Environment and environmentalism

  • Timothy O'Riordan
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4494-1_109

Einstein is reported to have defined environment as ‘everything that isn't me’. This aphorism symbolizes one feature of the environmental dilemma. Unlike any other living creature, humans can view the natural world as if they were separate from it. Toynbee (1976) remarked that humans have rational minds and emotional souls. They can order ideas and rank feelings. They can care passionately about salvation and fear for what they bequeath to their offspring. They can over-slaughter bison yet create a lasting international Antarctic sanctuary for whales.

‘Environment’ is a metaphor for the enduring contradictions in the human condition: the power of domination yet the obligation of responsibility; the drive for betterment tempered by the sensitivity of humility; the manipulation of nature to improve the chances of survival yet the universal appeal of sustainable development; the individualism of consumerism and the social solidarity of global citizenship. These points are made in books by

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Atkinson, A., 1991. The Principles of Political Ecology. London: Belhaven, 251 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Brundtland, H. G. (Chair), 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 383 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Dickens, P., 1992. Society and Nature: Towards a Green Social Theory. Philadelphia, Penn.: Temple University Press, 203 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Dobson, A., 1990. Green Political Thought. London: Unwin-Hyman, 224 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Eckersley, R., 1992. Environmentalism and Political Theory: Towards an Ecocentric Approach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 274 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Glacken, C., 1967. Traces on the Rhodian Shore. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 763 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Hays, S. P., 1959. Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 297 pp.Google Scholar
  8. International Union for the Conservation of Nature, 1989. Caring for the Earth. London: Mitchell Beazley.Google Scholar
  9. Lovelock, J., 1992. Gaia: The Practical Science of Planetary Medicine. London: Gaia Books, 192 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Mies, M., and Shiva, V., 1993. Ecofeminism. London: Fernwood, and Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Zed Books, 328 pp.Google Scholar
  11. O'Riordan, T., 1981. Environmentalism (2nd edn). London: Pion, 409 pp.Google Scholar
  12. O'Riordan, T. (ed.), 1994. Environmental Science for Environmental Management. Harlow: Longman, 367 pp.Google Scholar
  13. O'Riordan, T., and Cameron, J. (eds), 1994. Interpreting the Precautionary Principle. London: Earthscan, 315 pp.Google Scholar
  14. O'Riordan, T., and Sewell, W. R.D. (eds), 1981. From Project Appraisal to Policy Review. Chichester: Wiley, 278 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Pearce, D. W., Turner, R. K., and Bateman, I., 1993. An Introduction to Environmental Economics. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 251 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Pepper, D., 1986. The Roots of Modern Environmentalism. London: Routledge, 246 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Sachs, W. (ed.), 1993. The Politics of Global Ecology. London: Zed Books, 246 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Simon, J. L., and Kahn, H., 1984. The Resourceful Earth: A Response to Global 2000. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Simmons, I., 1989. Changing the Face of the Earth. Oxford: Blackwell, 487 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Simmons, I., 1993. Interpreting Nature: Cultural Construction of the Environment. London: Routledge, 215 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Toynbee, A., 1976. Mankind and Mother Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 641 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy O'Riordan

There are no affiliations available