The gender intensification hypothesis states that girls and boys experience increased pressure to conform to culturally sanctioned gender roles during adolescence (Hill and Lynch 1983). These pressures are thought to come from a variety of sources and are intended to prepare adolescents for their adult roles as women and men. This essay summarizes the gender intensification hypothesis and reviews evidence for the intensification of gender-role identity, gender-role attitudes, and gendered behavior during adolescence. The essay concludes by considering limitations in current investigations of gender intensification and directions for future research.
The study of gender development is complicated because, although gender is one of the most well-recognized social categories, its identifiers are extremely diverse and multifaceted (Twenge 1999). Cultures identify “masculine” and “feminine” attributes by the likelihood that each attribute is associated with one sex and...
This research was supported, in part, by Award Number F31MH084476 from the National Institute of Mental Health to Heather A. Priess and by Award Number T32HD049302 from the Eunice Kennedy Schriver National Institute of Child Health And Human Development to Sara M. Lindberg. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health, the Eunice Kennedy Schriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, or the National Institutes of Health.
- Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 155–162.Google Scholar
- Boldizar, J. P. (1991). Assessing sex typing and androgyny in children: The Children’s Sex Role Inventory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 505–515.Google Scholar
- Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.Google Scholar
- Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In J. Brooks-Gunn & A. Petersen (Eds.), Girls at puberty: Biological and psychosocial perspectives (pp. 201–228). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53–69.Google Scholar
- Katz, P. A., & Ksansnak, K. R. (1994). Developmental aspects of gender role flexibility and traditionality in middle childhood and adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 30, 272–282.Google Scholar
- Leszczynski, J. P., & Strough, J. (2008). The contextual specificity of masculinity and femininity in early adolescence. Social Development, 17, 719–736.Google Scholar
- Lindberg, S. M., Grabe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2007). Gender, pubertal development, and peer sexual harassment predict objectified body consciousness in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 723–742.Google Scholar
- Lippa, R. A., & Connelly, S. C. (1990). Gender diagnosticity: A new Bayesian approach to gender-related individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1051–1065.Google Scholar
- Lobel, T. E., Nov-Krispin, N., Schiller, D., Lobel, O., & Feldman, A. (2004). Gender discriminatory behavior during adolescence and young adulthood: A developmental analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 535–546.Google Scholar
- Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., & Cheng, J. H. S. (2008). A multilevel perspective on gender in classroom motivation and climate: Potential benefits of male teachers for boys? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 78–95.Google Scholar
- McHale, S. M., Crouter, A. C., & Whiteman, S. D. (2003). The family contexts of gender development in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 12, 125–148.Google Scholar
- Signorella, M. L., & Frieze, I. H. (2008). Interrelations of gender schemas in children and adolescents: Attitudes, preferences, and self-perceptions. Social Behavior and Personality, 36, 941–954.Google Scholar
- Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
- Spence, J., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 42. (Ms. No. 617).Google Scholar
- Stough, J., Leszczynski, J. P., Neely, T. L., Flinn, J. A., & Margrett, J. (2007). From adolescence to later adulthood: Femininity, masculinity, and androgyny in six age groups. Sex Roles, 57, 385–396.Google Scholar
- Twenge, J. M. (1997a). Attitudes toward women, 1970–1995: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 35–51.Google Scholar
- Twenge, J. M. (1997b). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time. Sex Roles, 36, 305–325.Google Scholar
- Twenge, J. M. (1999). Mapping gender: The multifactorial approach and the organization of gender-related attributes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 285–502.Google Scholar