Abstract
Qualitative data analysis software (QDAS) has much to offer the health researcher. Software facilitates efficient management of qualitative and mixed methods data through a variety of tools to organize and keep track of multiple data sources and types and of the ideas flowing from those data. Coding tools provide structure to the categories and themes evidenced in the data, allowing for rapid retrieval of information. Increased depth and rigor of analysis are facilitated through capacity to search and interrogate the data sources using a combination of coding and other data management tools. Questions can be asked about how often and how different categories or themes are expressed by different groups within a sample or within different contexts or times. Similarly, experiential data might be compared for those with different measures on health-related variables. Relationships between different aspects of experience (or attitudes or feelings, etc.) can be explored and/or verified using coding queries, through a range of visual displays, or through statistical analyses using exported coding information. Such queries can be limited to one type of data, or multiple types of sources can be imported, coded, and analyzed together. Linking tools are used throughout to connect reflective thoughts to the data that prompted them or interim results to the evidence that supports them. Explanations of these processes are illustrated by figures and examples.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams NA. A crowd content analysis assembly line: scaling up hand-coding with text units of analysis. Social Science Research Network (SSRN). 2016. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2808731.
Bazeley P. Qualitative data analysis: practical strategies. London: Sage; 2013.
Bazeley P, Jackson K. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2013.
Bowers BJ. Grounded theory. In: Sarter B, editor. Paths to knowledge: innovative research methods for nursing, vol. 15–2233. New York: National League for Nursing; 1989. p. 33–59.
Carcary M. The research audit trail – enhancing trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry. Electron J Bus Res Methods. 2009;7(1):11–24.
Gilbert LS. Going the distance: ‘closeness’ in qualitative data analysis software. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2002;5(3):215–28.
Huber M, Knottnerus JA, Green L, van der Horst H, Jadad AR, Kromhout D, … Smid H. How should we define health? Br Med J. 2011;343(d4163):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4163.
Jackson K. Where qualitative researchers and technologies meet: lessons from interactive digital art. Qual Inq. in press. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417731086.
Liamputtong P. Health, illness and well-being: an introduction to social determinants of health. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Social determinants of health: individuals, society and healthcare. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; in press.
Liamputtong P, Serry T. Making sense of qualitative data. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 421–36.
Mertens DM, Bazeley P, Bowleg L, Fielding N, Maxwell J, Molina-AzorÃn JF, Niglas K. The future of mixed methods: a five year projection to 2020. Mixed Methods International Research Association. 2016. Retrieved from www.mmira.org.
Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.
Richards L. Handling qualitative data. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2014.
Strauss AL. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
Williams ML, Burnap P. Crime sensing with social media. Methods news: newsletter from the National Centre for Research Methods. 2015.
Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Bazeley, P. (2019). Using Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS) to Assist Data Analyses. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_108
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_108
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5250-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5251-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences