Abstract
Health elites are powerful actors in the medical domain and it is essential that social scientists engage with their work. However, there is a specific set of methodological challenges to conducting this research. This chapter articulates key issues to consider before undertaking research with health elites by drawing upon examples from the authors’ own research practice. It starts by identifying the ambiguities in defining exactly what constitutes a health elite by drawing upon important literature on the topic. Section 2 discusses ethical issues in health elite research, including providing a sample consent form. It then articulates sampling and access issues with elites, for example, the benefits of purposive and snowball sampling. Section 3 articulates key challenges firstly in interviews and secondly in observational work with health elites (in clinics and laboratories), by stressing the need for flexibility in approach. This is followed by a discussion of conferences as sites for research among health elites, and the resources of elites’ documentary cultures. Section 4 reflects upon the increasing significance of patients and social scientists as health elites, and instances of health elites as social scientists. Section 5 considers health elites as collaborators by discussing the rewards and challenges of collaborating with fellow researchers active in generating new knowledge about health. The chapter closes by pointing forward toward the continued need for qualitative social science to engage with health elites, and for researchers to be informed by a methodological awareness of the challenges and rewards of doing so.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aldridge A. Negotiating status: social scientists and the Anglican clergy. J Contemp Ethnogr. 1993;22:97–112.
Atkinson P. For ethnography. London: Sage; 2015.
Blix SB, Wettergren Å. The emotional labour of gaining and maintaining access to the field. Qual Res. 2015;15(6):688–704.
Cassell J. The relationship of observer to observed when studying up. In: Burgess RG, editor. Studies in qualitative methodology. London: JAI Press; 1988. p. 89–108.
Collins HM. Gravity’s shadow: the search for gravitational waves. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2004.
Collins H, Evans R. Rethinking expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2007.
Dexter LA. Elite and specialised interviewing. Evanston: Northwestern University Press; 1970.
Dimond R. Patient and family trajectories of mitochondrial disease: diversity, uncertainty and genetic risk. Life Sci, Soc Policy. 2013;9(1):2.
Dimond R. Parent-led conferences as sites of medical work. Health. 2014a;18(6):631–45.
Dimond R. Negotiating blame and responsibility in the context of a ‘de novo’ mutation. New Genet Soc. 2014b;33(2):149–66.
Dimond R. Negotiating identity at the intersection of paediatric and genetic medicine: the parent as facilitator, narrator and patient. Sociol Health Illn. 2014c;36(1):1–14.
Dimond R. Techniques of donation: ‘three parents’, anonymity and disclosure. J Med Law Ethics. 2015a;3(3):165–73.
Dimond R. Social and ethical issues in mitochondrial donation. Br Med Bull. 2015b;115(1):173–82.
Dimond R, Bartlett A, Lewis JT. What binds biosociality? The collective effervescence of the parent conference. Soc Sci Med. 2015;126:1–8.
Epstein S. Impure science: AIDS, activism and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley, California: University of California Press; 1996.
González-Santos S, Dimond R. Medical and scientific conferences as sites of sociological interest: a review of the field. Sociol Compass. 2015;9(3):235–45.
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice. 3rd ed. London: Routledge; 2007.
Harvey WS. Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qual Res. 2011;11(4):431–41.
Hunter A. Local knowledge and local power: notes on the ethnography of local community elites. J Contemp Ethnogr. 1993;22:35–58.
Israel M. Research ethics and integrity for social scientists: beyond regulatory compliance. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2015.
Kent J. Lay experts and the politics of breast implants. Public Underst Sci. 2003;12(4):403–21.
Lassiter L. The Chicago guide to collaborative ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2005.
Lewis J, Bartlett A. Inscribing a discipline: tensions in the field of bioinformatics. New Genet Soc. 2013;32(3):243–63.
Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Luam C, Sima J. Interviewing one's peers: methodological issues in a study of health professionals. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2006;24(4):251–6.
Mallik M. Patient representatives: a new role in patient advocacy. Br J Nurs. 1997;6(2):108–13.
Mikecz R. Interviewing elites addressing methodological issues. Qual Inq. 2012;18(6):482–93.
Morrissey C. On oral history interviewing. In: Dexter LA, editor. Elite and specialised interviewing. Evanston: Northwestern University Press; 1970. p. 109–18.
Odendahl T, Shaw AM. Interviewing elites. In: Gubrium JF, Holstein JA, editors. Handbook of interview research: context & method. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002. p. 299–316.
O'Riordan K, Fotopoulou A, Stephens N. The first bite: imaginaries, promotional publics and the laboratory grown burger. Public Underst Sci. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516639001.
Ostrander SA. Surely you’re not in this just to be helpful – access, rapport, and interviews in three studies of elites. J Contemp Ethnogr. 1993;22:7–27.
Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2015.
Payne G, Payne J. Key concepts in social research. Sage key concepts. London: Sage; 2004.
Petkov MP, Kaoullas LG. Overcoming respondent resistance at elite interviews using an intermediary. Qual Res. 2016;16(4):411–29.
Prior L. Using documents in social research. London: Sage; 2003.
Roth D. A third seat at the table: an insider's perspective on patient representatives. Hastings Cent Rep. 2011;41(1):29–31.
Stacey G, Stephens N. Social science in a stem cell laboratory: what happened when social and life sciences met. Regen Med. 2012;7(1):117–26.
Stark L, Hedgecoe A. A practical guide to research ethics. In: Bourgeault I, Dingwall R, De Vries R, editors. The sage handbook of qualitative methods in health research. London: Sage; 2010. p. 589–607.
Stephens N. Collecting data from elites and ultra elites: telephone and face-to-face interviews with macroeconomists. Qual Res. 2007;7(2):203–16.
Stephens N. Growing meat in laboratories: the promise, ontology, and ethical boundary-work of using muscle cells to make food. Configurations. 2013;21(2):159–81.
Stephens N, Dimond R. Unexpected tissue and the biobank that closed: an exploration of value and the momentariness of bio-objectification processes. Life Sci, Soc Policy. 2015a;11(1):14.
Stephens N, Dimond R. Closure of a human tissue biobank: individual, institutional, and field expectations during cycles of promise and disappointment. New Genet Soc. 2015b;34(4):417–36.
Stephens N, Atkinson P, Glasner P. The UK stem cell bank: securing the past, validating the present, protecting the future. Sci Cult. 2008a;17(1):43–56.
Stephens N, Atkinson P, Glasner P. The UK stem cell bank as performative architecture. New Genet Soc. 2008b;27(2):87–98.
Stephens N. In Vitro Meat: Zombies on the Menu? Scripted. 2010;7(2):394–401.
Stephens N, Atkinson P, Glasner P. Documenting the doable and doing the documented: bridging strategies at the UK stem cell bank. Soc Stud Sci. 2011;41(6):791–813.
Stephens N, Atkinson P, Glasner P. Institutional imaginaries of publics in stem cell banking: the cases of the UK and Spain. Sci Cult. 2013a;22(4):497–515.
Stephens N, Lewis J, Atkinson P. Closing the regulatory regress: GMP accreditation in stem cell laboratories. Sociol Health Illn. 2013b;35(3):345–60.
Zuckerman H. Scientific elite. New Brunswick: Transaction; 1996.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Stephens, N., Dimond, R. (2019). Researching Among Elites. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_135
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_135
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5250-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5251-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences