Abstract
This chapter addresses ethical issues in cultural research on human development. We argue for the importance of attending to culture in all phases of the research process and highlight ways that promoting the ethical sensitivity of cultural research enhances its validity and explanatory force. The first portion of the chapter focuses on early phases of the research process. We underscore the need to operationalize constructs in culturally valid ways and identify challenges that arise when objectively comparable procedures involve culturally variable meanings. The next section focuses on ethical issues in sampling, including the importance of tapping understudied populations and respecting local cultural norms in securing informed consent. We next address ethical aspects of study design and data collection, pointing out ways that harm, coercion and invasion of privacy that may result from inadequate attention to cultural meanings and practices. Lastly, we discuss the impact of drawing unsound or stereotypical conclusions about culture and human development, while discussing the insights cross-cultural research has to offer in terms of broadening psychological constructs, contributing to basic psychological theory, and making the discipline less culturally parochial. We conclude by outlining ways in which culturally sensitive research can enhance both ethics and research quality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abramovitch R, Freedman JL, Henry K, Van Brunschot M. Children’s capacityto agree to psychological research: knowledge of risks and benefits and voluntariness. Ethics Behav. 1995;5:25–48.
Ainsworth MD. The development of infant-mother interaction among the Ganda. In: Foss BM, editor. The determinants of infant behaviour II. London: Methuen; 1963. p. 67–112.
Allen A. Coercing privacy. In: Goldman J, Choy A, editors. Privacy and confidentiality in health research, vol. 2. Bethesda: National Bioethics Advisory Commission; 1999. p. C1–C34.
Arnett JJ. The neglected 95%: why American psychology needs to become less American. Am Psychol. 2008;63:602–14.
Barber BK, Olsen JE, Shagle SC. Associations between parental psychological and behavioral control and youth internalized and externalized behaviors. Child Dev. 1994;65:1120–36.
Barr RG. Infant crying behavior and colic: an interpretation in evolutionary perspective. In: Trevarthen WR, Smith EO, McKenna JJ, editors. Evolutionay medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999. p. 27–51.
Baumrind D. Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child Dev. 1966;37:887–907.
Baumrind D. The discipline controversy revisited. Fam Relat J Appl Fam Child Stud. 1996;45(4): 1405–14.
Baumrind D, Larzelere RE, Owens E. Effects of preschool parents’ power assertive patterns and practices on adolescent development. Parent Sci Pract. 2010;10:156–201.
Beauvais F, Trimble JE. The role of the researcher in evaluating American Indian alcohol and other drug abuse prevention programs. In: Orlandi MA, editor. Cultural competence for evaluators: a guide for alcohol and other drug abuse prevention practitioners working with ethnic/racial communities. Rockville: US Department of Health & Human Services; 1992. p. 173–201.
Brooks-Gunn J, Rotheram-Borus MJ. Rights to privacy in research: adolescents versus parents. Ethics Behav. 1994;42:109–21.
Carey S. Are children fundamentally different thinkers and learners from adults? In: Chipman SF, Segal JW, Glaser R, editors. Thinking and learning skills, vol. 2. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1985. p. 485–517. Reprinted by Open University Press: Open University Readings in Cognitive Development.
Casas JM, Thompson CE. Ethical principles and standards: a racial-ethnic minority research perspective. Couns Values. 1991;35:186–95.
Chao RK. Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Dev. 1994;65:1111–9.
Chao RK. Chinese and European American cultural models of the self reflected in mothers-childrearing beliefs. Ethos. 1995;23:328–54.
Chao RK. Extending research on the consequences of parenting style for Chinese Americans and European Americans. Child Dev. 2001;72:1832–43.
Conger RD, Conger RD, Elder GH, Lorenz FO, Simons RL, Whitbeck LB. A family process model of economic hardship and adjustment of early adolescent boys. Child Dev. 1992;63:526–41.
Coplan RJ, Hastings DP, Lagace-Seguin DG, Moulton CE. Authoritative and authoritarian mothers’ parenting goals, attributions, and emotions across different childrearing contexts. Parent Sci Pract. 2002;2:1–26.
Darling N, Steinberg L. Parenting style as a context: an integrative model. Psychol Bull. 1993;113:487–96.
Dornbusch SM, Ritter PL, Leiderman PH, Roberts DF, Fraleigh MH. The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. Child Dev. 1987;58:1244–57.
