Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

2011 Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Divine Power

  • Jeffrey C. Witt
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_145


The explicitly scholastic Divine Power distinction developed out of the twelfth century theological discussion of the nature of God’s power. At issue, initially, was the desire to preserve the constancy of God’s nature and yet to preserve his freedom from any sense of necessity. The distinction emphasized the difference between what God’s raw power was capable of and God’s power as identified with what he actually wills. The understanding of this distinction was later influenced by canonist discussions of papal power, and the distinction often came to be interpreted as two different powers that belonged to God. The development of this later understanding is frequently viewed as playing an important role in the emergence of the modern period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


Primary Sources

  1. Abelard Peter (1987) Theologia ‘scholarium’. In: Opera theologica: Corpus christianorum continuation mediaevalis, tom XIII, ed. Buytaert EM, Mews CJ. Brepols, TurnholtGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander of Hales (1924) Summa Halensis, ed. Quaracchi. Collegium S. Bonaventurae, Quaracchi, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  3. Duns Scotus John (1963) Ordinatio I. In: Opera omnia, Vol VI, ed. Balic C. Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis, Civitas VaticanaGoogle Scholar
  4. Duns Scotus John (1997) On the will and morality, ed. Frank W, trans. Wolter A. Catholic University of America Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. Lombard Peter (1971–1981) Liber I sententiarum, 3rd edn, ed. Quaracchi. Collegium S. Bonaventurae, Quaracchi, FlorenceGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Courtenay WJ (1984) Covenant and causality in medieval thought: studies in philosophy, theology, and economic practice. Variorum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Courtenay WJ (1990) Capacity and volition: a history of the distinction of absolute and ordained power. Pierluigi Lubrina, BergamoGoogle Scholar
  3. Duhem P (1985) Medieval cosmology: theories of infinity, place, time, void, and the plurality of worlds, ed. Ariew R. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. Gelber HG (2004) It could have been otherwise: contingency and necessity in Dominican theology at Oxford 1300–1350. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  5. Grant E (1971) Physical science in the Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Moonan L (1994) Divine power: the medieval power distinction up to its adoption by Albert, Bonaventure, and Aquinas. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Oakley F (1984) Omnipotence, covenant, and order: an excursion in the history of ideas from Abelard to Leibniz. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  8. Oberman H (1963) The harvest of medieval theology: Gabriel Biel and late medieval nominalism. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Rudavsky T (1985) Divine omniscience and omnipotence in medieval philosophy: Islamic, Jewish, and Christian perspectives. D. Reidel, DordrechtGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey C. Witt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyBoston CollegeChestnut Hill, MAUSA