Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning

2012 Edition
| Editors: Norbert M. Seel

Mimicry in Social Interaction: Its Effect on Learning

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1798



Mimicry is an automatic and non-conscious process that occurs in many circumstances and in a wide variety of situations. According to Chartrand and van Baaren (2009), there are several theories of mimicry. Studies have demonstrated that mimicry is a communication tool used to create and regulate social interactions and show others that you understand them. It can truly be called “social glue” which helps to create strong ties and relationships between individuals. According to Chartrand and Bargh (1999), one of the key mechanisms of imitation is the desire for affiliation with the subject with whom one interacts. It seems that mimicry is an effective tool not only to create ties and social relationships, but also for maintaining them. A great deal of research has shown that non-conscious mimicry comes from the automatic link between perception and behavior. According to Bargh et al. (1996),...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype priming on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244.Google Scholar
  2. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.Google Scholar
  3. Chartrand, T.L., & van Baaren, R. (2009). Human mimicry. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 219–274). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  4. Guéguen, N., Jacob, C., & Martin, A. (2009). Mimicry in social interaction: Its effect on human judgment and behavior. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 253–259.Google Scholar
  5. Kouzakova, M. (2009). Subtle signs of exclusion: how lack of mimicry affects the self and other perception. Social Psychology Thesis. Netherlands: Radboud University Nijmegen, 128 p.Google Scholar
  6. LaFrance, M. (1979). Nonverbal synchrony and rapport: Analysis by the cross-lag panel technique. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 66–70.Google Scholar
  7. LaFrance, M. (1982). Posture mirroring and rapport. In M. Davis (Ed.), Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in commutative behavior (pp. 279–298). New York: Human Sciences.Google Scholar
  8. Martin (2010). L’effet Caméléon comme outil de prévention de l’obésité infantile. L’imitation, une nouvelle technique de soumission comportementale? Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of South Brittany.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CRPCC-LESTICUniversity of South BrittanyLorientFrance