Encyclopedia of Coastal Science

2005 Edition
| Editors: Maurice L. Schwartz

Photogrammetry

  • E. Robert Thieler
  • Cheryl J. Hapke
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3880-1_244

Photogrammetry can be defined simply as the science of making reliable measurements from photographs. Unlike a map, however, a photograph contains a number of distortions that require correction before accurate measurements can be made. A number of photogrammetric techniques can be employed to remove these distortions and obtain useful measurements. In coastal studies, photogrammetric techniques are commonly employed to establish the positions of historical and modern featuresof- interest (e.g., shorelines (defined as the high-water line or wet-dry boundary), cliff edges, dune positions, etc.). Historically, the focus of study has been overwhelmingly on the use of vertical aerial photography to derive accurate shoreline positions, although photogrammetric applications using ground-based photography, videography and integration with other types of remotely sensed data (e.g., lidar) are becoming widespread. Most often, a time series of feature positions is compiled for the purpose of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Ackerman, F., 1996. Techniques and strategies for DEM generation. In Greve, C. (ed.), Digital Photogrammetry: An Addendum to the Manual of Photogrammetry. Bethesda: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, pp. 135–141.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Society of Photogrammetry, 1980. Manual of Photogrammetry, 4th edn. Falls Church: American Society of Photogrammetry.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anders, F.J., and Byrnes, M.R., 1991. Accuracy of shoreline change rates as determined from maps and aerial photographs. Shore and Beach, 59(1): 17–26.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown, D.G., and Arbogast, A.F., 1999. Digital photogrammetric change analysis as applied to active coastal dunes in Michigan. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 65: 467–474.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clow, J.B., and Leatherman, S.P., 1984. Metric mapping: an automated technique of shoreline mapping. In Falls Chorch, Virginia Proceedings, 44th American Congress on Surveying and Mapping. American Society of Photogrammetry, pp. 309–318.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crowell, M., Leatherman, S.P., and Buckley, M.K., 1991. Historical shoreline change: error analysis and mapping accuracy. Journal of Coastal Research, 7: 839–852.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dolan, R., Hayden, B., and Heywood, J., 1978. A new photogrammetric method for determining shoreline erosion. Coastal Engineering, 2: 21–39.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dolan, R., Hayden, B.P., May, P., and May, S., 1980. The reliability of shoreline change measurements from aerial photographs. Shore and Beach, 48(4): 22–29.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Falkner, E., 1995. Aerial Mapping Methods and Applications. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hapke, C., and Richmond, B., 2000. Monitoring beach morphology changes using small-format aerial photography and digital softcopy photogrammetry. Environmental Geosciences, 7: 32–37.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hapke, C., Willis, C., and D’Iorio, M., 2000. Going digital: error evaluation of media and scanner types for aerial photographic analyses in coastal change studies. In Proceedings of the American Shore and Beach Preservation Association Annual Meeting, Aug. 6 2–10, Kaanapali, Maui.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leatherman, S.P., 1983. Shoreline mapping: A comparison of techniques. Shore and Beach, 51: 28–33.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lucas, J.R., and Lapine, L.A., 1996. Airborne GPS. In Greve, C. (ed.), Digital Photogrammetry: An Addendum to the Manual of Photogrammetry. Bethesda: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, pp. 39–41.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moore, L.J., 2000. Shoreline mapping techniques. Journal of Coastal Research, 16: 111–124.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith, G.L., and Zarillo, G.A., 1990. Calculating long-term shoreline recession rates using aerial photographic and beach profiling techniques. Journal of Coastal Research, 6(1): 111–120.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stafford, D.B., and Langfelder, J., 1971. Air photo survey of coastal erosion. Photogrammetric Engineering, 37: 565–575.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thieler, E.R., and Danforth, W.W., 1994a. Historical shoreline mapping (I): improving techniques and reducing positioning errors. Journal of Coastal Research, 10: 549–563.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thieler, E.R., and Danforth, W.W., 1994b. Historical shoreline mapping (II): application of the Digital Shoreline Mapping and Analysis Systems (DSMS/DSAS) to shoreline change mapping in Puerto Rico. Journal of Coastal Research, 10: 600–620.Google Scholar

Cross-references

  1. 1.
    Beach FeaturesGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coastal BoundariesGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Geographic Information SystemsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Global Positioning SystemsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mapping Shores and Coastal TerrainGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nearshore Geomorphological MappingGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Profiling, BeachGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Remote Sensing of Coastal EnvironmentsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Robert Thieler
  • Cheryl J. Hapke

There are no affiliations available