Computational Complexity

2012 Edition
| Editors: Robert A. Meyers (Editor-in-Chief)

Social Phenomena Simulation

  • Paul Davidsson
  • Harko Verhagen
Reference work entry

Article Outline


Definition of the Subject


Why Simulate Social Phenomena?

Simulating Social Phenomena

Future Directions

Further Reading



Cellular Automaton Social Phenomenon Social Simulation Artificial Society Virtual Reality Software 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.
    Alexander JC, Giesen B, Münch R, Smelser NJ (eds) (1987) The Micro-Macro Link.University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barricelli NA (1957) Symbiogenetic evolution processes realized by artificial methods.Methodos 9(35–36):143–182Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brouwers L, Verhagen H (2004) Applying the Consumat model to flood management policies.In: Müller J, Seidel M (eds) 4th Workshop on Agent-Based Simulation. SCS,Montpellier, pp 29–34Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carley KM, Prietula M (eds) (1994) Computational Organization Theory. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davidsson P (2000) Multi-agent-based simulation: beyond social simulation. In: Moss S,Davidsson P (eds) Multi-Agent-Based Simulation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1979.Springer, Berlin, pp 98–107Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davidsson P (2002) Agent-based social simulation: a computer science view. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 5(1)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davidsson P, Holmgren J, Kyhlbäck H, Mengistu D, Persson M (2007) Applications of multi-agent-based simulation. In: Antunes L, Takadama K (eds) Multi-Agent-Based Simulation VII. LectureNotes in Computer Science, vol 4442. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Epstein JM, Axtell RL (1996) Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from theBottom Up. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fiedrich F, Burghardt P (2007) Emergency response information systems: emerging trendsand technologies: agent-based systems for disaster management. Commun ACM 50(3):41–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Galam S (2008) Sociophysics: a review of Galam models. arXiv:0803.1800 Accessed 06 Aug 2008
  11. 11.
    Gilbert N (1994) Computer Simulation of Social Processes. Social Research Update, Issue6, Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, UK. Accessed 06 Aug 2008
  12. 12.
    Gilbert N, Troitzsch KG (2005) Simulation for the Social Scientist, 2nd edn. OpenUniversity Press, MaidenheadGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guye-Vuillème A (2004) Simulation of nonverbal social interaction and small groupsdynamics in virtual environments. Ph D thesis, Ècole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, No 2933Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Janssen MA, Jager W (1999) An Integrated Approach to Simulating Behavioural Processes:A Case Study of the Lock-in of Consumption Patterns. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 2(2)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Künzel J, Hämmer V (2006) Simulation in university education: the artificial agent PSIas a teaching tool. Simulation 82(11):761–768Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lansing JS (2002) “Artificial societies” and the social sciences. Artif Life 8:279–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Macy MW, Willer R (2002) From factors to actors: computational sociology andagent-based modeling. Annu Rev Sociol 28:143–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Massaguer D, Balasubramanian V, Mehrotra S, Venkatasubramanian N (2006) Multi-agentsimulation of disaster response. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on AgentTechnology for Disaster Management 2006. HakodateGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Méndez G, Rickel J, de Antonio A (2003) Steve meets Jack: the integration of anintelligent tutor and a virtual environment with planning capabilities. In: Intelligent VirtualAgents. Lecture Notes on Artificial Intelligence, vol 2792. Springer, Berlin, pp 325–332Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Newell A (1994) Unified Theories of Cognition. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parunak HVD, Savit R, Riolo RL (1998) Agent-based modeling vs. equation‐basedmodeling: a case study and users' guide. In: Sichman JS, Conte R, Gilbert N (eds) Multi-AgentSystems and Agent-Based Simulation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1534. Springer, Berlin,pp 10–26Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Prietula MJ, Carley KM, Gasser L (eds) (1998) Simulating Organizations: ComputationalModels of Institutions and Groups. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Raney B, Cetin N, Völlmy A, Vrtic M, Axhausen K, Nagel K (2003) An Agent-BasedMicrosimulation Model of Swiss Travel: First Results. J Netw Spatial Econ 3(1):23–41Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reynolds CW (1987) Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model.Comput Graph 21(4):25–34 (SIGGRAPH '87 Conference Proceedings) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rickel J, Lewis Johnson W (1999) Animated agents for procedural training in virtualreality: perception, cognition, and motor control. Appl Artif Intell 13:343–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sawyer RK (2003) Artificial societies – multi-agent systems and the micro-macro linkin sociological theory. Sociol Meth Res 31(3):325–363MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schelling TC (1971) Dynamic models of segregation. J Math Sociol 1(1):143–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stone B (2005) Serious gaming. Def Manag J (31):142–144Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Takahashi T (2007) Agent based disaster simulation evaluation and its probability modelinterpretation. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intelligent Human‐Computer Systems for CrisisResponse and Management, 2007, Deltft, pp 369–376Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Takahashi S, Sallach D, Rouchier J (2007) Advancing Social Simulation – The FirstWorld Congress. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Williams R (1993) An agent based simulation environment for public order managementtraining. In: Western Simulation Multiconference, Object‐Oriented Simulation Conference (OOS '93), San Diego151–156Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yergens D, Hiner J, Denzinger J, Noseworthy T (2006) IDESS – A multi-agent-basedsimulation system for rapid development of infectious disease models. Int Trans Syst Sci Appl 1(1):51–58Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Davidsson
    • 1
  • Harko Verhagen
    • 2
  1. 1.Blekinge Institute of TechnologyRonnebySweden
  2. 2.Stockholm University and Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden