminol (1931–1951) 26(1):74–114Google Scholar
  4. Bennett S, Denning R, Mazerolle L, Stocks B (2009) Procedural justice: a systematic literature search and technical report to the National Policing Improvement Agency. ARC Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  5. Daly K, Hayes H, Marchetti E (2006) New visions of justice. In: Goldsmith A, Israel M, Daly K (eds) Crime and justice: a guide to criminology, 3rd edn. Lawbook Company, Sydney, pp 439–464Google Scholar
  6. Decker SH (1981) Citizen attitudes toward the police – a review of past findings and suggestions for future policy. J Police Sci Adm 9(1):80–87Google Scholar
  7. Fielding NG (2002) Theorizing community policing. Brit J Criminol 42(1):147–163Google Scholar
  8. Hails J, Borum R (2003) Police training and specialized approaches to respond to people with mental illnesses. Crime Delinq 49(1):52–61Google Scholar
  9. Hinds L, Murphy K (2007) Public satisfaction with police: using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy. Aust N Z J Criminol 40(1):27–42Google Scholar
  10. Maher L, Dixon D (1999) Policing and public health: law enforcement and harm minimization in a street-level drug market. Br J Criminol 39(4):488–512Google Scholar
  11. Marshall TF (1999) Restorative justice: an overview. Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Mastrofski SD, Snipes JB, Supina AE (1996) Compliance on demand: the public’s response to specific police requests. J Res Crime Delinq 33(3):269–305Google Scholar
  13. Mazerolle L, Bennett S, Davis J, Manning M (2013) Legitimacy in policing. The Campbell Collaboration Library of Systematic Reviews. http://campbellcollaboration.org/lib/project/141/
  14. McCluskey JD (2003) Police requests for compliance: coercive and procedurally just tactics. LFB Scholarly Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Moore DB, O’Connell T (1994) Family conferencing in Wagga Wagga: a communitarian model of justice. In: Alder C, Wundersitz J (eds) Family conferencing and juvenile justice: the way forward or misplaced optimism? Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, pp 15–44Google Scholar
  16. Parratt SD (1938) How effective is a police department? Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 199:153–164Google Scholar
  17. Reiner R (1985) The politics of the police, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Reiss AJ (1971) The police and the public. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  19. Skolnick JH, Bayley DH (1988) Theme and variation in community policing. Crime Justice 10:1–37Google Scholar
  20. Sunshine J, Tyler TR (2003) The role of procedural justice for legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law Soc Rev 37(3):513–548Google Scholar
  21. Thibaut JW, Walker L (1975) Procedural justice: a psychological analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  22. Tyler TR (1990) Why people obey the law. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  23. Tyler TR (2003) Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime Justice 30:283–357Google Scholar
  24. Tyler TR (2004) Enhancing police legitimacy. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 593:84–99Google Scholar
  25. Tyler TR (2006) Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annu Rev Psychol 57:375–400Google Scholar
  26. Tyler TR, Fagan J (2008) Legitimacy and cooperation: why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State J Crim Law 6:231–275Google Scholar
  27. Tyler TR, Huo YJ (2002) Trust in the law. Russell Sage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Tyler TR, Lind EA (1992) A relational model of authority in groups. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 25:115–191Google Scholar
  29. Weisburd D, Braga AA (eds) (2006) Police innovation: contrasting perspectives. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Weisburd D, Eck JE (2004) What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear? Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 593(1):42–46Google Scholar
  31. Wells LE (2007) Type of contact and evaluations of police officers: the effects of procedural justice across three types of police–citizen contacts. J Crim Justice 35(6):612–621Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Bennett
    • 1
  • Jacqueline Davis
    • 1
  • Lorraine Mazerolle
    • 2
  1. 1.Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security (ARC), Institute for Social Science Research (ISSR), The University of QueenslandSt. LuciaAustralia
  2. 2.Institute for Social Science Research, The University of QueenslandSt. LuciaAustralia