Fernald A. Getting beyond the “convenience sample” in research on early cognitive development. Behav Brain Sci. 2010;33:91–2.
Fisher CB. Participant consultation: ethical insights into parental permission and confidentiality procedures for policy relevant research with youth. In: Lerner RM, Jacobs F, Wertlieb D, editors. Handook of applied developmental science, vol. 4. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2002. p. 371–96.
Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world? Behav Brain Sci. 2010;33:61–83.
Hofstede G. Motivation, leadership and organization: do American theories apply abroad. Organ Dyn. 1980;9:42–63.
Hofstede G. Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pac J Manag. 1984;1:81–99.
Jackon-Newsom J, Buchanan CM, McDonald RM. Parenting and perceived maternal warmth in European American and African American Adolescents. J Marriage Fam. 2008;70:62–75.
Markus HR, Kityama S. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev. 1991;98:224–53.
Mason CA, Walker-Barnes CJ, Tu S, Simons J, Martinez-Arrue R. Ethnic differences in the affective meaning of parental control behaviors. J Prim Prev. 2004;25:59–79.
Meléndez L. Parental beliefs and practices around early self-regulation: the impact of culture and immigration. Infants Young Child. 2005;18:136–46.
Miller VA, Feudtner C. Parent and child perceptions of the benefits of research participation. IRB Ethics Hum Res. 2016;38(4):1–7.
Monshi B, Zieglmayer V. The problem of privacy in transcultural research: reflections on an ethnographic study in Sri Lanka. Ethics Behav. 2004;14:305–12.
Nisbett RE. The geography of thought: how Asians and westerners think differently – and why. New York: Free Press; 2003.
Norton IM, Manson SM. Research in American Indian and Alaska Native communities: navigating the cultural universe of values and process. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64:856–60.
Papousek M. Persistent crying, parenting, and infant mental health. In: Osofsky JD, Fitzgerald HE, editors. WAIMH handbook of infant mental health, vol. 4. New York: Guilford Press; 2000. p. 326–38.
Parra-Cardona JR, López-Zerón G, Villa M, Zamudio E, Escobar-Chew AR, Rodríguez MM. Enhancing parenting practices with Latino/a immigrants: integrating evidence-based knowledge and culture according to the voices of Latino/a parents. Clin Soc Work J. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-016-0589-y.
Rajaramn D, Jesuraj N, Geiter L, Bennett S, Grewal H, Vaz M. How participatory is parental consent in low literacy rural settings in low income countries? Lessons learned from a community based study of infants in South India. BMC Med Ethics. 2011;12:3.
Ross N, Medin DL, Coley JD, Atran S. Cultural and experiential differences in the development of folkbiological induction. Cogn Dev. 2003;18:25–47.
Rothrauff TC, Cooney TM, An JS. Remembered parenting styles and adjustment in middle and late adulthood. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009;64B(1):137–46.
Schaefer E. Children’s reports of parental behavior: an inventory. Child Dev. 1965;36:413–21.
Small MF. Our babies, ourselves: how babies and culture shape the way we parent. New York: Anchor Books; 1998.
Stevenson HC, DeMoya D, Boruch RF. Ethical issues and approaches in AIDS research. In: Ostrow DG, Kessler RC, editors. Methodological issues in AIDS behavioral research. New York: Plenum Press; 1993. p. 19–51.
Tai MC, Lin CS. Developing a culturally relevant bioethics for Asian people. J Med Ethics. 2001;27:51–4.
Takahashi K. Attachment behaviors to a female stranger among Japanese two-year-olds. J Genet Psychol. 1982;140:299–307.
Takahashi K. Examining the strange-situation procedure with Japanese mothers and 12 month old infants. Dev Psychol. 1986;22:265–70.
Takahashi K, Hatano G. Toward a valid application of the adult attachment interview to the Japanese culture and language: the need for ethnographic adaptations. Sacred Heart Univ J. 2009;112:42–63.
Tronick EZ, Cohn JF. Infant-mother face-to-face interaction: age and gender differences in coordination and the occurrence of miscoordination. Child Dev. 1989;60:85–92.
Tronick EZ, Als H, Adamson L, Wise S, Brazelton TB. The infant’s response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry. 1978;17:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-7138(09)62273-1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Goyal, N., Wice, M., Miller, J.G. (2019). Ethical Issues in Cultural Research on Human Development. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_51
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_51
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5250-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5251-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences