Skip to main content

Seamless Learning

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning

Synonyms

Blended learning; Flexible learning; Ubiquitous learning

Definition

Seamless learning bridges private and public learning spaces where learning happens through both individual and collective efforts, and across time and different contexts (such as in-school vs after-school, formal vs informal learning, physical world vs. virtual reality or cyberspace). Traditionally, formal learning is defined as learning that happens at a fixed time following predefined curricula or plan. Informal learning, on the other hand, means a mode of learning driven by self-interest outside of school environment, and is emergent in nature.

Theoretical Background

Seamless learning is marked by the continuity of learning experiences across different scenarios or contexts. The challenge is to enable learners to learn whatever they are curious about and to seamlessly switch between different contexts, such as between formal and informal contexts, between individual and social learning, and by extending...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 3,400.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 2,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson-Levitt, K. M. (2006). Ethnography. In P. B. Elmore, G. Camilli, & J. Green (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 279–298). Washington D.C/Mahwah: AERA & Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, T.-W., et al. (2006). One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience sampling method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9), 526–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, F. (2000). Methodological issues in the direct observation of parent–child interaction: Do observational findings reflect the natural behavior of participants? Journal of Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 3(3), 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. (1997). The national design experiments consortium: Final report. New York: Center for Children and Technology, Educational Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsch, D. (2001). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Human computer interaction in the new millennium (pp. 75–94). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Reframing research on learning with technology: in search of the meaning of cognitive tools. Instructional Science, 35(3), 207–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C. K., Seow, P., Zhang, B., So, H. J., Chen, W.-L., & Wong, L. H. (2010). Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 154–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. (1993). No distribution without individuals’ cognition: A dynamic interactional view. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition. Psychological and educational perspectives (pp. 111–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, S., & Rogers, Y. (2004). Let’s get physical: the learning benefits of interacting in digitally augmented physical spaces. Computers & Education, 43, 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. W. (2007). How computer games help children learn. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M. (2006). How can we address the conflicts between personal informal learning and traditional classroom education. In M. Sharples (Ed.), Big issues in mobile learning (pp. 21–24). Nottingham: LSRI, University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, K., & Klopfer, E. (2007). Augmented reality simulations on handheld computers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 371–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittrock, M. (Ed.). (1977). Learning and instruction. Berkeley: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chee-Kit Looi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Looi, CK., So, HJ., Chen, W., Zhang, B., Wong, LH., Seow, P. (2012). Seamless Learning. In: Seel, N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_251

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_251

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1427-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1428-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics