Qualitative Research
Introduction
Qualitative research (QR) offers a rich and varied set of strategies and methods for investigating questions about social and psychological life (see, e.g., Camic, Yardley, & Rhodes 2003). Sometimes known as real-world inquiry (Robson, 2011), QR stands in stark contrast with laboratory experimentation and its core practice of isolating variables (e.g., the presence or absence of group pressure) in strictly controlled situations. The logic of laboratory experimentation is that, because no unknown or confounding variables are operating, it is possible to objectively measure specified variables along with their predicted effects. The logic and ethos of qualitative inquiry (Henwood & Pidgeon, 1993) is rather different as it entails recognising the ways in which knowledge is produced through the researcher’s active engagement in the world under study. Careful looking, listening, recording, and contextualizing people’s “real-world” experiences, thoughts, actions, and...
References
- Camic, P., Yardley, L., & Rhodes, J. E. (Eds.). (2003). Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington, DC: APA Publications.Google Scholar
- Charmaz, K., & Henwood, K. L. (2008). Grounded theory. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 240–260). London, England: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clarke, S., & Hoggett, P. (2009). Researching beneath the surface: Psychosocial research methods practice. London, England: Karnac.Google Scholar
- Gomm, R., & Davies, C. (2000). Using evidence in health and social care. London, England: The Open University.Google Scholar
- Harré, R., & Secord, P. (1972). The explanation of social behaviour. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Henwood, K. L. (2004). Mixing methods in psychology. In Z. Todd (Ed.), The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Henwood, K. L. (2008). Qualitative research, reflexivity and living with risk: Valuing and practicing epistemic reflexivity and centring marginality. Qualitative research in psychology, 5(1), 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Henwood, K. L., & Pidgeon, N. F. (1993). Qualitative research and psychological theorising. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Research methods: Philosophy, politics and practice (pp. 14–32). London, England: Sage/Open University. (Reprinted from The British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 83).Google Scholar
- Henwood, K. L., & Pidgeon, N. F. (1995). Remaking the link: Qualitative research and feminist standpoint theory. Feminism and Psychology, 5(1), 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Henwood, K., Pidgeon, N., Parkhill, K., & Simmons, P. (2010). Researching risk: Narrative, biography, subjectivity [43 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum:Qualitative Social Research, 11(1), Art. 20. (Reprinted 2011, in Historical Social Research, 36(4)).
- Koppala, M., & Suzuki, L. A. (Eds.). (1999). Using qualitative methods in psychology. London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. New York, NY: Sage.Google Scholar
- Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
- Reavey, P. (Ed.). (2011). Visual methods in psychology: Using and interpreting image qualitative research. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Robson, C. (2011). Real world research (3rd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Willig, C. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Willig, C., & Stainton-Rogers, W. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of qualitative research in psychology. London: Sage. pp 240–260.Google Scholar
Online Resources
- The website of the section of the British Psychological Society that is dedicated to qualitative research. http://qmip.bps.org.uk/