Meaningful Learning in Economic Games
In economic games (strategic interactions) played repeatedly, players can engage in some combination of strategy learning and meaningful learning. Strategy learning describes the process by which players gradually learn which strategy produces the highest payoffs in a particular game. Meaningful learning describes the process by which players come to understand meaningful principles (e.g., dominance, backward-induction, strategic signaling) that are relevant not only in the current game, but in others as well. Both strategy learning and meaningful learning can contribute to improved performance (i.e., convergence toward equilibrium) in a particular game. Meaningful learning is demonstrated when improved performance in one game transfers to a superficially different but strategically similar game (i.e., a game in which the same meaningful principle applies).
There is considerable evidence in psychology...
- Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Cooper, D. J., & Kagel, J. H. (2003). Lessons learned: Generalizing learning across games. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 93(2), 202–207.Google Scholar
- Goodman, J. S. (1998). The interactive effects of task and external feedback on practice performance and learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(3), 223–252.Google Scholar
- Holyoak, K. J., & Spellman, B. A. (1993). Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 265–315.Google Scholar
- Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122–1131.Google Scholar
- Rick, S., & Weber, R. (2010). Meaningful learning and transfer of learning in games played repeatedly without feedback. Games and Economic Behavior, 68(2), 716–730.Google Scholar