Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences pp 2145–2162Cite as

Emotion and Sensitive Research

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

Qualitative research on sensitive topics is often an emotional journey, not only for the participants but for others that may be involved along the way. It is now more than 20 years since Raymond Lee authored the seminal works Doing Research on Sensitive Topics, Researching Sensitive Topics, and Dangerous Fieldwork that raised the awareness of the challenges that researchers can face. More recently, Lee and Lee (2012) warned that the emotional challenges that researchers face when doing fieldwork are now difficult to ignore. Given this warning and the growing numbers of reports from researchers, both empirically and in reflective accounts, an examination of the issues is timely for both novice and experienced researchers. Drawing on earlier empirical work with researchers in Australia (Dickson-Swift 2005) and published accounts, this chapter provides an overview of the emotional challenges inherent in this type of research. Suggestions for researchers, research supervisors, and others involved in the research team are presented. These can be adopted by academic or research institutions to ensure that researchers have the necessary support to carryout this important research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   649.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anleu S, Mack K. Magistrates’ everyday work and emotional labour. J Law Soc. 2005;32(4): 590–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth B, Humphrey RH. Emotional labour in service roles: the influence of identity. Acad Manag Rev. 1993;18:88–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Guidance and Counselling Association. Code of ethics. Canberra: Australian Guidance and Couselling Association; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Nursing Council. Code of conduct for nurses in Australia. Canberra: Australian Nursing Council; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Psychological Society. Code of ethics. Melbourne: Australian Psychological Society; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahn S. Keeping academic field researchers safe: ethical safeguards. J Acad Ethics. 2012;10(2): 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahn S, Weatherill P. Qualitative social research: a risky business when it comes to collecting ‘sensitive’ data. Qual Res. 2012; https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112439016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey S, Scales K, Llyod J, Schneider J, Jones R. The emotional labour of health-care assistants in inpatient dementia care. Ageing Soc. 2015;35(02):246–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Band-Winterstein T, Doron I, Naim S. ‘I take them with me’ – reflexivity in sensitive research. Reflective Pract. 2014;15(4):530–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellas ML. Emotional labor in academia: the case of professors. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 1999;561:91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoot C, Bilsen J. An auto-ethnographic study of the disembodied experience of a novice researcher doing qualitative cancer research. Qual Health Res. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315616625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloor M, Fincham B, Sampson H. Qualti (NCRM) commissioned inquiry into the risk to well-being of researchers in qualitative research. Cardiff ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. Cardiff University, Wales; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor M, Fincham B, Sampson H. Unprepared for the worst: risks of harm for qualitative researchers. Methodol Innov. 2010;5(1):45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowtell EC, Sawyer SM, Aroni RA, Green JB, Duncan RE. “Should I send a condolence card?” Promoting emotional safety in qualitative health research through reflexivity and ethical mindfulness. Qual Inq. 2013;19(9):652–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell R. Emotionally involved: the impact of researching rape. New York: Routledge; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll K. Infertile? The emotional labour of sensitive and feminist research methodologies. Qual Res. 2013;13(5):546–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles J, Astbury J, Dartnall E, Limjerwala S. A qualitative exploration of researcher trauma and researchers’ responses to investigating sexual violence. Violence Against Women. 2014;20(1):95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corden A, Sainsbury R, Sloper R, Ward B. Using a model of group psychotherapy to support social research on sensitive topics. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(2):151–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton S, Dollard M, de Jonge J, Whetham P. Clergy in crisis. In: Dollard M, Winefield AH, Winefield HR, editors. Occupational stress in the service professionals. London: Taylor and Francis; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington Y, Scott D. Qualitative research in practice: stories from the field. St. Leonards: Allen and Unwin; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson-Swift V, James E, Kippen S. Do university ethics committees adequately protect public health researchers? Aust N Z J Public Health. 2005;29(6):576–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson-Swift V, James EL, Kippen S, Liamputtong P. Risk to researchers in qualitative research on sensitive topics: issues and strategies. Qual Health Res. 2008;18(1):133–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson-Swift V, James BL, Kippen S, Liamputtong P. Researching sensitive topics: qualitative research as emotion work. Qual Res. 2009;9(1):61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etherington K. Working with traumatic stories: from transcriber to witness. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2007;10(2):85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahie D. Doing sensitive research sensitively: ethical and methodological issues in researching workplace bullying. Int J Qual Methods. 2014;13:17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham B, Scourfield J, Langer S. The impact of working with disturbing secondary data: reading suicide files in a coroner’s office. Qual Health Res. 2008;18(6):853–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick P, Olson RE. A rough road map to reflexivity in qualitative research into emotions. Emot Rev. 2015;7(1):49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gair S. In the thick of it: a reflective tale from an Australian social worker/qualitative researcher. Qual Health Res. 2002;12(1):130–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert KR. Collatoral damage? Indirect exposure of staff members to the emotions of qualitative research. In: Gilbert KR, editor. The emotional nature of qualitative research. London: CRC; 2001. p. 147–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandey A, Foo S, Groth M, Goodwin R. Free to be you and me: a climate of authenticity alleviates burnout from emotional labor. J Occup Health Psychol. 2012;17(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grauel T. Overseeing the overseers: supervision of christian clergy in Australia. In: McMahon M, Patton W, editors. Supervision in the helping professions: a practical approach. Sydney: Prentice Hall; 2002. p. 261–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory D, Russell CK, Phillips LR. Beyond textual perfection: transcribers as vulnerable persons. Qual Health Res. 1997;7(2):294–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris LC. The emotional labour of barristers: an exploration of emotional labour by status professionals. J Manag Stud. 2002;39(4):553–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild A. Emotion work, feeling rules and social structure. Am J Sociol. 1979;85:551–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild A. The managed heart: the commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard G, Backett-Milburn K, Kemmer D. Working with emotions Issues for the researcher in fieldwork and teamwork. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2001;4(2):119–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Federation of Social Workers. Ethics in social work: statement of principles. http://www.ifsw.org/. (2006).

  • Isenbarger L, Zembylas M. The emotional labour of caring in teaching. Teach Teach Educ. 2006;22(1):120–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafari A, Dunnett S, Hamilton K, Downey H. Exploring researcher vulnerability: contexts, complications, and conceptualisation. J Mark Manag. 2013;29(9–10):1182–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James N. Emotional labour: skill and work in the social regulation of feelings. Sociol Rev. 1989;37:15–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson N. The role of self and emotion within qualitative sensitive research: a reflective account. ENQUIRE. 2009;4:23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson B, Clarke J. Collecting sensitive data: the impact on the researchers. Qual Health Res. 2003;13(3):421–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy F, Hicks B, Yarker J. Challenges and work experiences of oncology researchers. Psycho-Oncology. 2012;21:14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon E, Hawker S. “Once would be enough”: some reflections on the issue of safety for lone researhers. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2000;2(4):313–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiyimba N, O’Reilly M. The risk of secondary traumatic stress in the qualitative transcription process: a research note. Qual Res. 2015;60:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115577013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiyimba N, O’Reilly M. An exploration of the possibility for secondary traumatic stress among transcriptionists: a grounded theory approach. Qual Res Psychol. 2016;13(1):92–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalor JG, Begley CM, Devane D. Exploring painful experiences: impact of emotional narratives on members of a qualitative research team. J Adv Nurs. 2006;56(6):607–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson EB, Yao X. Clinical empathy as emotional labor in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 2005;293(9):1100–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee RM. Dangerous fieldwork. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 1995.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee R, Lee Y. Methodological research on “sensitive” Topics: a decade review. Bull Sociol Methodol. 2012;114(1):35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee R, Renzetti C. The problems of researching sensitive topics. In: Renzetti CM, Lee RM, editors. Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park: SAGE; 1993. p. 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Treweek G, Linkogle S, editors. Danger in the field: risk and ethics in social research. London: Routledge; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Researching the vulnerable: a guide to sensitive research methods. London: SAGE; 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lovatt M, Nanton V, Roberts J, Ingleton C, Noble B, Pitt E, Seers K, Munday D. The provision of emotional labour by health care assistants caring for dying cancer patients in the community: a qualitative study into the experiences of health care assistants and bereaved family carers. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(1):271–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCosker H, Barnard A, Gerber R. Understanding sensitive research: issues and strategies for meeting the safety needs for all participants. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2001;2(1):1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckenzie SK, Li C, Jenkin G, Collings S. Ethical considerations in sensitive suicide research reliant on non-clinical researchers. Res Ethics. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116649996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mears A, Finlay W. Not just a paper doll: how models manage bodily capital and why they perform emotional labor. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2005;34(3):317–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell W, Irvine A. I’m okay, you’re okay?: reflections on the well-being and ethical requirements of researchers and research participants in conducting qualitative fieldwork interviews. Int J Qual Methods. 2008;7(4):31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran-Ellis J. Close to home: the experience of researching child sexual abuse. In: Hester M, Kelly L, Radford J, editors. Women, violence and male power. Buckingham: Open University; 1996. p. 176–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland K. Gender, emotional labour and teamworking in a call centre. Pers Rev. 2002;31(3): 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Health & Medical Research Council. National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council and Australian Vice Chancellors Committee; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noblet A. Building health promoting work settings: identifying the relationship between work characteristics and occupational stress in Australia. Health Promot Int. 2003;18(4):351–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogbonna E, Harris L. Work intensification and emotional labour among UK university lecturers: an exploratory study. Organ Stud. 2004;25(7):1185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker N, O’Reilly M. “We are alone in the house”: a case study addressing researcher safety and risk. Qual Res Psychol. 2013;10(4):341–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson BL, Gregory D, Thorne S. A protocol for researcher safety. Qual Health Res. 1999;9(2): 259–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisaniello SL, Winefield HR, Delfabbro PH. The influence of emotional labour and emotional work on the occupational health and wellbeing of South Australian hospital nurses. J Vocat Behav. 2012;80(3):579–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renzetti C, Lee RM, editors. Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park: SAGE; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowling L. Being in, being out, being with: affect and the role of the qualitative researcher in loss and grief research. Mortality. 1999;4(2):167–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson H, Bloor M, Fincham B. A price worth paying? Sociology. 2008;42(5):919–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders T. Controllable laughter: managing sex work through humour. Sociology. 2004;38(2): 273–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz MD, editor. Researching sexual violence against women: methodological and personal perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma U, Black P. Look good, feel better: beauty therapy as emotional labour. Sociology. 2001;35(4):913–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherry E. The vulnerable researcher: facing the challenges of sensitive research. Qual Res J. 2013;13(3):278–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Social Research Association. A code of practice for the safety of social researchers. 2006. Available at http://www.the-sra.org.uk/documents/word/safety_code_of_practice.doc. Accessed 19 Sept 2007.

  • Stets JE, Turner JH. Handbook of the sociology of emotions. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen J. The smile factory work at Disneyland. In: Frost PJ, Louis LF, Lundberg CC, Martin J, editors. Reframing organizational culture. Newbury Park: SAGE; 1990. p. 58–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr D. Stories in the flesh and voices in the head: reflections on the context and impact of research with disadvantaged populations. Qual Health Res. 2004;14(4):578–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes L, Cummings J, Haigh C. Transcriptionist saturation: knowing too much about sensitive health and social data. J Adv Nurs. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodby L, Williams B, Wittich A, Burgio K. Expanding the notion of researcher distress: the cumulative effects of coding. Qual Health Res. 2011;21(6):830–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wray N, Markovic M, Manderson L. “Researcher saturation”: the impact of data triangulation and intensive-research practices on the researcher and qualitative research process. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(10):1392–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LaTrobe Rural Health School, College of Science, Health and Engineering, LaTrobe University, Bendigo, VIC, Australia

    Virginia Dickson-Swift

Authors
  1. Virginia Dickson-Swift
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Virginia Dickson-Swift .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia

    Pranee Liamputtong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Dickson-Swift, V. (2019). Emotion and Sensitive Research. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_141

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation