Electrochemical Sensors for Monitoring Conditions of Lubricants
Introduction
Lubrication has improved from simple oils and greases to multiple viscosity lubricants with new, machinery and application-targeted additives. Rather than make the task of machine reliability easier, lubricant selection options have become more complex. Coinciding with the growing complexity of lubricants the ability to detect and predict equipment failure has been an area of growing interest. The commercial and industrial sector is now embracing condition-based maintenance and prognostic technologies as the key to enhanced competitiveness.
Lubricants provide vital functions in mechanical systems such as separating moving parts, suspending contaminate, neutralizing corrosive acids, protecting wear surfaces, dissipating heat, and other performance-enhancing features. Ultimately, lubricants reach the end of their useful life due to a variety of degradation mechanisms leading to the increase in oxidation and nitration, base depletion, acid build up, soot contamination, water,...
References
- 1.Cipris D, Walsh A, Palanisamy T (1990) In: Turner DR (ed) Sensors for motor oil quality. The electrochemical society proceedings series, Pennington, PV 87–9:401Google Scholar
- 2.Wang SS, Lee HS, Smolenski DJ (1994) The development of in situ electrochemical oil-condition sensors. Sens Actuators B 17:179–185. doi:10.1016/0925-4005(93)00867-XGoogle Scholar
- 3.Wang SS, Lee HS (1997) The application of a.c. impedance technique for detecting glycol contamination in engine oil. Sens Actuators B 40:193–197. doi:10.1016/S0925-4005(97)80261-4Google Scholar
- 4.Smolenski DJ, Schwartz SE (1994) Automotive engine-lubricant condition monitoring. In: Booser ER (ed) CRC handbook of lubrication and tribology, vol 3., pp 17–32Google Scholar
- 5.Lvovich VF, Smiechowski MF (2006) Impedance characterization of industrial lubricants. Electrochim Acta 51:1487–1496. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.135Google Scholar
- 6.Wang S (2001) Road tests of oil condition sensor and sensing technique. Sens Actuators B 73:106–111. doi:10.1016/S0925-4005(00)00660-2Google Scholar
- 7.Smiechowski M, Lvovich V (2003) Iridium oxide sensors for acidity and basicity detection in industrial lubricants. Sens Actuators B 96:261–267. doi:10.1016/S0925-4005(03)00542-2Google Scholar
- 8.Smiechowski M, Lvovich V (2002) Electrochemical monitoring of water-surfactant interactions in industrial lubricants. J Electroanal Chem 534:171–180. doi:10.1016/S0022-0728(02)01106-3Google Scholar
- 9.Smiechowski MF, Lvovich VF (2005) Characterization of non-aqueous dispersions of carbon black nanoparticles by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. J Electroanal Chem 577:67–78. doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2004.11.015Google Scholar
- 10.Lvovich VF (2012) Impedance spectroscopy: applications to electrocehmical and dielectric phenomena. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- 11.Jakoby B, Vellekoop MJ (2004) Physical sensors for water-in-oil emulsions. Sens Actuators A 110:28–32. doi:10.1016/j.sna.2003.08.005Google Scholar
- 12.Boyle FP, Lvovich VF, Humphrey BK, Goodlive SA (2004) On-board sensor systems to diagnose condition of diesel engine lubricants-focus on soot. SAE technical paper 2004-01-3010. doi: 10.4271/2004-01-3010Google Scholar
- 13.Ulrich C, Petersson H, Sundgren H, Björefors F, Krantz-Rülker C (2007) Simultaneous estimation of soot and diesel contamination in engine oil using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Sens Actuators B 127:613–618. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2007.05.014Google Scholar
- 14.Ulrich C et al (2012) Evaluation of industrial cutting fluids using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and multivariate data analysis. Talanta 97:478–472. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2012.05.001Google Scholar
- 15.Seyfert C, Kesseler A, Luther R, Meindorf T (2002) Sensors for on-line monitoring of bio-degradable hydraulic oils. Olhydraul Pneum 47:1–15Google Scholar
- 16.Duchowski JK, Mannebach H (2006) A novel approach to predictive maintenance: a portable, multi-component MEMS sensor for on-line monitoring of fluid condition in hydraulic and lubricating systems. Tribol Trans 49:545–553. doi:10.1080/10402000600885183Google Scholar
- 17.Day M, Bauer C (2007) Water contamination in hydraulic and lube systems. Practicing oil analysis. http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/1084/water-contamination-lube. Accessed 11 Dec 2012
- 18.Duchowski J (2006) Sensors eye fluids and lubricants. Mach Des 78:88–96Google Scholar
- 19.Lee HS, Wang S, Smolenski D, Viola M, Klusendorf E (1994) In situ monitoring of high-temperature degraded engine oil condition with microsensors. Sens Actuators B 20:49–54. doi:10.1016/0925-4005(93)01168-4Google Scholar
- 20.Wideraa J, Riehlb BL, Johnson JM, Hansenb DC (2008) State-of-the-art monitoring of fuel acidity. Sens Actuators B 130:871–881. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2007.10.056Google Scholar
- 21.Saloka GS, Meitzler AH (1991) A capacitive lubricant deterioration sensor. SAE paper #910497, proceedings of SAE international congress, Detroit, 25 Feb – March 1, pp 137–146Google Scholar
- 22.Turner JD, Austin L (2003) Electrical techniques for monitoring the condition of lubrication oil. Meas Sci Technol 14:1794–1800. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/14/10/308Google Scholar
- 23.Discenzo F et al (2007) Dissolved wear metal monitoring in lubricating fluids. In: ASME/STLE 2007 International joint tribology conference, San Diego, pp 989–991. doi:10.1115/IJTC2007-44102Google Scholar
- 24.Agoston A, Dörr N, Jakoby B (2007) Corrosion sensors for engine oils – laboratory evaluation and field tests. Sens Actuators B 127:15–21. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2007.07.041Google Scholar
- 25.Agoston A, Svasek E, Jakoby B (2005) Novel sensor monitoring corrosion effects of lubrication oil in an integrating manner. In: Proceedings of the IEEE sensors 2005, 0-7803-9057-1, pp 1120–1123Google Scholar
- 26.Peratec (1994) Automatic on-line fluid monitoring. Ind Lubr Tribol 46:8–9. doi:10.1108/00368799410781124Google Scholar