Encyclopedia of Tribology

2013 Edition
| Editors: Q. Jane Wang, Yip-Wah Chung

Surface Synthesis Based on Surface Statistics

  • Feodor M. Borodich
  • Davide Bianchi
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92897-5_309



Surface synthesis is the process of mimicking a natural surface in order to create a synthetic surface whose main characteristics of topography are the same from a statistical point of view as the characteristics of the original surface.

Scientific Fundamentals

Historically, problems of tribology were studied initially for bodies of classical shapes (e.g., spheres, cones, and flat-ended punches) having ideal smooth surfaces. However, it was soon realized that deviations of contact surface from ideal shapes and the effect of surface features such as bumps, waviness, and roughness can have a great influence on the results of calculations. Currently modern experimental techniques (e.g., techniques based on atomic-force microscopy) allow researchers to describe the surface topography up to atomic scale resolution. However, even if it were possible to compute a tribological problem for a real rough surface, this would be of little use, as...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. J.F. Archard, Elastic deformation and the laws of friction. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A243, 190–205 (1957)Google Scholar
  2. N.M. Astaf'eva, Wavelet analysis: basic theory and some applications. Phys. Usp. 39, 1085–1108 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. B. Bhushan, A fractal theory of the temperature distribution at elastic contacts of fast sliding surfaces – discussion. J. Tribol. 117, 214–215 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. F.M. Borodich, Parametric homogeneity and non-classical self-similarity. II. Some applications. Acta Mech. 131, 47–67 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. F.M. Borodich, D.A. Onishchenko, Fractal roughness for problem of contact and friction (the simplest models). J. Fricti. Wear 14, 452–459 (1993)Google Scholar
  6. F.M. Borodich, D.A. Onishchenko, Similarity and fractality in the modelling of roughness by a multilevel profile with hierarchical structure. Int. J. Solids Struct. 36, 2585–2612 (1999)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. I. Daubechies, Ten Lectures on Wavelets. CBMS-NSF Lecture Notes, vol. 61 (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1992)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. P.W.J. Glover, K. Matsuki, R. Hikima, K. Hayashi, Synthetic rough fractures in rocks. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 103(No.B5), 9609–9620 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. J.A. Greenwood, Problems with surface roughness, in Fundamentals of Friction: Macroscopic and Microscopic Processes, ed. by I.L. Singer, H.M. Pollock (Kluwer, Boston, 1992), pp. 57–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. J.A. Greenwood, J.B.P. Williamson, Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A370, 300–319 (1966)Google Scholar
  11. A.A. Lubrecht, C.H. Venner, Elastohydrodynamic lubrication of rough surfaces. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Pt. J J. Eng. Tribol. 213, 397–404 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. A. Majumdar, B. Bhushan, Role of fractal geometry in roughness characterization and contact mechanics of surfaces. J. Tribol. 112, 205–216 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. G.E. Morales-Espejel, C.H. Venner, J.A. Greenwood, Kinematics of transverse real roughness in elastohydrodynamically lubricated line contacts using Fourier analysis. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Pt. J J. Eng. Tribol. 214, 523–534 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. B. Nowicki, Multiparameter representation of surface roughness. Wear 102, 161–176 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. C. Roques-Carmes, D. Wehbi, J.F. Quiniou, C. Tricot, Modelling engineering surfaces and evaluating their non-integer dimension for application in material science. Surf. Topogr. 1, 435–443 (1988)Google Scholar
  16. K.J. Stout, L. Blunt, Filtering technology for three-dimensional surface topography analysis, in Three Dimensional Surface Topography, ed. by K.J. Stout, L. Blunt (Penton Press, London, 2000), pp. 95–142Google Scholar
  17. T.L. Warren, D. Krajcinovic, Random Cantor set models for the elastic perfectly plastic contact of rough surfaces. Wear 196, 1–15 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. D.J. Whitehouse, J.F. Archard, The properties of random surfaces of significance in their contact. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 316, 97–121 (1970)Google Scholar
  19. V.A. Zhuravlev, On question of theoretical justification of the Amontons-Coulomb law for friction of unlubricated surfaces. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Pt. J J. Eng. Tribol. 221, 397–404 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
  2. 2.Austrian Center of Competence for Tribology AC2TWiener NeustadtAustria