Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Thomas Teo

Homosexuality, Overview

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_352

Introduction

What do we talk about when we talk about homosexuality? The anachronistic character of word itself rankles; in an era when gay, lesbian, or queer are the self-appellations, “homosexuality” evokes the clinic, the courtroom, or the clergy. The term is also an inelegant mash-up of Greek and Latin, evoking “man sex” as much as “same sex” (maybe because women’s sexuality has been a footnote until so recently). But it is the it in homosexuality that is at the core of past and current debates: the idea that it defines a class and type of persons – essentially or perversely, proudly or furtively – different from, and the defining other of, heterosexuals. Since the late nineteenth century, homosexuality has meant – with a few exceptions like anthropologists or Kinsey – something more and other than same-sex sexual behaviors. Whether one viewed it as pathological or as normal variation, homosexuality has meant a condition, an orientation, a personality, and even a culture. One...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abelove, H. (1993). Freud, male homosexuality, and the Americans. In H. Abelove, M. A. Barale, & D. M. Halperin (Eds.), The lesbian and gay studies reader (pp. 381–393). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, M. J., & Mohanty, C. T. (Eds.). (1997). Feminist genealogies, colonial legacies, democratic futures. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association. (2002). Answers to your questions about sexual orientation and homosexuality. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubinfo/answers.html#whatis
  4. Bailey, J. M., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Genetic and environmental influences on sexual orientation and its correlates in an Australian twin sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 524–536.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bem, D. J. (2000). Exotic becomes erotic: Interpreting the biological correlates of sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 531–548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernstein, D. A., Penner, L. A., Clarke-Stewart, A., & Roy, E. J. (2008). Psychology (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  7. Bocklandt, S., & Vilain, E. (2007). Sex differences in brain and behavior: Hormones versus genetics. Advances in Genetics, 59, 245–266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bristow, J. (1997). Sexuality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Cohler, B., & Hammack, P. (2007). The psychological world of the gay teenager: Social change, narrative, and “normality”. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(1), 47–59.Google Scholar
  10. Cruz-Malave, A., & Manalansan, M. F. (Eds.). (2010). Queer globalizations: Citizenship and the afterlife of colonialism. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  11. D’Emilio, J., & Freedman, E. (1997). Intimate matters: A history of sexuality in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Diamond, L. M. (2008). Female bisexuality from adolescence to adulthood: Results from a 10-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 44, 5–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2012). Sex/gender: Biology in a social world. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, volume I: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (2003). Abnormal: Lectures at the College de France, 1974–1975 (G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  16. Garber, M. (2000). Bisexuality and the eroticism of everyday life. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Halperin, D. M. (1993). Is there a history of sexuality? In H. Abelove, M. A. Barale, & D. M. Halperin (Eds.), The lesbian and gay studies reader (pp. 416–431). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Hines, M. (2009). Gonadal hormones and sexual differentiation of human brain and behavior. In D. W. Pfaff, A. P. Arnold, A. M. Etgen, S. E. Fahrbach, & A. T. Rubin (Eds.), Hormones, brain and behavior (2nd ed., pp. 1869–1909). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, E. P., & Henderson, M. G. (Eds.). (2005). Black queer studies: A critical anthology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Katz, J. N. (1995). The invention of heterosexuality. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  21. Kendler, K. S., Thornton, L. M., Gilman, S. E., & Kessler, R. C. (2000). Sexual orientation in a U.S. national sample of twin and non-twin sibling pairs. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1843–1846.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kitzinger, C. (1997). Lesbian and gay psychology: A critical analysis. In D. Fox & I. Prilleltensky (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (pp. 202–216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. McIntosh, M. (1981). The homosexual role. In K. Plummer (Ed.), The making of the modern homosexual. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  24. Patton, C. (1995). Performativity and social distinction: The end of AIDS epidemiology. In A. Parker & E. K. Sedgwick (Eds.), Performativity and performance (pp. 173–196). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Rubin, G. (1993). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In H. Abelove, M. A. Barale, & D. M. Halperin (Eds.), The lesbian and gay studies reader (pp. 3–44). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Savin-Williams, R. (2008). Then and now: Recruitment, definition, diversity, and positive attributes of same-sex populations. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 135–138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Showalter, E. (1990). Sexual anarchy: Gender and culture at the fin de siecle. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  28. Spivak, G. C. (1990). In H. Sarah (Ed.), The post-colonial critic: Interviews. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Venn, C. (2000). Occidentalism: Modernity and subjectivity. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Arts and SciencesUniversity of Washington BothellBothellUSA
  2. 2.Cultural StudiesUniversity of Washington BothellBothellUSA