Berlyne, Daniel E.
- 251 Downloads
Basic Biographical Information
Daniel Ellis Berlyne was a motivation theorist, an experimentalist on various topics including aesthetics, and an active participant in the North American neobehavioral movement from the 1950s to the early 1970s. Born on April 25, 1924, in Salford, a suburb of Manchester in Northern England, Berlyne held several academic positions before becoming Professor of Psychology at the University of Toronto from 1962 until his death in 1976. Berlyne was truly an international scholar, having traveled all over the European continent and beyond (both in an academic capacity and during multiple posts during his service in World War II) prior to his arriving in Toronto.
In 1941, at the age of 17, Berlyne was awarded a Major Scholarship to Trinity College, Cambridge, to study modern languages. The start of his second year at Cambridge, however, was interrupted in the fall of 1942, because he was called up to serve during World War II. Upon his return to Cambridge, in...
References
- Barnes, M. E. (2007). Behaviorism and aesthetics? The life and career of Daniel E. Berlyne (Master’s thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. MR38746).Google Scholar
- Berlyne, D. E. (1949). ‘Interest’ as a psychological concept. British Journal of Psychology, 39, 184–195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Berlyne, D. E. (1963). Psychology in the U.S.S.R. The Canadian Psychologist, 4, 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Berlyne, D. E. (1965). Structure and direction in thinking. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
- Berlyne (1973, Oct 14). Interview by Roger C. Myers with Daniel E. Berlyne. [Textual record and sound record]. Oral History of Psychology in Canada (R4919-15-8-E, Vol. 24, File 24–8, 24–9). Canadian Psychological Association, Library and Archives Canada (LAC), Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
- Berlyne, D. E. (Ed.). (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
- Berlyne, D. E. (1975). Cognitive theory? Humanistic psychology? – To hull with them all! Canadian Psychological Review, 16, 69–80.Google Scholar
- Berlyne, D. E., & Piaget, J. (1960). Théorie du comportement et opérations. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
- Brown, J. S. (1961). The motivation of behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bunn, G. C., Lovie, A. D., & Richards, G. D. (Eds.). (2001). Psychology in Britain: Historical essays and personal reflections. Leicester: British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
- Cupchik, G. C. (1986). A decade after Berlyne: new directions in experimental aesthetics. Poetics, 15, 345–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cupchik, G. C. (1988). The legacy of Daniel E Berlyne. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 6, 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Day, H. I. (1977). In memoriam: Daniel Ellis Berlyne (1924–1976). Motivation and Emotion, 1, 377–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Furedy, J. J., & Furedy, C. P. (1981). “My first interest is interest”: Berlyne as an exemplar of the curiosity drive. In H. I. Day (Ed.), Advances in intrinsic motivation and aesthetics (pp. 1–17). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
- Konečni, V. (1978). Daniel E Berlyne: 1924–1976. American Journal of Psychology, 91, 133–137.Google Scholar
- Silvia, P. J. (2005). Cognitive appraisals and interest in visual art: exploring an appraisal theory of aesthetic emotions. Empirical studies of the Arts, 23, 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walker, E. L. (1961). Quest for stability and change [Review of D. E. Berlyne, Conflict, arousal, and curiosity (1960)]. Contemporary Psychology, 6, 145–147.Google Scholar
- Walker, E. L. (1980). Berlyne’s theoretical contributions to psychology. Motivation and Emotion, 4, 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar