Skip to main content

International Children’s Rights Law: General Principles

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
International Human Rights of Children

Part of the book series: International Human Rights ((IHR))

Abstract

This chapter introduces the general principles of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

It defines “the child” under this law and discusses the usage of age as a sole indicator for offering protection for vulnerable human beings, as well as the dispute over the rights that the unborn child might have. The chapter also discusses the four guiding principles of the Convention: the right to nondiscrimination (Article 2); the principle of the best interests of the child (Article 3); the right to life, survival, and development (Article 6); and the right to participation (Article 12). The chapter further discusses the key rules of interpretation regarding the Convention, including how to apply a “child-centered approach” to matters concerning children and how to balance the rights of the child with the rights of others, including parents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 359.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • A (Letter to a Young Person), Re (Rev 1) (2017) EWFC 48 (26 July 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramson B (2008) Article 2: the right of non-discrimination. In: Alen A, Vande Lanotte J, Verhellen E, Ang F, Berghmans E, Verheyde M (eds) A commentary on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderson P, Hawthorne J, Killen M (2005) The participation rights of premature babies. Int J Child Rights 13:31–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alston P (1990) The unborn child and abortion under the draft Convention on the Rights of the Child. Hum Rights Q 12:156–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artavia Murillo et al (2012) (In Vitro Fertilization) v Costa Rica Preliminary objections, merits, reparations, and costs, judgment, Inter-American Court of Human Rights (ser C) No. 257 (28 November 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker RS (2016) Inverting human rights: the Inter-American Court versus Costa Rica. Univ Miami Law Rev 47:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Beemyn BG (2005) Making campuses more inclusive of transgender students. J Gay Lesbian Issues Educ 3:177–187. https://doi.org/10.1300/J367v03n01_08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besson S (2005) The principle of non-discrimination in the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Int J Child Rights 13:433–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broughton F (2016) Overstepping the mark? Int J Child Rights 24:687–717

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss E (2009) What law should (and should not) learn from child development research. Hofstra Law Rev 38:13–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattanach v Harrison (2016) 307 FLR 188

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave E (2014) Goodbye Gillick? Identifying and resolving problems with the concept of child competence. Leg Stud 34:103–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Criminal Procedure Amendment (Child Sexual Offence Evidence Pilot) Bill 2015 (NSW)

    Google Scholar 

  • DH v Czech Republic App no 57325/00 (ECtHR, 13 November 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimoulias K (2017) At the ‘center’: young people’s involvement in youth centers from design to usage. In: Bishop K, Corkery L (eds) Designing cities with children and young people. Routledge, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas H, Walsh T (2013) Continuing the stolen generation: child protection interventions and indigenous people. Int J Child Rights 21:59–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eekelaar J (2016) Two dimensions of the best interests principle: decisions about children and decision affecting children. In: Sutherland E, Macfarlane B (eds) Implementing Article 3 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 99–111

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman M (2006) Rethinking Gillick. Int J Child Rights 13:201–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman M (2007) Article 3 – the best interests of the child. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman M (2012) Towards a sociology of children’s rights. In: Freeman M (ed) Law and childhood studies: current legal issues, vol 14. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 29–38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gillick v West Norfolk (1986) AC 112

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafen BC, Hafen JO (1996) Abandoning children to their autonomy: the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Harv Int Law J 37:449–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson K, Lundy L (2017) Does exactly what it says on the tin? A critical analysis and alternative conceptualisation of the so-called ‘general principles’ of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Int J Child Rights 25:285–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris-Short S (2003) International human rights law: imperialist, inept and ineffective? Cultural relativism and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Hum Rights Q 25:130–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins B (ed) (2005) The Cambridge encyclopedia of child development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • King M, Piper C (1995) How the law thinks about children, 2nd edn. Arena, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancashire County Council v M (Rev 1) (2016) EWFC 9 (4 February 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown G, Jimerson S, Shahroozi R (2014) Children’s rights and school psychology: children’s right to participation. J Sch Psychol 52:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law L (2010) Racism and ethnicity: global debates, dilemmas, directions. Pearson Education, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee N (2001) Childhood and society. Open University Press, Gosport

