Skip to main content

Applied Geographical Profiling

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

Synonyms

Geo-forensic Analysis; Geographical Offender Profiling; Journey to Crime

Overview

Geographical offender profiling (GP) is the practical application of various geographical, criminological, and psychological principles to typically estimate the most likely area of an offender’s home base (e.g., the offender’s residence) or anchor point (e.g., place of work or frequent activity) based on the location of their criminal activity (e.g., crime sites) (Rossmo 2000). The output of a GP analysis can inform ongoing investigative strategy in several ways (Rossmo 2000): suspect prioritization, patrol saturation, neighborhood canvasses, police information systems, and DNA searches, to name but a few (for further strategies used, see Knabe-Nicol and Alison 2011). This entry aims to introduce the reader to the environmental criminological and psychological basis of geographical profiling, discuss state-of-the-art journey to crime (JTC) research, and advocate the further integration of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 4,350.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 4,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading and References

  • Beauregard E, Rossmo D, Proulx J (2007) A descriptive model of the hunting process of serial sex offenders: a rational choice perspective. J Family Violence 22:449–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauregard E, Rebocho M, Rossmo DK (2010) Target selection patterns in rape. J Investig Psychol Offender Profil 7:137–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernasco W (2007) The usefulness of measuring spatial opportunity structures for tracking down offenders: a theoretical analysis of geographic offender profiling using simulation studies. Psychol Crime Law 13:155–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Bichler G, Christie-Merrall J, Sechrest D (2011) Examining juvenile delinquency within activity space: building a context for offender travel patterns. J Res Crime Delinq 48:472–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham PJ, Brantingham PL (1984) Patterns in crime. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter DV, Gregory A (1994) Identifying the residential location of rapists. J Forensic Sci Soc 34:169–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter DV, Larkin P (1993) The environmental range of serial rapists. J Environ Psychol 13:63–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter DV, Shalev K (2000) Putting crime in its place: Psychological process in crime site selection, Wheredunit? Investigating the role of place in crime and criminality. Crime Mapping Research Center of the National Institute of Justice, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter DV, Youngs D (eds) (2008a) Applications of geographical offender profiling. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter DV, Youngs D (eds) (2008b) Principles of geographical offender profiling. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter DV, Coffey T, Huntley M, Missen C (2000) Predicting serial killers’ home base using a decision support system. J Quant Criminol 16(4):457–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen LE, Felson M (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. Am Sociol Rev 44:588–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish D, Clarke R (1986) Rationale choice approaches to crime. In: Cornish D, Clarke R (eds) The reasoning criminal: rational choice perspectives on offending. Springer, New York, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • de Poot CJ, Luykx F, Elffers H, Dudink CGD (2005) Living here and perpetrating there? Social boundaries and location choice. Tijdschr Criminol 47:255–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Dern H, Frönd R, Straub U, Vick J, Witt R (2005) Geographical behaviour of stranger offenders in violent sexual crimes. BKA, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabor T, Gottheil E (1984) Offender characteristics and spatial mobility: an empirical study and some policy implications. Can J Criminol 26:267–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwill AM, Alison LJ (2005) Sequential angulation, spatial dispersion and consistency of distance attack patterns from home in serial murder, rape and burglary. Psychol Crime Law 11(2):161–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwill AM, Alison LJ (2006) The development of a filter model for prioritising suspects in burglary offences. Psychol Crime Law 12:395–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent J, Leitner M (2009) Utilizing land cover characteristics to enhance journey-to-crime estimation models. Crime Mapping: J Res Pract 1:33–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent J, Leitner M, Curtis A (2006) Evaluating the usefulness of functional distance measures when calibrating Journey-to-Crime distance decay algorithms. Comput Environ Urban Syst 30:181–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Kind SS (1987) Navigational ideas and the Yorkshire Ripper investigation. J Navig 40:385–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Knabe-Nicol S, Alison L (2011) The cognitive expertise of geographic profilers. In: Alison L, Rainbow L (eds) Professionalizing offender profiling: forensic and investigative psychology in practice, 1st edn. Routledge, London, pp 126–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocsis R, Irwin H (1997) An analysis of spatial patterns in serial rape, arson, and burglary: the utility of the circle theory of environmental range for psychological profiling. Psychiatr Psychol Law 4(2):195–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner M, Kent J, Oldfield I, Swoope E (2007) Geoforensic analysis revisited—the application of Newton’s geographic profiling method to serial burglaries in London, UK. Polic Pract Res 8:359–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine N (2005) The evaluation of geographic profiling software: response to Kim Rossmo’s critique of the NIJ methodology. Retrieved October 5, 2005, from Ned Levine & Associates web site at: http://www.nedlevine.com/Response%20to%20Kim%20Rossmo%20Critique%20of%20the%20GP%20Evaluation%20Methodology.May%208%202005.doc

  • Levine N (2010) CrimeStat: a spatial statistics program for the analysis of crime incident locations (v 3.3). Ned Levine & Associates/the National Institute of Justice, Houston/Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Meaney R (2004) Commuters and marauders: an examination of the spatial behaviour of serial criminals. J Investig Psychol Offender Profil 1:121–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokros A, Schinke D (2006) Geografische Fallanalyse [Geographical case-analysis]. In: Musolff C, Hoffmann J (eds) Täterprofile bei Gewaltverbrechen: Mythos, Theorie, Praxis und forensische Anwendung des Profilings, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 207–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton MB (1988) Geographical discovery of the residence of an unknown dispersing localized serial murder. Unpublished manuscript, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen D (2006) Human versus machine: a comparison of the accuracy of geographic profiling methods. J Investig Psychol Offender Profil 3(2):77–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen D (2007) Improving geographic profiling through commuter/marauder prediction. Polic Pract Res 8:347–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettiway LE (1982) Mobility of burglary offenders: ghetto and non-ghetto spaces. J Urban Aff Quart 18:255–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyle G (1974) The spatial dynamics of crime (Research Paper No. 159). University of Chicago, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe J (2006) A temporal constraint theory to explain opportunity-based spatial offending patterns. J Res Crime Delinq 43:261–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengert G, Piquero A, Jones P (1999) Distance decay re-examined. Criminology 37(2):427–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossmo DK (2000) Geographic profiling. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossmo DK (2009) Geographic profiling in serial rape investigations. In: Hazelwood RR, Wolbert-Burgess A (eds) Practical aspects of rape investigation: a multidisciplinary approach, 4th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 139–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossmo DK, Davies A, Patrick M (2004) Exploring the geo-demographic and distance relationships between stranger rapists and their offences (Special Interest Series: Paper 16). Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, Home Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Santtila P (2010) Offender profiling. In: Granhag PA (ed) Forensic psychology in context: Nordic and international approaches. Willan Publishing, Cullompton, pp 154–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Santtila P, Zappala A, Laukkanen M, Picozzi M (2003) Testing the utility of a geographic profiling approach in three rape series of a single offender: a case study. Forensic Sci Int 131:42–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Santtila P, Laukkanen M, Zappalà A (2007) Crime behaviours and distance travelled in homicides and rapes. J Investig Psychol Offender Profil 4:1–15. doi:10.1002/jip. 56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snook B, Canter D, Bennell C (2002) Predicting the home location of serial offenders: a preliminary comparison of the accuracy of human judges with a geographic profiling system. Behav Sci Law 20(1–2):109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Snook B, Taylor P, Bennell C (2004) Geographic profiling: the fast, frugal, and accurate way. Appl Cogn Psychol 18:105–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Snook B, Cullen R, Mokros A, Harbort H (2005a) Serial murderers’ spatial decisions: factors that influence crime location choice. J Investig Psychol Offender Profil 2:147–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Snook B, Zito M, Bennell C, Taylor PJ (2005b) On the complexity and accuracy of geographic profiling strategies. J Quant Criminol 21:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Snook B, Dhami MK, Kavanagh JM (2010) Simply criminal: predicting burglars’ occupancy decisions with a simple heuristic. Law Human Behav 35(4):316–326. Springer. doi:10.1007/s10979-010-9238-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stangeland P (2005) Catching a serial rapist: hits and misses in criminal profiling. Police Practice and Research 6:453–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsley M, Sidebottom A (2010) All offenders are equal, but some are more equal than others: variation in journeys to crime between offenders. Criminology 48(3):897–917

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotta M, Bidaine B, Donnay JP (2011) Determining the geographical origin of a serial offender considering the temporal uncertainty of the recorded crime data. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on advanced geographic information systems, applications, and services. Gosier, Guadeloupe, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Kemp JJ, van Koppen PJ (2007) Fine-tuning geographical profiling. In: Kocsis RN (ed) Criminal profiling: international theory, research, and practice. Humana Press, Totowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Kemp JJ, Pulinckx S, van Beijsterveldt K (2005) Moving in different directions: commuters and marauders. In: 15th European conference on psychology and law, Vilnius

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Koppen PJ, de Keijser J (1997) Desisting distance decay: on the aggregation of individual crime trips. Br J Criminol 35(3):505–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Koppen PJ, Jansen RWJ (1998) The road to the robbery: travel pattern in commercial robberies. Br J Criminol 38:230–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Koppen MV, Elffers H, Ruiter (2011). When to refrain from using likelihood surface methods for geographic offender profiling: An ex ante test of assumptions. J Investig Psychol Offender Profil, DOI: 10.1002/jip.141

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Schaaik JGJ, van der Kemp JJ (2009) Real crimes on virtual maps, the application of geography and GIS in criminology. In: Scholten HJ, van de Velde RJ, van Manen N (eds) Geospatial technology and the role of location in science (GeoJournal Library, 96). Springer, New York, pp 217–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiles P, Costello A (2000) The ‘road to nowhere’: the evidence for travelling criminals (No. 207). Home Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipf GK (1965) Human behavior and the principle of least effort: an introduction to human ecology. Hafner, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alasdair M. Goodwill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Goodwill, A.M., van der Kemp, J.J., Winter, J.M. (2014). Applied Geographical Profiling. In: Bruinsma, G., Weisburd, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_207

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_207

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5689-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5690-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics