Encyclopedia of Language and Education

2008 Edition
| Editors: Nancy H. Hornberger

BICS and CALP: Empirical and Theoretical Status of the Distinction

  • Jim Cummins
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_36

Introduction

The distinction between basic interpersonal communicative skills (BICS) and cognitive academic language proficiency (CALP) was introduced by Cummins ( 1979, 1981a) in order to draw educators' attention to the timelines and challenges that second language learners encounter as they attempt to catch up to their peers in academic aspects of the school language. BICS refers to conversational fluency in a language while CALP refers to students' ability to understand and express, in both oral and written modes, concepts and ideas that are relevant to success in school. The terms conversational fluency and academic language proficiency are used interchangeably with BICS and CALP in the remainder of this chapter.

Initially, I describe the origins, rationale, and evolution of the distinction together with its empirical foundations. I then discuss its relationship to similar theoretical constructs that have been proposed in different contexts and for different purposes. Finally, I...

Keywords

Language Proficiency Vocabulary Knowledge Immigrant Student Academic Language Bilingual Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Barton, D.: 1994, Literacy: An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Biber, D.: 1986, ‘Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings’, Language 62, 384–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broome, Y.: 2004, ‘Reading English in multilingual South African primary schools’, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 7, 506–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruner, J.S.: 1975, ‘Language as an instrument of thought’, in A. Davies (ed.), Problems of Language and Learning, Heinemann, London, 61–88.Google Scholar
  5. Cline, T. and Frederickson, N. (eds.): 1996, Curriculum Related Assessment, Cummins and Bilingual Children, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, England.Google Scholar
  6. Coelho, E.: 2004, Adding English: A Guide to Teaching in Multilingual Classrooms, Pippin Publishing, Toronto.Google Scholar
  7. Corson, D.: 1997, ‘The learning and use of academic English words’, Language Learning 47, 671–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coxhead, A.: 2000, ‘A new academic word list’, TESOL Quarterly 34(2), 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cummins, J.: 1979, ‘Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters’, Working Papers on Bilingualism 19, 121–129.Google Scholar
  10. Cummins, J.: 1980, ‘Psychological assessment of immigrant children: Logic or intuition ?’, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 1, 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cummins, J.: 1981a, ‘The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students’, in California State Department of Education (ed.), Schooling and Language Minority Students: A Theoretical Framework, Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center California State University, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  12. Cummins, J.: 1981b, ‘Age on arrival and immigrant second language learning in Canada: A reassessment’, Applied Linguistics 1, 132–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cummins, J.: 1984, Bilingualism and Special Education: Issues in Assessment and Pedagogy, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, England.Google Scholar
  14. Cummins, J.: 2000, Language, Power and Pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the Crossfire, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, England.Google Scholar
  15. Cummins, J.: 2001, Negotiating Identities: Education for Empowerment in a Diverse Society (second edition), California Association for Bilingual Education, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  16. Cummins, J., Brown, K., and Sayers, D.: 2007, Literacy, Technology, and Diversity: Teaching for Success in Changing Times, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar
  17. Cummins, J. and Swain, M.: 1983, ‘Analysis‐by‐rhetoric: Reading the text or the reader's own projections?’, A reply to Edelsky et al. Applied Linguistics 4, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diaz‐Rico, L.T. and Weed, K.Z.: 2002, The Crosscultural, Language, and Academic Development Handbook: A Complete K‐12 Reference Guide (second edition), Allyn & Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar
  19. Donaldson, M.: 1978, Children's Minds, Collins, Glasgow.Google Scholar
  20. Edelsky, C.: 1990, ‘With literacy and justice for all: Rethinking the social in language and education’, The Falmer Press, London.Google Scholar
  21. Edelsky, C., Hudelson, S., Flores, B., Barkin, F., Altweger, B., and Jilbert, K.: 1983, ‘Semilingualism and language deficit’, Applied Linguistics 4, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gee, J.P.: 1990, Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideologies in Discourses, Falmer Press, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Guthrie, J.T.: 2004, ‘Teaching for literacy engagement’, Journal of Literacy Research 36, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hakuta, K., Butler, Y.G., and Witt, D.: 2000, How Long Does It Take English Learners to Attain Proficiency?, University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  25. Klesmer, H.: 1994, ‘Assessment and teacher perceptions of ESL student achievement’, English Quarterly 26(3), 8–11.Google Scholar
  26. MacSwan, J.: 2000, ‘The threshold hypothesis, semilingualism, and other contributions to a deficit view of linguistic minorities’, Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 22(1), 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin‐Jones, M. and Romaine, S.: 1986, ‘Semilingualism: A half‐baked theory of communicative competence’, Applied Linguistics 7, 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oller, J.: 1979, Language Tests at School: A Pragmatic Approach, Longman, London.Google Scholar
  29. Olson, D.R.: 1977, From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review 47, 257–281.Google Scholar
  30. Scarcella, R.: 2003, Academic English: A conceptual framework, The University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute Technical Report, Santa Barbara, 2003‐1.Google Scholar
  31. Skutnabb‐Kangas, T. and Toukomaa, P.: 1976, Teaching Migrant Children's Mother Tongue and Learning the Language of the Host Country in the Context of the Socio‐Cultural Situation of the Migrant Family, The Finnish National Commission for UNESCO, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  32. Shohamy, E., Levine, T., Spolsky, B., Kere‐Levy, M., Inbar, O., and Shemesh, M.: 2002, The academic achievements of immigrant children from the former USSR and Ethiopia. Report (in Hebrew) submitted to the Ministry of Education, Israel.Google Scholar
  33. Snow, C.E. and Hoefnagel‐Hohle, M.: 1978, ‘The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning’, Child Development 49, 1114–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Street, B.: 1995, Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy in Development, Ethnography and Education, Longman, London.Google Scholar
  35. Thomas, W.P. and Collier, V.P.: 2002, A National Study of School Effectiveness for Language Minority Students’ Long‐Term Academic Achievement, Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence, University of California‐Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, http//www.crede.ucsc.edu.
  36. Valdés, G.: 2004, ‘Between support and marginalization: The development of academic language in linguistic minority children’, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 7, 102–132.Google Scholar
  37. Vincent, C.: 1996, Singing to a Star: The School Meanings of Second Generation Salvadorean Students, Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.Google Scholar
  38. Wiley, T.G.: 1996, Literacy and Language Diversity in the United States, Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jim Cummins
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of TorontoTorontoCanada