Encyclopedia of Systems and Control

Editors: John Baillieul, Tariq Samad

Model Order Reduction: Techniques and Tools

  • Peter Benner
  • Heike Faßbender
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5102-9_142-1

Abstract

Model order reduction (MOR) is here understood as a computational technique to reduce the order of a dynamical system described by a set of ordinary or differential-algebraic equations (ODEs or DAEs) to facilitate or enable its simulation, the design of a controller, or optimization and design of the physical system modeled. It focuses on representing the map from inputs into the system to its outputs, while its dynamics are treated as a black box so that the large-scale set of describing ODEs/DAEs can be replaced by a much smaller set of ODEs/DAEs without sacrificing the accuracy of the input-to-output behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Antoulas A (2005) Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems. SIAM, PhiladelphiaCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Benner P (2006) Numerical linear algebra for model reduction in control and simulation. GAMM Mitt 29(2):275–296MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Benner P, Quintana-Ortí E, Quintana-Ortí G (2000) Balanced truncation model reduction of large-scale dense systems on parallel computers. Math Comput Model Dyn Syst 6:383–405CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Benner P, Mehrmann V, Sorensen D (2005) Dimension reduction of large-scale systems. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol 45. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  5. Benner P, Kressner D, Sima V, Varga A (2010) Die SLICOT-Toolboxen für Matlab (The SLICOT-Toolboxes for Matlab) [German]. at-Automatisierungstechnik 58(1):15–25. English version available as SLICOT working note 2009-1, 2009, http://slicot.org/working-notes/
  6. Benner P, Hochstenbach M, Kürschner P (2011) Model order reduction of large-scale dynamical systems with Jacobi-Davidson style eigensolvers. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications, Computing and Control Applications (CCCA), March 3-5, 2011 at Hammamet, Tunisia, IEEE Publications (6 pages)Google Scholar
  7. Freund R (2003) Model reduction methods based on Krylov subspaces. Acta Numer 12:267–319CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Glover K (1984) All optimal Hankel-norm approximations of linear multivariable systems and their L norms. Internat J Control 39:1115–1193CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Golub G, Van Loan C (2013) Matrix computations, 4th edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Gugercin S, Antoulas AC, Beattie C (2008) \(\mathcal{H}_{2}\) model reduction for large-scale dynamical systems. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl 30(2):609–638Google Scholar
  11. Obinata G, Anderson B (2001) Model reduction for control system design. Communications and Control Engineering Series. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ruhe A, Skoogh D (1998) Rational Krylov algorithms for eigenvalue computation and model reduction. Applied Parallel Computing. Large Scale Scientific and Industrial Problems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1541. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 491–502Google Scholar
  13. Schilders W, van der Vorst H, Rommes J (2008) Model order reduction: theory, research aspects and applications. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Varga A (1991) Balancing-free square-root algorithm for computing singular perturbation approximations. In: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE CDC, Brighton, pp 1062–1065Google Scholar
  15. Varga A (1995) Enhanced modal approach for model reduction. Math Model Syst 1(2):91–105CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Varga A (2001) Model reduction software in the SLICOT library. In: Datta B (ed) Applied and computational control, signals, and circuits. The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 629. Kluwer Academic, Boston, pp 239–282Google Scholar
  17. Zhou K, Doyle J, Glover K (1996) Robust and optimal control. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Benner
    • 1
  • Heike Faßbender
    • 2
  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical SystemsMagdeburgGermany
  2. 2.Institut Computational MathematicsTechnische Universität BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany