Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

2014 Edition
| Editors: Gerben Bruinsma, David Weisburd

Forecasting of Shootings Using Risk Terrain Modeling

  • Joel M. Caplan
  • Leslie W. Kennedy
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_296



This entry summarizes approaches that have been used to study patterns of shootings and empirically examines the environmental conditions that contribute to the emergence of these events. Geographic information systems (GIS) allow for the mapping of spatial influence which refers to the way in which correlates of crime, as features of a landscape, affect places throughout the landscape. Rather than just a feature’s presence, its influence on space is important because context affects criminal behavior. Operationalizing the spatial influence of crime correlates allows analysts to move beyond just creating maps of points that coexist with crime to creating visual narratives of how settings become conducive to crime. This entry presents ways in which to operationalize criminogenic features of gun shootings to a geographic map. Then it presents the utility of this mapping technique for crime analysis through the use of risk...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading and References

  1. Abbott A (1997) Of time and space: the contemporary relevance of the Chicago. Soc Forces 75:1149–1182Google Scholar
  2. Bernasco W, Block R (2010, online first) Robberies in Chicago: a block level analysis of the influence of crime generators, crime attractors, and offender anchor points. J Res Crime Delinq 48(1):33–57Google Scholar
  3. Bowers KJ, Johnson SD, Pease K (2004) Prospective hot-spotting: the future of crime mapping? Br J Criminol 44(5):641–658Google Scholar
  4. Braga AA, Weisburd DL (2010) Policing problem places. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Brantingham PJ, Brantingham PL (1981) Environmental criminology. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  6. Brantingham PJ, Brantingham PL (1995) Criminality of place: crime generators and crime attractors. Eur J Crim Policy Res 3:1–26Google Scholar
  7. Caplan JM (2011) Mapping the spatial influence of crime correlates: a comparison of operationalization schemes and implications for crime analysis and CJ practice. Cityscape 14(3):57–83Google Scholar
  8. Caplan JM, Kennedy LW (2010) Risk terrain modeling manual: theoretical framework and technical steps of spatial risk assessment. Rutgers Center on Public Security, Newark. Available at www.riskterrainmodeling.com
  9. Caplan JM, Kennedy LW, Miller J (2011) Risk terrain modeling: brokering criminological theory and GIS methods for crime forecasting. Justice Q 28(2):360–381 [2010, online first]Google Scholar
  10. Cohen LE, Felson M (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. Am Sociol Rev 44:588–608Google Scholar
  11. Couclelis H (1992) People manipulate objects (but cultivate fields): beyond the raster-vector debate in GIS. In: Frank A, Campari I, Formentini U (eds) Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space. Lecture notes in computer science 639. Springer, New York, pp 65–77Google Scholar
  12. Eck JE, Weisburd D (1995) Crime places in crime theory. In: Eck JE, Weisburd D (eds) Crime and place, crime prevention studies, vol 4. Willow Tree Press, Monsey, pp 1–34Google Scholar
  13. Egenhofer M, Mark D (1995) Naïve geography, pp 1–15. In: Frank A, Kuhn W (eds) Spatial information theory – a theoretical basis for GIS, international conference COSIT ‘95, Semmering, Lecture notes in computer science 988. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Frank A (1993) The use of geographical information systems: the user interface is the system. In: Medyckyj-Scott D, Hearnshaw H (eds) Human factors in geographic information systems. Belhaven Press, London, pp 3–14Google Scholar
  15. Frank A, Mark D (1991) Language issues for GIS. In: Maguire D, Goodchild M, Rhind D (eds) Geographic information systems: principles. Longman, London, pp 147–163Google Scholar
  16. Freundschuh SM, Egenhofer MJ (1997) Human conceptions of spaces: implications for geographic information systems. Trans GIS 2(4):361–375Google Scholar
  17. Groff ER, La Vigne NG (2002) Forecasting the future of predictive crime mapping. In: Tilley N (ed) Analysis for crime prevention, vol 13, Crime prevention studies. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, pp 29–58Google Scholar
  18. Johnson SD (2010) A brief history of crime concentration. Eur J Appl Math 21(4/5):349–370Google Scholar
  19. Johnson S, Bowers KJ, Birks D, Pease K (2008) Predictive mapping: accuracy for different units of analysis and the role of the environmental backcloth. In: Weisburd D, Bernasco W, Bruinsma G (eds) Putting crime in it’s place: units of analysis in spatial crime research. Springer, New York, pp 171–198Google Scholar
  20. Kennedy LW, Van Brunschot EG (2009) The risk in crime. Roman and Littlefield, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Kennedy LW, Caplan JM, Piza E (2011) Risk clusters, hotspots, and spatial intelligence: risk terrain modeling as an algorithm for police resource allocation strategies. J Quant Criminol 27:339–362Google Scholar
  22. Koflas JM, Hipple NK, McGarrell E (2011) The new criminal justice: American communities and the changing world of crime control. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Mark D (1993) Human spatial cognition. In: Medyckyj-Scott D, Hearnshaw H (eds) Human factors in geographical information systems. Belhaven Press, London, pp 51–60Google Scholar
  24. Moreto WD, Piza EL, Caplan JM (2011) A plague on both your houses?: risks, repeats and reconsiderations of urban residential burglary. Paper presented at the American society of criminology annual meeting; Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Ratcliffe JH, Rengert GF (2008) Near repeat patterns in Philadelphia shootings. Secur J 21(1–2):58–76Google Scholar
  26. Sherman LW, Gartin PR, Buerger ME (1989) Hot spots of predatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology 27:27–55Google Scholar
  27. Spelman W, Eck JE (1989) Sitting ducks, ravenous wolves, and helping hands: new approaches to Urban policing. Public Aff Comment 35(2):1–9Google Scholar
  28. Weisburd D (2008) Place-based policing. Ideas in policing series. Police Foundation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Wells W, Wu L, Ye X (2011) Patterns of near-repeat gun assaults in Houston. J Res Crime Delinq. Published online 12 May 2011Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Criminal JusticeRutgers UniversityNewarkUSA