Advertisement

Psychological Roots of Social and Linguistic Deficiencies in Autism and the Distinction between Classical and Quantum Neural Computing

  • Antonio CassellaEmail author
Reference work entry

Abstract

Verbal autistics may master semantics and syntax but remain blind to pragmatics. They may surpass normal 4-year-olds in neuropsychological tests that require the capacity to link two representations, yet they will trail behind normal 4-month-olds in tests that measure the ability to shift one’s attention. The uneven performance of autistics advocates for three hypotheses (Logos, or Λ): (1) classical neural computing (sequence, or the first attention), which embraces order and rejects chaos, is spared in ASD; (2) autistics’ blindness to the mental states of others owes to their impaired quantum neural computing (simultaneity, or the second attention), which embraces order and chaos simultaneously; and (3) in nonautistic individuals, classical and quantum neural computing may collaborate to adopt new schemata, create spontaneous dialogues, and manage social encounters. Logos may enrich an understanding of the psychological roots of language deficiencies in autism and educational practices that will convey to autistic individuals the freedom to communicate flexibly.

Keywords

Cognitive Capacity Virtual Object Neural Computing Pretend Play Autistic Individual 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baron-Cohen S. Perceptual role-taking and proto declarative pointing in autism. British J Dev Psychol. 1989;7:113–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron-Cohen S. Mind blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT P; 1995.Google Scholar
  3. Baron-Cohen S, Leslie A, Frith U. Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”. Cognition. 1985;21:37–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caramazza A. Parallels and divergences in the acquisition and dissolution of language. Proc R Soc Lond. 1994;346:121–127.Google Scholar
  5. Cassella A. Self-other differentiation and self-other integration from the perspectives of language development and autism. Master’s thesis, Harvard University; 1997.Google Scholar
  6. Cassella A. Fundamentos cognitivos y semióticos de la creatividad: aportes del Autismo. Tesis Doctoral, UNESR, Caracas; 2000.Google Scholar
  7. Cassella A. El desarrollo de la inteligencia social: aportes del autismo. Maracaibo: Ediluz; 2002.Google Scholar
  8. Cassella A. Readjusting what we know with what we imagine. In: Allen R, editor. Human ecology economics: a framework for global sustainability. London: Routledge; 2008. p. 230–57.Google Scholar
  9. Cassella A. Autism and the interplay of deterministic and quantum information processing in the act of creation. Neuroquantology. 2011;9(2):271–87.Google Scholar
  10. Courchesne E, Lincoln AJ, Townsend JP, et al. A new finding: impairment in shifting attention in autistic and cerebellar patients. In: Broman SH, Grafman J, editors. Atypical cognitive deficits in developmental disorders: implications for brain function. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1994. p. 101–37.Google Scholar
  11. Deuel RK. Autism: a cognitive developmental riddle. Pediatr Neurol. 2002;26:349–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feynman, R. P. The strange theory of light and matter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1985.Google Scholar
  13. Happé F. Annotation: current psychological theories of autism. The “theory of mind” account and rival theories. J Child Psychol Psych. 1994;35(2):215–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Happé F, Frith U. The weak coherence account: detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2006;36(1):16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson M. The development of visual attention: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. In: Cazzaniga MS, editor. The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995. p. 735–47.Google Scholar
  16. Landry R, Bryson SB. Impaired disengagement of attention in young children with autism. J Child Psychol Psych. 2004;45(6):115–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leslie A, Roth D. What autism teaches us about metarepresentation. In: Baron-Cohen S, Tager-Flusberg H, Cohen DJ, editors. Understanding other minds: perspectives from autism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993. p. 83–111.Google Scholar
  18. Lloyd S. Programming the universe. New York: Alfred E. Knopf; 2006.Google Scholar
  19. Kanner L. Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nerv Child. 1943;2:217–50.Google Scholar
  20. Ozonoff S, Strayer DL, McMahon W, et al. Executive function deficit in high functioning autistic individuals: relationship to theory of mind. J Child Psychol Psych. 1991;32:1081–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Padrón-Guillén J. Análisis del discurso e investigación social. Caracas: UNESR; 1996.Google Scholar
  22. Parker ST, et al., editors. Self-awareness in animals and humans. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1994.Google Scholar
  23. Perner J. Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT P; 1991.Google Scholar
  24. Piaget J. The origin of intelligence in children. New York: International University Press; 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Piaget J. The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books; 1954 (Original work published 1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pinker S. Words and rules: the ingredients of language. New York: Harper; 2000.Google Scholar
  27. Pinker S. The blank slate: the modern denial of human nature. New York: Penguin B; 2002.Google Scholar
  28. Povinelli DJ, Landau K, Perilloux HK. Self-recognition in young children using delayed versus live feedback: evidence of a developmental asynchrony. Child Dev. 1996;7:1540–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tager-Flusberg H. Dissociation in form and function in the acquisition of language by autistic children. In: Tager-Flusberg H, editor. Constraints on language acquisition: studies of atypical children. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1994. p. 175–94.Google Scholar
  30. Watson JS. Detection of self: the perfect algorithm. In: Parker ST, Mitchell WR, Boccia ML, editors. Self-awareness in animals and humans. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1994. p. 131–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zaitchik D. When representations conflict with reality: the preschooler’s problem with false beliefs and “false” photographs. Cognition. 1990;35:41–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mérida State Institute of Research of Social Intelligence and Autism (IMERISYA)Zea MéridaVenezuela

Personalised recommendations