Genetic Testing, Psychological Implications
Synonyms
Definition
Genetic testing, psychological implications refers to the potential cognitive and emotional consequences of undergoing genetic testing and learning the test result.
Description
Psychological Impact of Genetic Testing
The potential psychological impact of genetic testing can be affected by numerous factors including the purpose of testing and the test result as well as the individual’s expectations, perception of the disease in question, and coping style. In general, however, studies appear to indicate that although genetic testing may have an immediate negative effect for individuals receiving “bad news,” the long-term psychological impact is often negligible or even slightly positive (Broadstock, Michie, & Marteau, 2000; Cameron & Muller, 2009).
Pretest counseling is an important step to minimize the potential for negative effects. This discussion should include a review of the purpose of testing, potential results, and medical...
References and Readings
- Broadstock, M., Michie, S., & Marteau, T. (2000). Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: A systematic review. European Journal of Human Genetics, 8(10), 731–738.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cameron, L. D., & Muller, C. (2009). Psychosocial aspects of genetic testing. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22(2), 218–223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elger, B. S. (2010). Ethical, legal, and social issues in the genetic testing of minors. In K. P. Tercyak (Ed.), Handbook of genomics and the family: Psychosocial context for children and adolescents (pp. 485–521). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Fanos, J. H., Gronka, S., Wuu, J., Stanislaw, C., Andersen, P. M., & Benatar, M. (2011). Impact of presymptomatic genetic testing for familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Genetics in Medicine, 13(4), 342–348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gooding, H. C., Organista, K., Burack, J., & Biesecker, B. B. (2006). Genetic susceptibility testing from a stress and coping perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 62(8), 1880–1890.Google Scholar
- Hadley, D. W., Letocha Ersig, A. D., & Holohan Quattrocchi, M. K. (2010). Guidelines and policies on genetic testing in children and families. In K. P. Tercyak (Ed.), Handbook of genomics and the family: Psychosocial context for children and adolescents (pp. 523–557). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Lammens, C. R., Aaronson, N. K., Wagner, A., Sijmons, R. H., Ausems, M. G., Vriends, A. H., et al. (2010). Genetic testing in Li-Fraumeni syndrome: Uptake and psychosocial consequences. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28(18), 3008–3014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mariotti, C., Ferruta, A., Gellera, C., Nespolo, C., Fancellu, R., Genitrini, S., et al. (2010). Predictive genetic tests in neurodegenerative disorders: A methodological approach integrating psychological counseling for at-risk individuals and referring clinicians. European Neurology, 64(1), 33–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marteau, T. M., & Weinman, J. (2006). Self-regulation and the behavioural response to DNA risk information: A theoretical analysis and framework for future research. Social Science & Medicine, 62(6), 1360–1368.Google Scholar
- O’Daniel, J. M., Haga, S. B., & Willard, H. F. (2010). Considerations for the impact of personal genome information: A study of genomic profiling among genetics and genomics professionals. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19(4), 387–401.PubMedGoogle Scholar