Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

2011 Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Simon of Faversham

  • John L Longeway
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_467

Abstract

Simon of Faversham, c. 1260–1306, was a commentator on Aristotle’s works, particularly in logic and on the soul. He taught at Oxford, primarily in the Arts, and although he took the degree in Theology and became Chancellor of the university, almost none of his work outside the Arts survives. His initial formation seems to have been Thomist, whom he follows in his Avicennan understanding of universals, but in his later writings he took issue with Aquinas on the real distinction, following Henry of Ghent, and absorbed much from Giles of Rome. Nonetheless, even in his later works, he takes distinctively Thomist positions in his Posterior Analytics commentary, favoring Thomas over Grosseteste and Giles of Rome on the nature of the highest sort of demonstration and the use of the fourth kind of per se statement in demonstration. These were major points of controversy, and Simon’s positions reflect the dominance of the Thomistic view of them in later Scholastic work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  1. DeRijk Lambertus Marie (1968) On the genuine text of Peter of Spain’s Summule logicales. II: Simon of Faversham (d. 1306) as a commentator of the tracts I–V of the Summule. Vivarium 6:69–101Google Scholar
  2. Ebbesen Sten (1980) Gerontobiologiens grundproblemer. Mus Tuscul 40–43:269–288 (extracts from Simon’s quaestiones on De longitudine et brevitate vitae)Google Scholar
  3. Longeway John L: John Longeway’s website at University of Wisconsin at Parkside, http://uwp.edu/~longeway/, has working translations of a number of Simon’s works, in particular, both his Posterior Analytics commentaries and the Sophisma: Universale est intentio
  4. Longeway John L (1977) Simon of Faversham’s questions on the posterior analytics: a thirteenth-century view of science. PhD thesis, Cornell University (Dissertation Abstracts International 38.7:4211-A)Google Scholar
  5. Ottaviano Carmelo (1930) Le Quaestiones super libro Praedicamentorum di Simone di Faversham. In: Atti della Reale Accademia Nazionale die Lincei, serie 6, Memorie della Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche, vol 3, pp 257–351Google Scholar
  6. Pinborg Jan (1971) Simon of Faversham’s sophisma: Universale est Intentio: a supplementary note. Mediaev Stud 33:360–365Google Scholar
  7. Sharp D (1934) Simonis de Faverisham Quaestiones super tertium De anima. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 9:307–368 (edition of Book III from one manuscript)Google Scholar
  8. Simon of Faversham (1957) Magistri Simonis Anglici sive de Faverisham Opera omnia, vol 1: Opera logica, tomus Prior, (1) Quaestiones super libro Porphyrii, (2) Quaestiones super libro Praedicamentorum, (3) Quaestiones super libro Perihermeneias. In: Mazzarella P (ed) Pubblicazioni dell’Instituto universitario di magistero di Catania, serie filosofica, testi critici, 1. Cedam, PaduaGoogle Scholar
  9. Simon of Faversham (1984) In: Ebbesen S, Izbicki T, Longeway J, del Punta F, Serene E, Stump E (eds) Quaestiones super libro Elenchorum. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  10. Vennebusch Joachim (1963) Ein anonymer Aristoteleskommentar des xiii. Jahrhunderts: Quaestiones in tres libros de Anima (Admont: Stiftsbibliothek, cod. lat. 367), F. Schöningh, Paderborn. (pp 25–27, one question from Simon’s commentary)Google Scholar
  11. Vennebusch Joachim (1965) Die Quaestiones in tres libros De anima des Simon von Faversham. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 47:20–39 (Lists the questions in Simon’s commentary)Google Scholar
  12. Wolf Friedrich Antonius (1966) Die Intellektslehre des Simon von Faversham nach seinem De-anima-Kommentaren. Inaugural dissertation, Universität, Bonn (excerpts from both the literal and the question commentaries on De anima, and an appendix editing three questions from the latter)Google Scholar
  13. Yokoyama Tetsuo (1969) Simon of Faversham’s sophisma: Universale est intentio. Medieval Stud 31:1–14 (an edition of the work. See Pinborg (1971) for corrections)Google Scholar
  14. Zimmermann Albert (1971) Verzeichnis Ungedruckter Kommentare zur Metaphysik und Physik des Aristoteles aus der Zeit von etwa 1250–1350, Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, 8/9. Brill, Leiden/Cologne (see pp 10, 32–33, 190–196)Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Simon of Faversham (2007). In: The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Longeway J, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simon-faversham/

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • John L Longeway
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of WisconsinKenoshaUSA