Introduction and Definition
The looting of archaeological sites is today one of the major threats to the world’s cultural heritage, second only to the intensification of agriculture and to urban development. Looting in this context may be defined as the unrecorded destruction of archaeological sites in order to provide artifacts for sale on the illicit market for antiquities. What is shocking is that it derives, in some senses, from the recognition of the value of these tangible components of the cultural heritage. But instead of encouraging the careful preservation of their context of discovery, the price that such collectibles can command leads to clandestine excavation and the sale of “unprovenanced” antiquities. Their true value, of course, lies in what, when properly understood in their context of discovery and fully published by competent researchers, they can tell us about the shared past of humankind. Their commercial value is what they can command on the market, sold by...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Balter, M. 2007. University suppresses report on provenance of Iraqi antiquities. Science 318: 554-5.
Bonhams. 2006. The Sevso treasure, a private exhibition. London: Bonhams.
Bottoni, A. & E. Setari. (ed.) 2009. I marmi dipinti di Ascoli Satriano. Rome: Ministero per I Beni e le Attività Culturali.
Brodie, N., Doole, J. & Renfrew C. (ed.) 2001. Trade in illicit antiquities: the destruction of the world’s archaeological heritage. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Brodie, N. & C. Renfrew. 2005. Looting and the world’s archaeological heritage, the inadequate response. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 343-61.
Brodie, N. & K.W. Tubb. (ed.) 2002. Illicit antiquities, the theft of culture and the extinction of archaeology. London: Routledge.
Gerstenblith, P. 2003. The Clain/Schultz doctrine: another step against the trade in stolen antiquities. Culture without Context 13: 5-8.
Gill, D. 2011. Due diligence and auction houses. Available at: www.davidgill.co.uk/looting/default/html.
O’Keefe, P. 1997.Trade in antiquities. Reducing destruction and theft. Paris: UNESCO.
Renfrew, C. 2000. Loot, legitimacy and ownership. London: Duckworth.
- 2010. Combating the illicit antiquities trade: progress and problems, in J. Papadopoulos & E. Proietti (ed.) International meeting on illicit traffic of cultural property. Rome: Gangemi Editore.
Renfrew, C. & P. Bahn. 2008.A rchaeology, theory methods and practice, 5th edn. London: Thames & Hudson.
Schøyen. 2005. An inquiry into the provenance of 654 incantation bowls delivered into the custody of UCL by or on the authority of Mr Martin Schøyen by D. Freeman, S. MacDonald and C. Renfrew. Inquiry established by the Provost of UCL on 14th February 2005. [Published by Wikileaks 2009: see ‘Schøyen’. Available in the House of Lords Library, London].
Silver, V. 2009. The lost chalice. New York: Harper Collins.
Watson, P. 1997.Sotheby’s, the inside story. NewYork: Random House.
Watson, P. & C. Todeschini. 2006. The Medici conspiracy, the illicit journey of looted antiquities. New York: Public Affairs.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Renfrew, C. (2014). Looting and Vandalism (Cultural Heritage Management). In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1216
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1216
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0426-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0465-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law