| Editors: Thomas Hockey, Virginia Trimble, Thomas R. Williams, Katherine Bracher, Richard A. Jarrell, Jordan D. MarchéII, JoAnn Palmeri, Daniel W. E. Green
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Selected References
Bruno, Giordano (1888). Le opere italiane di Giordano Bruno. Göttingen: Dieterichsche Universitäts-buchhandlungGoogle Scholar
— (1975). The Ash Wednesday Supper, translated with an introduction and notes by Stanley L. Jaki. The Hague: Mouton. (Contains a useful introduction.)Google Scholar
— (1980). Opere Latine. Turin: Unione tipografico-editrice torineseGoogle Scholar
Danielson, Dennis (ed.) (2000). The Book of the Cosmos:Imagining the Universe from Heraclitus to Hawking. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Perseus, especially Chap. 23, “Innumerable Suns, and an Infinite Number of Stars” (an excerpt from De l’infinito universo et Mondi), pp. 140–144Google Scholar
Gatti, Hilary (1999). Giordano Bruno and Renaissance Science. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. (A high-quality scholarly book with useful bibliography.)MATHGoogle Scholar
McMullin, Ernan (1986). “Giordano Bruno at Oxford.” Isis 77: 85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
— (1987). “Bruno and Copernicus.” Isis 78: 55–74. (Helpful in clarifying the specific astronomical relationship of Bruno to the teaching of De revolutionibus.)Google Scholar
Michel, Paul Henri (1973). The Cosmology of Giordano Bruno, translated by R. E. W. Maddison. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University PressMATHGoogle Scholar
Singer, Dorothea Waley (1968). Giordano Bruno:His Life and Thought (with a translation of On the infinite universe and worlds). New York: GreenwoodGoogle Scholar
White, Michael (2002). The Pope and the Heretic: The True Story of Giordano Bruno, the Man Who Dared to Defy the Roman Inquisition. New York: William Morrow. (A partisan popularization typical of its genre and with no concern for accuracy or balance.)Google Scholar
Yates, Frances A. (1964). Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition. (Reprint, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.) (The most influential study of Bruno of the late-20th century.)Google Scholar