Adolescent Sexual Offending

  • Barry R. Burkhart
  • Patrick K. Cook
Reference work entry


Adolescents who sexually offend present difficult and complicated demands for clinicians. The gravity of sex offending cannot be ignored, however, because adolescent offending does not necessarily presage adult offending, intervention must not preclude normal developmental opportunities. However, most adult persistent offenders begin offending during adolescence. Thus, clinicians have to provide effective treatment for the potentially serious adult offender while preventing negative second order effects that might create iatrogenic developmental consequences. The essential conclusions about the etiology of juvenile sex offending are that the processes are multi-factorial, complex and developmentally organized. Based on this analysis, assessment of the individual adolescent is critical to establishing an articulated treatment plan and five domains are identified as critical areas for the clinical picture. These are: (1) offender’s victimization and abuse history; (2) social skills deficits, social isolation, and attachment difficulties; (3) deviant sex arousal and/or sexual preoccupation; (4) aggression and general delinquency; and (5) an exaggeration of “normal” adolescent sexual curiosity or exploration in a context of opportunism and weak supervision. Given the complexity of developmental pathways, no single model for intervention provides a sufficiently comprehensive approach for the treatment for juvenile sex offenders. Instead, treatment should be organized by a risk-need-responsivity paradigm that provides a useful algorithm for clinical treatment formulation. Additionally, the intervention must eventuate in the development of a non-stigmatized identity for the developing adolescent. Based on the notion that a risk-need-responsivity analysis should inform treatment, clinicians need to have a strong grasp of developmentally sensitive assessment, competency in navigating the social and legal contexts in which adolescent offenders are found, and be able to serve as a social and legal advocate based on a solid understanding of the empirical findings about adolescents who have sexually offended.


  1. Abel, G. C., Becker, J. V., Mittelman, M., Cunning-ham-Rathner, J., Rouleau, J. L., & Murphy, W. D. (1987). Self-reported sex crimes of nonincarcerated para-philiacs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abel, G. C., Mittleman, M. S., & Becker, J. V. (1985). Sexual offenders: Results of assessment and recommendations for treatment. In Ben-Aron, M. R., Huckle, S. J., & Webster, C. D. (Eds.), Clinical criminology: The assessment and treatment of criminal behavior (pp. 191–205). Toronto: M & M Graphic.Google Scholar
  3. Abel, G. G., & Rouleau, J. L. (1990). The nature and extent of sexual assault. In Marsahll, W. L., Laws, D.R., & Barbaree, H. E. (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories and treatment of the offender (pp. 9–21). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  4. Alford, G. S., Morin, C., Atkins, M., & Schoen, L. (1987). Masturbatory extinction of deviant sexual arousal: A case study. Behavior Therapy, 18, 265–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. (2000). Summary of the practice parameters for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents who are sexually abusive to others. Journal of the American Academy of Children and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 127–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2003). Psychology of criminal conduct (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.Google Scholar
  7. Awad, O. A., & Saunders, E. B. (1991). Male adolescent sexual assaulters: Clinical observations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 446–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bancroft, J. (2006). Normal sexual development. In Barbaree, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (2nd ed., pp. 19–57). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  9. Barbaree, Marshall, W. L. & H. E., (Eds.). (2006). The juvenile sex offender (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  10. Becker, J. V. (1988). The effects of child sexual abuse on adolescent sexual offenders. In Wyatt, G. E., & Powell, G. J. (Eds.), Lasting effects of child sexual abuse (pp. 193–207). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Becker, J. V. (1998). What we know about the characteristics and treatment of adolescents who have committed sexual offenses. Child Maltreatment, 3, 317–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Becker, J. V., & Kaplan, M. S. (1988). The assessment of adolescent sexual offenders. Advances in Behavioral Assessment of Children and Families, 4, 97–118.Google Scholar
  13. Bonta, J., Wallace-Capretta, S., & Rooney, J. (2000). A quasi-experimental evaluation of an intensive rehabilitation supervision program. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 312–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Borduin, C. M., Henggeler, S.W., Blaske, D. M., & Stein, R. (1990). Multisystemic treatment of adolescent sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 35, 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Borduin, C. M., Schaeffer, C. M., & Heiblum, N. (2009). A randomized clinical trial of multisystemic therapy with juvenile sexual offenders: Effects on youth social ecology and criminal activity. Journal of Consul-ting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burkhart, B. R., Cook, P. K., & Sumrall, R. (2008, October). Embedding research in a large scale treatment program. Paper presented at Association for the Treat-ment of Sexual Abusers, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  17. Burkhart, B. R., Peaton, A., & Sumrall, R. (2009). Creating new partnerships: Alabama youth services teams with universities for sex offender treatment program. Corrections Today, in press.Google Scholar
  18. Burton, D. L., Miller, D. L., & Shill, C. T. (2002). A social learning theory comparison of the sexual victimization of adolescent sexual offenders and non-sexual offending male delinquents. Child Abuse and Neglect, 26, 893–907.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Calder, M. C. (2001). Juveniles and children who sexually abuse: Frameworks for assessment (2nd ed.). Dorset, UK: Russell House Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Caldwell, M. F., Ziemke, M. H., & Vitacco, M. J. (2008). An examination of the sex offender registration and notification act as applied to juveniles: Evaluating the ability to predict sexual recidivism. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14, 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Calley, N. G. (2009). Comprehensive program development in mental health counseling: Design, implementation, and evaluation. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 31, 9–21.Google Scholar
  22. Cooper, C. L., Murphy, W. D., & Haynes, M. R. (1996). Characteristics of abused and nonabused adolescent sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 105–119.Google Scholar
  23. Daleiden, E., Kaufman, K. L., Hilliker, D. R., & O’Neil, J. N. (1998). The sexual histories and fantasies of youthful males: A comparison of sexual offending, nonsexual offending, and nonoffending groups. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 195–209.Google Scholar
  24. Davis, G. E., & Leitenberg, H. (1987). Adolescent sex offenders. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 417–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. DiGiorgio-Miller, J. (2007). Emotional variables and deviant sexual fantasies in adolescent sex offenders. The Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 35, 109–124.Google Scholar
  26. Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755–764.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Morse, B. J. (1985). The dynamics of delinquent behavior: A national survey progress report. Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavior Sciences, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  28. Fanniff, A. M., & Becker, J. V. (2006). Specialized assessment and treatment of adolescent sex offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fehrenbach, P. A., Smith, W., Monastersky, C., & Deisher, R. W. (1986). Adolescent sexual offenders: Offender and offense characteristics. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 56, 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ford, M. E., & Linney, J. A. (1995). Comparative analysis of juvenile sexual offenders, violent nonsexual offenders, and status offenders. Journal of Inter-personal Violence, 10, 56–70.Google Scholar
  31. Gray, A. S., & Pithers, W. D. (1993). Relapse prevention with sexually aggressive adolescents and children: Expanding treatment and supervision. In Barbaree, H. E., Marshall, W. L., & Hudson, S. M. (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (pp. 289–319). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  32. Hagan, M. P., Anderson, D. L., Caldwell, M. S., & Kemper, T. S. (2008). Five-year accuracy of assessments of high risk for sexual recidivism of adolescents. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Cri-minology, 1–10. doi: 10.1177/0306624X08325348Google Scholar
  33. Hanson, R. K., Gibson, A., Harris, A., Marques, J., Murphy, W., Quinsey, V., et al. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169–194.Google Scholar
  34. Hunter, J. A., & Becker, J. V. (1994). The role of deviant sexual arousal in juvenile sexual offending: Etiology, evaluation, and treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 132–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hunter, J. A., Becker, J. V., & Lexier, L. J. (2006). The female sex offender. In Barbaree, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (2nd ed., pp. 148–165). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  36. Hunter, J. A., & Figueredo, A. J. (2000). The influence of personality and history of sexual victimization in the prediction of juvenile perpetrated child molestation. Behavior Modification, 24, 241–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jonson-Reid, M. (1998). Youth violence and exposure to violence in childhood: An ecological review. Aggres-sion and Behavior, 3, 159–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kahn, T. J., & Chambers, H. J. (1991). Assessing reoffense risk with juvenile sexual offenders. Child Welfare, 70, 333–345.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kahn, T. J., & Lafond, M. A. (1988). Treatment of the adolescent sexual offender. Child and Adolescent Social Work, 5, 135–148.Google Scholar
  40. Kenny, D. T., Keogh, T., & Seidler, K. (2001). Predictors of recidivism in Australian juvenile sex offenders: Implications for treatment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 131–148.Google Scholar
  41. Koss, M. P., Bachar, K., & Hopkins, C. Q. (2006). Dis-position and treatment of juvenile sex offenders from the perspective of restorative justice. In Barbaree, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (2nd ed., pp. 336–382). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  42. Langton, C. M., & Barbaree, H. E. (2006). Conceptual issues in treatment evaluation research with juvenile sexual offenders. In Barbaree, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (2nd ed., pp. 248–274). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  43. Leitenberg, H., & Henning, K. (1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 3, 469–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Letourneau, E. (2006). Legal consequences of juvenile sex offending in the United States. In Barbaree, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (2nd ed., pp. 275–290). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  45. Letourneau, E. J., & Armstrong, K. S. (2008). Recidivism rates for registered and nonregistered juvenile sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 393–408.Google Scholar
  46. Marques, J. K., Wiederanders, M., Day, D. M., Nelson, C., & van Ommeren, A. (2005). Effects of a relapse prevention program on sexual recidivism: Final results from California’s Sex Offender Treatment and Evaluation Project (SOTEOP). Sexual Abuse: A Jour-nal of Research and Treatment, 17, 79–107.Google Scholar
  47. Marshall, W. L. (1996). The sexual offender: Monster, victim, or everyman? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 317–335.Google Scholar
  48. Marshall, W. L., Barbaree, H. E., & Eccles, A. (1991). Early onset and deviant sexuality in child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McGrath, R. J., Cumming, G. F., & Burchard, B. L. (2003). Current practices and trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2002 nationwide survey. Brandon, VT: Safer Society.Google Scholar
  50. Miner, M. H. (2000). Competency-based assessment. In Laws, D. R., Hudson, S. M., & Ward, T. (Eds.), Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders: A sourcebook (pp. 213–224). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Miner, M. H. (2002). Factors associated with recidivism in juveniles: An analysis of serious juvenile sex offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39, 421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miner, M. H., & Crimmins, C. S. (1995). Adolescent sex offenders: Issues of etiology and risk factors. In Schwartz, B. K., & Celini, H. K. (Eds.), The sex offender: Volume I: Corrections, treatment and legal practice. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.Google Scholar
  53. Pastore, A. L., & Maguire, K. (Eds.). (2007). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics: 31st Edition. Retrieved March 26, 2009, from
  54. Pithers, W. D. (1990). Relapse prevention with sexual aggressors: A method for maintaining therapeutic gain and enhancing external supervision. In Marshall, W. L., Laws, D. R., & Barbaree, H. E. (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 343–361). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  55. Pithers, W. D., & Gray, A. (1998). The science of sex offenders: Risk assessment, treatment, and prevention: The other half of the story: Children with sexual behavior problems. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pithers, W. D., Kashima, K. M., Cumming, G. F., Beal, L. S., & Buell, M. M. (1988). Relapse prevention of sexual aggression. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 528, 244–260.Google Scholar
  57. Pithers, W. D., Marques, J. K., Gibat, C.C., & Marlatt, G. A. (1983). Relapse prevention with sexual agg-ressor: A self-control model of treatment and maintenance of change. In Greer, J. G., & Stuart, I. R. (Eds.), The sexual aggressor: Current perspectives on treatment (pp. 214–234). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  58. Rasmussen, L. A. (1999). Factors related to recidivism among juvenile sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 69–86.Google Scholar
  59. Reitzel, L. R., & Carbonell, J. L. (2006). The effectiveness of sex offender treatment for juveniles as measured by recidivism: A meta–analysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 401–421.Google Scholar
