Skip to main content

Graffiti Archaeology

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology

Introduction

Graffiti is an important source of material evidence through which archaeologists can learn about cultural identities and ideas. The tradition of graffiti goes back to ancient Greece and Rome, if not earlier (Baird & Taylor 2010). One of the renowned characteristics of Pompeii and Herculaneum is the wealth of political slogans and bawdy statements that are inscribed on the walls of buildings, both inside and outside (Benefiel 2010; UNESCO 2013). In contemporary societies, graffiti is widely perceived as undesirable and labeled as “vandalism” and often connected with feelings of adrenaline (O’Doherty 2012).

Archaeologists investigate the nexus of technique, form, and content of this visual culture to extract uncensored, uninstitutionalized information about attitudes toward social, political, religious, and ideological issues. Graffiti is a continuation of the landscape-marking and mark-making communication practices that have been used by humans for at least 40,000 years....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 5,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baird, J.A. & C. Taylor. (ed.) 2010. Ancient graffiti in context. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benefiel, R. 2010. Dialogues of graffiti in the House of the Four Styles at Pompeii (Casa Dei Quattro Stili, I. 8.17, 11), in J.A. Baird & C. Taylor (ed.) Ancient graffiti in context: 20-48. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. 2006. What does it mean to say that economics is performative?, in D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa & L. Siu (ed.) Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics: 1-58. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N. 2004. Actor network theory and media: do they connect and on what terms?, in A. Hepp et al. (ed.) Connectivity, networks and flows: 93-108. New York: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniell, C. 2011. Graffiti, calliglyphs and markers in the UK. Archaeologies 7(2): 454-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, B. & M. Wilson. 2002. Spaces of resistance: graffiti and Indigenous place markings in the early European contact period of northern Australia, in B. David & M. Wilson (ed.) Inscribed landscapes: marking and making place: 42-60. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, U.K. 2009. Revolution is the new black: graffiti/art and mark-making practices. Archaeologies 5(2): 210-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves-Brown, P. & J. Schofield. 2011. The filth and the fury: 6 Denmark Street (London) and the Sex Pistols. Antiquity 85(330): 1385-1401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. 2007.Actor network theory and material semiotics. Available at: http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2007ANTandMaterialSemiotics.pdf (accessed 16 March 2012).

  • Macdonald, N. 2001.The graffiti subculture: youth, masculinity and identity in London and New York. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J.J. 2012. Pictures of women: the social context of Australian rock art production, in J.J. McDonald & P.M. Veth (ed.) A companion to rock art (Blackwell Companions to Anthropology series): 214-36. Oxford, Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merril, S.O.C. & H. Hack. 2013. Exploring hidden narratives: conscript graffiti at the former military base ‘Kummersdorf’. Journal of Social Archaeology 13(1): 101-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, J. & T. Neal. 2010. Elbow grease and time to spare: the place of tree carving, in J. Oliver & T. Neal (ed.) Wild signs: graffiti in archaeology and history: 15-22. Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Doherty, S. 2012. Under siege? Exploring the hidden world of Irish graffiti artists. Socheolas. Limerick Student Journal of Sociology 4(2): 104-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouzman, S. 2010. Graffiti as art(e)fact: a contemporary archaeology. Paper presented at University of Johannesburg Sociology, Anthropology & Development Seminar, Johannesburg, 10 March, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, J. 2012. Convenient canvasses: an archaeology of social identity and contemporary graffiti in Jawoyn country, Northern Territory, Australia. Unpublished Honours dissertation, Department of Archaeology, Flinders University, Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. 2013. Archaeological areas of Pompei, Herculaneum and Torre Annunziata. Available at: http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/829 (accessed 2 June 2013).

  • Wobst, H.M. 1977. Stylistic behaviour and information exchange, in C.E. Cleland (ed.) Papers for the director: research papers in honour of James B. Griffin: 317-42. Michigan: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordan Ralph .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Ralph, J. (2014). Graffiti Archaeology. In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_551

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_551

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0426-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0465-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics