Skip to main content

Formal Learning Theory

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning
  • 320 Accesses

Synonyms

Machine inductive inference

Definition

Formal Learning Theory studies systems that convert a stream of data into successive hypotheses about the process generating the data.

Theoretical Background

The basic setup of Formal Learning Theory is illustrated by the following game.

Players: You versus us.

Game pieces: The collection of non-empty finite sets of natural numbers (N = 0, 1, 2, …).

How to play: We will covertly choose one finite set S along with an infinite sequence with range equal to S (e.g., we might choose S = {7, 8, 9} and the sequence 7, 7, 9, 9, 7, 8, 8, 7 …). Each time we announce the next member of the sequence you must guess the finite set we chose.

Who wins: You win on a given sequence if all but finitely many of your guesses are right. You win the whole game if no matter which set we choose, and no matter what sequence we use to present it to you, you win on that sequence. Otherwise, we win.

It is clear how to win this game; just conjecture the finite set...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 3,400.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 2,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blum, L., & Blum, M. (1975). Toward a mathematical theory of inductive inference. Information and Control, 28, 125–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, E. M. (1967). Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10, 447–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., Osherson, D. N., Royer, J. S., & Sharma, A. (1999). Systems that learn: An introduction to learning theory (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K. (1996). The logic of reliable inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E., & Osherson, D. N. (1998). Belief revision in the service of scientific discovery. Mathematical Social Sciences, 36, 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osherson, D., & Weinstein, S. (2008). Recognizing strong random reals. Review of Symbolic Logic, 1(1), 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1979). ‘Degree of confirmation’ and inductive logic. In Mathematics, matter, and method: Philosophical papers (2nd ed., Vol. I). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, E. (1983). Algorithmic program debugging. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, K., & Culicover, P. W. (1980). Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Osherson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Osherson, D., Weinstein, S. (2012). Formal Learning Theory. In: Seel, N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_444

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_444

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1427-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1428-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics