Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders

2013 Edition
| Editors: Fred R. Volkmar

Index of Productive Syntax (IPSyn)

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1698-3_1670




Index of Productive Syntax (IPSyn) is a method for evaluating and quantifying the grammatical complexity of young children’s spontaneous language samples. IPSyn is based upon the grammatical categories and developmental scheme of Assigning Structural Stage (Miller, 1981). Individual utterances in a sample are scored for the occurrence of 60 different syntactic forms categorized under four subscales: noun phrase, verb phrase, question/negation, and sentence structure forms. Although IPSyn was developed for use with mainstream English speakers, it has been found to be a valid measure for children who speak African American English (Oetting et al., 2010).

IPSyn scores are calculated from children’s spontaneous language samples. After a sample is elicited and recorded, a corpus is formed by transcribing 100 successive, intelligible utterances, excluding imitations, self-repetitions, and routines (stereotyped language that does not represent productive language...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References and Readings

  1. Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Klee, T., & Fitzgerald, M. (1985). The relation between grammatical development and mean length of utterance in morphemes. Journal of Child Language, 12, 251–269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Klee, T., & Sahlie, E. (1986). Review of Hixson’s DSS computer program. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 2, 231–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lee, L. (1974). Developmental Sentence Analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Long, S. H., Fey, M. E., & Channell, R. W. (2006). Computerized profiling (PC Version 970). Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University. Website: http://www.computerizedprofiling.org.
  6. Miller, J. F. (1981). Assessing Language Production in Children. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  7. Oetting, J. B., Newkirk, B. L., Hartfield, L. R., Wynn, C. G., Pruitt, S. L., & Garrity, A. W. (2010). Index of productive syntax for children who speak African American English. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 328–339. doi:10.1044/0161-1461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sagae, K., Lavie, A., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Automatic measurement of syntactic development in child language. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) (pp. 197–204), Ann Arbor, MI. Retrieved April 17, 2011 from http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/grasp/ac105-IPSyn.pdfk.
  9. Scarborough, H. S. (1990). Index of productive syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Scarborough, H. S., Rescorla, L., Tager-Flusberg, H., Fowler, A. E., & Sudhalter, V. (1991). The relation of utterance length to grammatical complexity in normal and language-disordered groups. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tager-Flusberg, H., & Calkins, S. (1990). Does imitation facilitate the acquisition of grammar? Evidence from a study of autistic, Down’s syndrome and normal children. Journal of Child Language, 17, 591–606.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tager-Flusberg, H., Calkins, S., Nolin, T., Baumberger, T., Anderson, J., & Chadwick-Dias, A. (1990). A longitudinal study of language acquisition in autistic and Down syndrome children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 1–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Speech Pathology & AudiologyMarquette UniversityMilwaukeeUSA