Designing Interventional Environments in the Treatment of Cancer

  • Jeffrey BermanEmail author
  • Yuman Fong
Reference work entry


The last two decades have seen remarkable advances in imaging and procedural-guidance technology. Enhancements in computing, sensors, and data processing now allow many imaging modalities to produce information that can be displayed, transmitted, and utilized in real time. This has allowed the immediate use of imaging modalities to guide surgery and interventional therapies, with improvements in patient care and outcome. Until recently, diagnostic imaging, surgery, endoscopy, and interventional radiology had developed and evolved fairly independently. In the past, procedural rooms were generally designed with a single discipline in mind. We are now asked to construct enhanced work environments which support multidisciplinary workflow and novel-navigated therapeutic procedures. In these new image-enhanced working environments, the collection, processing, and display of information are rapidly evolving. Accompanying these changes in the workflow is increased demands on staff, on infrastructure, and on additional equipment needed to support integration of new technologies. This chapter discusses the design of these rooms. The goal in interventional OR design is to produce functional spaces that are safe and efficient and that have the capacity to support the development and evolution of new technologies and equipment with minimal construction changes.


Adjacent Room Imaging Equipment Interventional Suite Diagnostic Equipment Procedure Room 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Kpodonu J. Hybrid cardiovascular suite: the operating room of the future. J Card Surg. 2010;25(6):704–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sikkink CJ, Reijnen MM, Zeebregts CJ. The creation of the optimal dedicated endovascular suite. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;35(2):198–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonatti J, Vassiliades T, Nifong W, Jakob H, Erbel R, Fosse E, et al. How to build a cath-lab operating room. Heart Surg Forum. 2007;10(4):E344–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nollert G, Wich S. Planning a cardiovascular hybrid operating room: the technical point of view. Heart Surg Forum. 2009;12(3):E125–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hudorovic N, Rogan SA, Lovricevic I, Zovak M, Schmidt S. The vascular hybrid room – operating room of the future. Acta Clin Croat. 2010;49(3):289–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matern U, Koneczny S. Safety, hazards and ergonomics in the operating room. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(11):1965–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Facilities Guideline Institute. Guidelines for design and construction of health care facilities. Dallas: FGI; 2010.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fillinger MF, Weaver JB. Imaging equipment and techniques for optimal intraoperative imaging during endovascular interventions. Semin Vasc Surg. 1999;12(4):315–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Surgical lights. An illuminating look at the LED marketplace. Health Devices. 2010;39(11):390–402.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hadjipanayis CG, Jiang H, Roberts DW, Yang L. Current and future clinical applications for optical imaging of cancer: from intraoperative surgical guidance to cancer screening. Semin Oncol. 2011;38(1):109–18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Riley RH. Power failure to a tertiary hospital’s operating suite. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010;38(4):785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eichhorn JH, Hessel EA. Electrical power failure in the operating room: a neglected topic in anesthesia safety. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(6):1519–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dalstrom DJ, Venkatarayappa I, Manternach AL, Palcic MS, Heyse BA, Prayson MJ. Time-dependent contamination of opened sterile operating-room trays. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(5):1022–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lemke HU, Berliner L. PACS for surgery and interventional radiology: features of a therapy imaging and model management system (TIMMS). Eur J Radiol. 2011;78(2):239–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kranzfelder M, Schneider A, Gillen S, Feussner H. New technologies for information retrieval to achieve situational awareness and higher patient safety in the surgical operating room: the MRI institutional approach and review of the literature. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(3):696–705.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Balust J, Macario A. Can anesthesia information management systems improve quality in the surgical suite? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22(2):215–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seim AR, Sandberg WS. Shaping the operating room and perioperative systems of the future: innovating for improved competitiveness. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;23(6):765–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tamariz F, Merrell R, Popescu I, Onisor D, Flerov Y, Boanca C, et al. Design and implementation of a web-based system for intraoperative consultation. World J Surg. 2009;33(3):448–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jeffrey Berman ArchitectNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Surgery and RadiologyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations