Skip to main content

Civil Society Indicators and Indexes

  • Reference work entry

Introduction

For most of its history, the concept of civil society has been confined to the realms of political theory and philosophy. From the thinkers of the Scottish Enlightenment via Gramsci’s cultural hegemony perspective to the revival of the term by Eastern European dissidents in the 1980s, civil society was always used in the context of imagining a normative ideal-type society. In addition, these various philosophical traditions differed quite strongly in their definition of the concept and its boundaries, leading commentators to lament the conceptual confusion around the term and questioning its usefulness for contemporary sociopolitical analysis (Knight & Hartnell, 2001; Grimond, 2002).

Given this ideological and normative baggage, the operationalization of the concept for empirical research – a necessary prerequisite for the development of indicators and indices – is an extremely challenging undertaking. In fact, the applicability and relevance of civil society for...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   1,100.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References/Further Readings

  • Anheier, H., & Stares, S. (2002). Introducing the global civil society index. In H. Anheier, M. Glasius, & M. Kaldor (Eds.), Global civil society yearbook (pp. 241–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H. K. (2004). Civil society: Measurement, evaluation, policy. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H. K. (2005). Measure for measure: A commentary on Heinrich and the state of civil society indicators research. Journal of Civil Society, 1(3), 241–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. (2004). Civil society. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, M. W., & Edwards, B. (1998). Beyond Tocqueville. Civil society and social capital in comparative perspective. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimond, J. (2002). Civil society.  The Economist, The World in 2002. London: The Economist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, V. F. (2004). Assessing and strengthening civil society worldwide. A project description of the CIVICUS civil society index: A participatory needs assessment & action-planning tool for civil society. Johannesburg: CIVICUS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, V. F. (2005). Studying civil society across the world. Exploring the thorny issues of conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Civil Society, 1(3), 211–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, V. F. (2008). What makes civil society strong? Measuring and analysing the strength of civil society across the world. Ph.D. thesis. Fernuniversität Hagen, Hagen: forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M. M. (2003). The weakness of civil society in post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M. M. (2005). Conceptual and methodological suggestions for improving cross-national measures of civil society: Commentary on Heinrich. Journal of Civil Society, 1(3), 229–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, B., & Hartnell, C. (2001). ‘Civil society – Is it anything more than a metaphor for hope for a better world?’ Alliance, 6(4), 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubik, J. (2005). How to study civil society: The state of the art and what to do next. East European Politics & Societies, 19, 105–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2002). Democratic Phoenix. Reinventing political activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work – Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. (1997). Defining the nonprofit sector. A cross-national analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., & Sokolowski, S. W. (2004). Measuring civil society: The Johns Hopkins Global Civil Society Index. In: M. Salamon & S. W. Sokolowski (Eds.), Global civil society. Volume 2. Dimensions of the nonprofit sector (pp. 61–92). Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, W., & Salamon, L. (2005). Mirror, mirror on the wall? Commentary on Heinrich. Journal of Civil Society, 1(3), 235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tester, K. (1992). Civil society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uphoff, N., & Krishna, A. (2004). Civil society and public sector institutions: More than a zero-sum relationship. Public Administration & Development, 24(4), 357–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Deth, J. W. (2003). Measuring social capital: Orthodoxies and continuing controversies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(1), 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Heinrich, V.F. (2010). Civil Society Indicators and Indexes. In: Anheier, H.K., Toepler, S. (eds) International Encyclopedia of Civil Society. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-93994-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-93996-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics