Encyclopedia of Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism

2007 Edition
| Editors: David Gubbins, Emilio Herrero-Bervera

Reduction to Pole

  • Dhananjay Ravat
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4423-6_275
Introduced by Baranov ( 1957) (see also, Baranov and Naudy, 1964), the reduction‐to‐pole transformation of total field magnetic anomalies (see crustal magnetic field) is intended to remove the skewness of the anomalies (see Figure R1). The transformation makes the anomalies overlie the sources, makes it possible to correlate the magnetic anomalies with other types of geophysical anomalies (e.g., gravity) and geological information, and aids their interpretation. In reality, even the amplitude of the anomaly is affected (increased) when sources of induced magnetization are observed at poles in comparison to lower magnetic latitudes because the Earth's field intensity increases from equator to poles; some of the reduction‐to‐pole methods can take this change in amplitude into account (e.g., equivalent source method) while the others typically do not (e.g., rectangular coordinate wavenumber domain methods). The expression of a magnetic anomaly, Δ T, due to a localized spherical source of...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Arkani‐Hamed, J., 1988. Differential reduction‐to‐the‐pole of regional magnetic anomalies. Geophysics, 53: 1592–1600.Google Scholar
  2. Baranov, V., 1957. A new method for interpretation of aeromagnetic maps: pseudo‐gravimetric anomalies. Geophysics, 22: 359–383.Google Scholar
  3. Baranov, V., and Naudy, H., 1964. Numerical calculation of the formula of reduction to the magnetic pole. Geophysics, 29: 67–79.Google Scholar
  4. Blakely, R.J., 1995. Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dampney, C.N.G., 1969. The equivalent source technique. Geophysics, 34: 39–53.Google Scholar
  6. Emilia, D.A., 1973. Equivalent sources used as an analytic base for processing total magnetic field profiles. Geophysics, 38: 339–348.Google Scholar
  7. von Frese, R.R.B., Hinze, W.J., and Braile, L.W., 1981. Spherical earth gravity and magnetic anomaly analysis by equivalent point source inversion. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 53: 69–83.Google Scholar
  8. von Frese, R.R.B., Ravat, D., Hinze, W.J., and McGue, C.A., 1988. Improved inversion of geopotential field anomalies for lithospheric investigations. Geophysics, 53: 375–385.Google Scholar
  9. Hansen, R.O., and Pawlowski, R.S., 1989. Reduction to the pole at low latitudes by Wiener filtering. Geophysics, 54: 1607–1613.Google Scholar
  10. Silva, B.C.J., 1986. Reduction to the pole as an inverse problem and its application to low latitude anomalies. Geophysics, 51: 369–382.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dhananjay Ravat

There are no affiliations available