Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship

2013 Edition
| Editors: Elias G. Carayannis

Convergent Versus Divergent Thinking

  • Kyung Hee KimEmail author
  • Robert A. Pierce
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_22


Convergent and divergent thinking are two poles on a spectrum of cognitive approaches to problems and questions (Duck 1981). On the divergent end, thinking seeks multiple perspectives and multiple possible answers to questions and problems. On the other end of the spectrum, convergent thinking assumes that a question has one right answer and that a problem has a single solution (Kneller 1971). Divergent thinking generally resists the accepted ways of doing things and seeks alternatives. Convergent thinking, the bias of which is to assume that there is a correct way to do things, is inherently conservative; it begins by assuming that the way things have been done is the right way. Divergent thinkers are better at finding additional ideas, whereas convergent thinkers have a more difficult time finding additional ideas. Convergent thinkers run out of ideas before divergent thinkers. However, convergent thinking strengthens the ability to bring closure and to conclude problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Andersen L, Kim KH Are creatively gifted students different from academically gifted students. in press.Google Scholar
  2. Duck L. Teaching with charisma. Burke: Chatelaine Press; 1981.Google Scholar
  3. Kim KH. The creativity crisis: the decrease in creative thinking scores on the torrance tests of creative thinking. Creat Res J. 2011;23(4):1–11.Google Scholar
  4. Kim KH, Pierce RA. Torrance’s innovator meter and the decline of creativity in America. In: Shavinina LV, editor. The international handbook of innovation education. New York: Taylor & Francis/Routledge; 2012.Google Scholar
  5. Kneller GF. Introduction to the philosophy of education. 2 ed., rev. New York: Wiley; 1971.Google Scholar
  6. Kuhn T. The structures of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962.Google Scholar
  7. Schumpeter JA. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York/London: Harper & Brothers; 1942.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The College of William and MaryWilliamsburgUSA
  2. 2.Christopher Newport UniversityNewport NewsUSA