Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2011 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Grooved Pegboard Test

  • Brad Merker
  • Kenneth Podell
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_187

Synonyms

 GPT

Description

The GPT assesses eye–hand coordination and motor speed and thus requires sensory motor integration and a high level of motor processing (Roy & Square-Storer, 1994). It is considered a more complex motor task than others such as Grip Strength or Finger Tapping. As such, it requires more effort and is more sensitive to psychomotor speed (Mitrushina, Boone, Razani, D’Elia, 2005). The test has been used extensively for identifying lateralized impairment such as that in Parkinson’s disease (Demakis et al., 2002). In addition, it has been found to be sensitive in detecting general slowing due to medication or disease progression (Tiffin, 1968), and used to evaluate cognitive and motor slowing in Bipolar disorder (Wilder-Willis, Sax, Rosenberg, Fleck, Shear, Strakowski, 2001), HIV infection (Honn, Para, Whitacre, & Bornstein, 1999), and other conditions of interest to neuropsychologists.

The test apparatus consists of a square metal surface (10.1 cm2) with a 5 × 5...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References and Reading

  1. Bornstein, R. A. (1985). Normative data on selected neuropsychological measures from a nonclinical sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 651–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bornstein, R. A. (1986). Normative data on intermanual differences on three tests of motor performance. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8, 12–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bornstein, R. A., Paniak, C., & O’Brien, W. (1987). Preliminary data on classification of normal and brain-damaged elderly subjects. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1(4), 315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, S. G., Roy, E. A., Rohr, L. E., Snider, B. R., & Bryden, P. J. (2004). Preference and performance measures of handedness. Brain and Cognition, 55(2), 283–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryden, P. J., & Roy, E. A. (2005). A new method of administering the grooved pegboard test: performance as a function of handedness and sex. Brain and Cognition, 58, 258–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dodrill, C. B. (1979). Sex differences on the Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological battery and on other neuropsychological measures. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35(2), 236–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harley, J. P., Leuthold, C. A., Matthews, C. G., & Bergs, L. E. (1980). Wisconsin neuropsychological test battery T-score norms for older veterans administration medical center patients. Madison, WI: Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin Medical School.Google Scholar
  8. Heaton, R. K., Grant, I., & Matthews, C. G. (1986). Differences in neuropsychological test performance associated with age, education, and sex. In I. Grant & K. Adams (Eds.), Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatric disorders. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Heaton, R. K., Grant, I., & Matthews, C. (1991). Comprehensive norms for an expanded halstead-reitan neuropsychological battery: Demographic corrections, research findings, and clinical applications. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  10. Honn, V. J., Para, M. F., Whitacre, C. C., & Bornstein, R. A. (1999). Effect of exercise on neuropsychological performance in asymptomatic HIV infection. AIDS and Behavior, 3(1), 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kelland, D. Z., & Lewis, R. F. (1994). Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the repeatable cognitive-perceptual-motor battery. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 8, 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klove, H. (1963). Clinical neuropsychology. In F. M. Forster (Ed.), The Medical Clinics of North America (pp. 1647–1658). New York: WB Saunders.Google Scholar
  13. Lewis, R., & Kupke, T. (1992). Intermanual differences on skilled and unskilled motor tasks in nonlateralized brain dysfunction. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 6, 374–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Matthews, C. G., & Klove, H. (1964). Instruction manual for the adult neuropsychology test battery. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Medical School.Google Scholar
  15. Mitrushina, M., Boone, K. B., Razani, J., D’Elia, L. F. (2005). Handbook of normative data for neuropsychological assessment(2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Peters, M., & Campagnaro, P. (1996). Do women really excel over men in manual dexterity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1107–1112.Google Scholar
  17. Roy, E. A., & Square-Storer, P. A. (1994). Neuropsychology of movement sequencing disorders and apraxia. In D. W. Zaidel (Ed.), Neuropsychology. St. Louis, MO: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ruff, R. M., & Parker, S. B. (1993). Gender and age specific changes in motor speed and eye-hand coordination in adults: Normative values for the finger tapping and grooved pegboard tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 1219–1230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schmidt, S. L., Olivereira, R. M., Rocha, F. B., & Abreu-Villaca, Y. (2000). Influences of handedness and gender on the grooved pegboard test. Brain and Cognition, 44, 445–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thompson, L. L., Heaton, R. K., Matthews, C. G., & Grant, I. (1987). Comparison of preferred and nonpreferered hand performance on four neuropsychological motor tasks. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1(4), 324–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tiffin, J. (1968). Purdue pegboard examiner’s manual. Rosemont, IL: London House.Google Scholar
  22. Wilder-Willis, K. E., Sax, K. W., Rosenberg, H. L., Fleck, D. E., Shear, P. K., Strakowski, S. M. (2001). Persistent attentional dysfunction in remitted bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders, 2, 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brad Merker
    • 1
  • Kenneth Podell
    • 2
  1. 1.Henry Ford Health SystemsDetroitUSA
  2. 2.Division of NeuropsychologyHenry Ford Health SystemsDetroitUSA