  60. Rich, P. (2003). Understanding, assessing, and rehabilitating juvenile sexual offenders. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  61. Rich, P. (2009). Juvenile sex offenders: A comprehensive guide to risk evaluations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  62. Reynolds, M. A., Herbenick, D. L., & Bancroft, J. (2003). The nature of childhood sexual experiences: Two studies 50 years apart. In Bancroft, J. (Ed.), Sexual development in childhood (pp. 134–155). Bloom-ington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Ronis, S. T., & Borduin, C. M. (2007). Individual, family, peer, and academic characteristics of male juvenile sexual offenders. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 153–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rowe-Lonczynski, C. M. (1992). Adolescent sexual offen-ders: Social isolation, social competency skills and identified problem behaviours. Unpublished docto-ral dissertation, University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  65. Rubinstein, M., Yeager, C. A., Goodstein, C., & Lewis, D. O. (1993). Sexually assaultive male juveniles: A follow-up. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 262–265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Ryan, G., Miyoshi, T. J., Metzner, J. L., Krugman, R. D., & Fryer, G. E. (1996). Trends in a national sample of sexually abusive youths. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 17–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schram, D. D., Milloy, C. D., & Rowe, W. E. (1991). Juvenile sex offenders: A follow-up study of reoffense behavior. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
  68. Smallbone, S. W. (2006). Social and psychological factors in the development and delinquency of sexual deviance. In Barbaree, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (2nd ed., pp. 105–127). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  69. Smith, W. R., & Monastersky, C. (1986). Assessing juvenile sexual offenders’ risk for reoffending. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13, 115–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thakker, J., Ward, T., & Tidmarsh, P. (2006). A ree-valuation of relapse prevention with adolescents who sexually offend: A good lives model. In Barba-ree, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (2nd ed., pp. 313–335). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  71. Trivits, L. C., & Reppucci, N. D. (2002). Application of Megan’s law to juveniles. American Psychologist, 57, 690–704.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. van Wijk, A., van Horn, J., Bullens, R., Bijleveld, C., & Doreleijers, T. (2005). Juvenile sex offenders: A group on its own? International Journal of Offender Ther-apy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vandiver, D. M. (2006). A prospective analysis of juvenile male sex offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 673–688.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Veneziano, C., & Veneziano, L. (2002). Adolescent sex offenders: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 3, 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Walker, D. F., McGovern, S. K., Poey, E. L., & Otis, K. E. (2004). Treatment effectiveness for male adolescent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis and review. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 13, 281–294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ward, T. (2002). Good lives and the rehabilitation of offenders: Promises and problems. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 513–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ward, T., & Mann, R. (2004). Good lives and the rehabilitation of sex offenders: A positive approach to treatment. In Linley, A., & Stephen, J. (Eds.), Positive practice in psychology (pp. 598–617). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  78. Ward, T., Polaschek, D. L. L., & Beech, A. (2006). Theories of sexual offending. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  79. Widom, C. S. (1995). Victims of childhood sexual abuse–late criminal consequences. Research in Brief: National Institute of Justice, 3, 1–8.Google Scholar
  80. Worling, J. R. (1995). Sexual abuse histories of adolescent male sex offenders: Differences on the basis of the age and gender of their victims. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 610–613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Worling, J. R. (2004). Essentials of a good intervention program for sexually abusive juveniles: Offense related treatment tasks. In O’Reilly, G., Marshall, W. L., Carr, A., & Beckett, R. C. (Eds.), The handbook of clinical intervention with young people who sexually abuse (pp. 275–296). New York: Brunner–Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Worling, J. R., & Curwin, C. (2000). Adolescent sexual offender recidivism: Success of specialized treatment and implications for risk predictions. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 965–982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zimring, F. E. (2004). An American travesty: Legal res-ponses to adolescent sexual offending. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barry R. Burkhart
    • 1
  • Patrick K. Cook
    • 1
  1. 1.Auburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations