Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

2014 Edition
| Editors: Gerben Bruinsma, David Weisburd

General Strain Theory

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_218

Overview

General strain theory (GST) states that strains increase the likelihood of crime, particularly strains that are high in magnitude, are seen as unjust, are associated with low social control, and create some pressure or incentive for criminal coping. Examples include parental rejection, criminal victimization, a desperate need for money, and discrimination. These strains increase crime for several reasons; most notably, they lead to a range of negative emotions, which create pressure for corrective action. Crime is one possible response. Crime may be used to reduce or escape from strains (e.g., theft to obtain money, running away to escape abusive parents), seek revenge against the source of strain or related targets, or alleviate negative emotions (e.g., through illicit drug use). A range of factors, however, influence the response to strains. A criminal response is more likely when people lack the ability to cope in a legal manner, are disposed to crime, and the costs of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading and References

  1. Agnew R (1992) Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology 30:47–87Google Scholar
  2. Agnew R (2001) Building on the foundation of general strain theory: specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. J Res Crime Delinq 38:319–361Google Scholar
  3. Agnew R (2006) Pressured into crime: an overview of general strain theory. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Agnew R (2010a) A general strain theory of terrorism. Theor Criminol 14:131–154Google Scholar
  5. Agnew R (2010b) Controlling crime: recommendations from general strain theory. In: Barlow HD, Decker SH (eds) Criminology and public policy: putting theory to work. Temple University Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  6. Agnew R, Scheuerman H (2011) Strain theories. Oxford bibliographies online at http://oxfordbibliographiesonline.com/
  7. Agnew R, Piquero NL, Cullen FT (2009) General strain theory and white-collar crime. In: Simpson SS, Weisburd D (eds) The criminology of white-collar crime. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Bao W, Haas A (2009) Social change, life strain, and delinquency among Chinese urban adolescents. Sociol Focus 42:285–305Google Scholar
  9. Baron SW (2008) Street youth, unemployment, and crime: is it that simple? Using general strain theory to untangle the relationship. Can J Criminol Crim Justice 50:399–434Google Scholar
  10. Baron SW (2009) Street youths’ violent responses to violent personal, vicarious, and anticipated strain. J Crim Justice 37:442–451Google Scholar
  11. Blevins KR, Listwan S, Cullen FT, Johnson CL (2010) A general strain theory of prison violence and misconduct: an integrated model of inmate behavior. J Contemp Crim Justice 26:148–166Google Scholar
  12. Brezina T, Piquero AR, Mazerolle P (2001) Student anger and aggressive behavior in school: an initial test of Agnew’s macro-level strain theory. J Res Crime Delinq 38:362–386Google Scholar
  13. Colvin M (2000) Crime and coercion. St. Martin’s Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. De Coster S, Zito RC (2010) Gender and general strain theory: the gendering of emotional experiences and expressions. J Contemp Crim Justice 26:224–245Google Scholar
  15. Eitle DJ (2002) Exploring a source of deviance-producing strain for females: perceived discrimination and general strain theory. J Crim Justice 30:429–442Google Scholar
  16. Eitle D (2010) General strain theory, persistence, and desistence among young adult males. J Crim Justice 38:1113–1121Google Scholar
  17. Froggio G, Agnew R (2007) The relationship between crime and ‘objective’ versus ‘subjective’ strains. J Crim Justice 35:81–87Google Scholar
  18. Hay C, Meldrum R, Mann K (2010) Traditional bullying, cyber bullying, and deviance: a general strain theory approach. J Contemp Crim Justice 26:13–147Google Scholar
  19. Hoffmann JP (2010) Contemporary retrospective on general strain theory. In: Copes H, Topalli V (eds) Criminological theory: readings and retrospectives. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Jang SJ, Johnson BR (2005) Gender, religiosity, and reactions to strain among African Americans. Sociol Q 46:323–357Google Scholar
  21. Kaufman JM, Rebellon CJ, Thaxton S, Agnew R (2008) A general strain theory of racial differences in criminal offending. Aust N Z J Criminol 41:421–437Google Scholar
  22. Maier-Katkin D, Mears DP, Bernard TJ (2009) Toward a criminology of crimes against humanity. Theor Criminol 13:227–255Google Scholar
  23. Mazerolle P, Maahs J (2000) General strain theory and delinquency: an alternative examination of conditioning influences. Justice Q 17:753–778Google Scholar
  24. Moffitt TE, Ross S, Raine A (2011) Crime and biology. In: Wilson JQ, Petersilia J (eds) Crime and public policy. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Perez DM, Jennings WG, Gover AR (2008) Specifying general strain theory: an ethnically relevant approach. Deviant Behav 29:544–578Google Scholar
  26. Piquero NL, Fox K, Piquero AR, Capowich G, Mazerolle P (2010) Gender, general strain theory, negative emotions, and disordered eating. J Youth Adolesc 39:380–392Google Scholar
  27. Rebellon CJ, Piquero NL, Piquero AR, Thaxton S (2009) Do frustrated economic expectations and objective economic inequity promote crime. Eur J Criminol 6:47–71Google Scholar
  28. Simons RL, Chen Y, Stewart EA, Brody GH (2003) Incidents of discrimination and risk for delinquency: a longitudinal test of strain theory with an African American sample. Justice Q 20:827–854Google Scholar
  29. Slocum LA (2010) General strain theory and the development of stressors and substance use over time: an empirical examination. J Crim Justice 38:1100–1112Google Scholar
  30. Slocum LA, Simpson SS, Smith DA (2005) Strained lives and crime: examining intra-individual variation in strain and offending in a sample of incarcerated women. Criminology 43:827–854Google Scholar
  31. Warner BD, Fowler SK (2003) Strain and violence: testing a general strain theory model of community violence. J Crim Justice 31:511–521Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA