Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Thomas Teo

Crowd Psychology

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_62


The topic of crowd psychology has at times been central to the subdiscipline of social psychology, and at other times marginal. Its relative prominence in textbooks and curricula has partly reflected the extent to which wider society has seen “the crowd” as a major social problem. So-called “crowd science” first emerged in late nineteenth-century France as a response to the perceived threat of “the mob” to the social order and indeed to civilization itself. Today, “crowd psychology,” or “crowd behavior,” typically refers to the topic of conflict in crowds, the “problem” specified by this first wave of theory. However, there are other areas of study that fall under the heading of crowd psychology, more broadly conceived. One is the study of crowds in emergencies. Another is the study of the effects of crowding. Sociological accounts of crowd behavior have also been put forward. Indeed from the outset there has been discussion about whether the topic of the crowd falls...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  2. Bendersky, J. W. (2007). ‘Panic’: The impact of Le Bon’s crowd psychology on U.S. military thought. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 43(3), 257–283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berk, R. (1974). A gaming approach to crowd behaviour. American Sociological Review, 39, 355–373.Google Scholar
  4. Cassidy, C., Hopkins, N., Levine, M., Pandey, J., Reicher, S., & Singh, P. (2007). Social identity and collective behaviour: Some lessons from Indian research at the Magh Mela at Prayag. Psychological Studies, 52, 286–293.Google Scholar
  5. Drury, J. (2012). Collective resilience in mass emergencies and disasters: A social identity model. In J. Jetten, C. Haslam, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social cure: Identity, health, and well-being (pp. 195–215). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  6. Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2000). Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 579–604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Drury, J., Reicher, S., & Stott, C. (2003). Transforming the boundaries of collective identity: From the ‘local’ anti-road campaign to ‘global’ resistance? Social Movement Studies, 2, 191–212.Google Scholar
  8. Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. In: Civilization, society and religion.Harmondsworth, UK: PenguinGoogle Scholar
  9. Le Bon, G. (1895/1968). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. Dunwoody, GA: Norman S. Berg. Originally published 1895.Google Scholar
  10. Levine, R. M., Collins, A., & Manning, R. (2007). The Kitty Genovese murder and the social psychology of helping: The parable of the 38 witnesses. American Psychologist, 62(6), 555–562.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. McDougall, W. (1920). The group mind. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
  12. Neville, F., & Reicher, S. (2011). The experience of collective participation: Shared identity, relatedness, and emotionality. Contemporary Social Science, 6(3), 377–396.Google Scholar
  13. Novelli, D., Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2010). Come together: Two studies concerning the impact of group relations on ‘personal space’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 223–236. doi:10.1348/014466609X449377.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). De-individuation and anti-normative behaviour: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238–259.Google Scholar
  15. Reicher, S. D. (1984). The St Pauls riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 1–21.Google Scholar
  16. Reicher, S. D. (1987). Crowd behaviour as social action. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 176–178). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Reicher, S. (1996a). Social identity and social change: Rethinking the context of social psychology. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 317–336). London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
  18. Reicher, S. (1996b). ‘The battle of Westminster’: Developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 115–134.Google Scholar
  19. Reicher, S. (1996c). The crowd century: Reconciling practical success with theoretical failure. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 535–553.Google Scholar
  20. Reicher, S. (2001). The psychology of crowd dynamics. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 182–208). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Reicher, S., & Drury, J. (2011). Collective identity, political participation and the making of the social self. In A. Azzi, X. Chryssochoou, B. Klandermans, & B. Simon (Eds.), Identity and participation in culturally diverse societies: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 158–176). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Haslam, S. A. (2009). The social identity approach in social psychology. In M. Wetherell & C. T. Mohanty (Eds.), The Sage handbook of identities (pp. 45–62). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Still, K. (2000). Crowd dynamics. Ph.D. dissertation. UK: Department of Mathematics, University of Warwick. Available at http://www.safercrowds.com/2000_still.pdf
  24. Stott, C., & Reicher, S. (1998). Crowd action as inter-group process: Introducing the police perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 509–529.Google Scholar
  25. Thompson, E. P. (1971). The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century. Past & Present, 50, 76–136.Google Scholar
  26. Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. M. (1957). Collective behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Van Ginneken, J. (1992). Crowds, psychology, and politics 1871–1899. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of SussexBrightonUK