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundy L (2007) Voice is not enough: conceptualising Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Br Educ Res J 45:927–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurás M (2011) Public policies and child rights: entering the third decade of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 633:52–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire JK, Anderson CR, Toomey RB, Russell ST (2010) School climate for transgender youth: a mixed method investigation of student experiences and school responses. J Youth Adolesc 39:1175–1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9540-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minister for Health v AS (2004) 29 WAR 517

    Google Scholar 

  • Mnookin RH (1975) Child custody adjudication: judicial functions in the face of indeterminacy. Law Contempy Probl 39:226–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan A (2010) The child as ‘democratic citizen’: challenging the ‘participation gap’. Public Law:767–782. ISSN 0033-3565

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan A (2013) Economic and social rights, budgets and the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Int J Child Rights 21:248–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak M (2005) Article 6: the right to life, survival and development. In: Alen A, Vande Lanotte J, Verhellen E, Ang F, Berghmans E, Verheyde M (eds) A commentary on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, vol 6. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) (2007) Legislative history of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, vol 1. United Nations, New York/Geneva, HR/PUB/07/1. Available via OHCHR. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/LegislativeHistorycrc1en.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization of African Unity (OAU) (1990) African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, 11 July 1990, CAB/LEG/24.9/49

    Google Scholar 

  • Oršuš v Croatia App no 15766/03 (ECtHR, 16 March 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peleg N (2013) Children and the capability approach. Int J Child Rights 21:523–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg N (2018) Marginalisation by the court: the case of Roma children and the European court of human rights. Hum Rights Law Rev 18:111. (forthcoming)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prout A, James A (1997) A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance promise and problems. In: James A, Prout A (eds) Constructing and reconstructing childhood, 2nd edn. Routledge, London, pp 7–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Quennerstedt A (2015) Education and children’s rights. In: Vandenhole W, Desmet E, Reynaert D, Lembrechts S (eds) Routledge international handbook of children’s rights studies. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper v Simmons 543 US 551 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhe K M, De Clercq E, Wangmo T and Elger B S (2016) Relational capacity: broadening the notion of decision-making capacity in paediatric healthcare. J Bioeth Inq 13:515–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-016-9735-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S v Makwanyane (CCT3/94) (1995) ZACC 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg K (2015) The rights of LGBTI children under the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Nord J Hum Rights 33:337–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2015.1128701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheppers E, van Dongen E, Dekker J, Geertzen J, Dekker J (2006) Potential barriers to the use of health services among ethnic minorities: a review. Fam Pract 23:325–348. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmi113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane Re (2013) FamCA 864

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloth-Nielsen J, Mezmur BD (2009) Out of the starting blocks: the 12th and 13th sessions of the African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child. Afr Hum Rights Law J 9:336–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Solner S (2007) The ‘breakthrough’ of the right to food: the meaning of general comment no 12 and the voluntary guidelines for the interpretation of the human right to food. Max Planck Yearbook U N Law 11:391–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell ER, Peterson BS, Thompson PM, Welcome SE, Henkenius AL, Toga AW (2003) Mapping cortical change across the human life span. Nat Neurosci 6:309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir S (2016) Postnatal human genetic enhancement: a consideration of children’s right to be genetically enhanced. Front Sociol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2016.00015. Available via Frontiers in Sociology. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsoc.2016.00015/full. Accessed 31 Jan 2017

  • Thomas N (2007) Toward a theory of child participation. Int J Child Rights 15:199–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thukral EG (2013) Budget for children. In: Nolan A, O’Connell R, Harvey C (eds) Human rights and public finance. Hart, Oxford, pp 139–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall EKM (2016) Conceptualizing children and young people’s participation: examining vulnerability, social accountability and co-production. Int J Hum Rights 21:59–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1248125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin J (2006) Beyond the supermarket shelf: using a rights based approach to address children’s health needs. Int J Child Rights 14:275–306. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181806778458103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin J (2009) Judging the judges: are they adopting the rights approach in matters involving children? Melb Univ Law Rev 33:579

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin J (2011) Courts and the construction of childhood: a new way of thinking. In: Freeman M (ed) Law and childhood studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Commission on Human Rights (‘UNCHR’), Draft Convention on the Rights of the Child, Working paper submitted by the chairman, text as adopted at first reading with suggested revisions, 24 Nov 1988, E/CN.4/1989/WG.1/WP.2

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (‘UNCESCR’), General comment no 15: The right to water (arts 11 and 12 of the Covenant), 20 January 2003, E/C.12/2002/11

    Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly (UNGA), Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol 1577, p 3

    Google Scholar 

  • UN High Commissioner for Human Rights(2007) Legislative History of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, vol 1, pp 301–313

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Human Rights Committee (‘UNHRC’), CCPR general comment no 14: article 6 (right to life) nuclear weapons and the right to life, adopted at the twenty-third session of the Human Rights Committee on 9 November 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCHR, Report of the working group on a draft Convention on the Rights of the Child, 6 April 1988, E/CN.4/1988/28

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, Concluding observation: Australia, 10 October 1997, CRC/C/15/Add.79

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, Concluding observation: Australia, 28 August 2012, CRC/C/AUS/CO/4

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, Concluding observation: Austria, 31 March 2005, CRC/C/15/Add.25131

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, Concluding observation: Bangladesh, 18 June 1997, CRC/C/15/Add.74

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, Concluding observation: Benin, 24 August 1999, CRC/C/15/Add. 106

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, Concluding observation: Cyprus, 7 June 1996, CRC/C/15/Add.59

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, Concluding observation: Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, 27 March 2009, CRC/C/PRK/CO/4

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, Concluding observation: Ethiopia, 21 February 2000, CRC/C/15/Add.146

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, Concluding observation: Honduras, 24 October 1994, CRC/C/15/Add.24

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, Concluding observation: Libya Arab Jamahiriya, 4 February 1998, CRC/C/15/Add.84

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, Concluding observation: Madagascar, 27 October 2003, CRC/C/15/Add.218

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, Concluding observation: Maldives, 13 July 2007, CRC/C/MDV/CO/3

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, Concluding observation: Nepal, 21 September 2005, CRC/C/15/Add.261

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, Concluding observation: Republic of Chad, 12 February 2009, CRC/C/TCD/CO/2

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, Concluding observation: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, 12 July 2016, CRC/C/GBR/CO/5

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, Concluding observations: Israel, 9 October 2002, CRC/C/15/Add. 195

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, Concluding observations: Israel, 4 July 2013, CRC/C/ISR/CO/2-4

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, General Comment no 3 (2003) HIV/AIDS and the rights of the child, 17 March 2003, CRC/GC/2003/3

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, General Comment no 4 (2003) Adolescent health and development in the context of the convention on the rights of the child, 1 July 2003, CRC/GC/4/2003

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, General Comment no 5 (2003) General measures of implementation of the convention on the rights of the child, 27 November 2003, CRC/GC/2003/5

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, General Comment no 8 (2007) The rights of the child for protection from corporal punishment and other cruel or degrading forms of punishment, 2 March 2007, CRC/GC/8

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, General Comment no 10 (2007) Children’s rights in juvenile justice, 25 April 2007, CRC/C/GC/10

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, General Comment no 11 (2009) Indigenous children and their rights under the convention, 12 February 2009, CRC/C/GC/11

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, General Comment no 12 (2009) The right of the child to be heard, 20 July 2009, CRC/C/GC/12

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, General Comment no 13 (2011) on the right of the child to freedom from all forms of violence, 18 April 2011, CRC/C/GC/13

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, General Comment no 14 (2013) on the right of the child to have his or her best interests taken as a primary consideration (art. 3, para. 1), 29 May 2013, CRC/C/GC/14

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, General Comment no 15 (2013) on the right of the child to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health (Art 24), 17 April 2013, CRC/C/GC/15

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, General Comment no 19 (2016) on public budgeting for the realization of children’s rights (art 4), 29 July 2016, CRC/C/GC/19

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC, General Comment no 20 (2016) on the implementation of the rights of the child during adolescence, 6 December 2016, CRC/C/GC/20

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (2007) Implementation handbook for the convention on the rights of the child, 3rd edn. UNICEF, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veerman PE (2010) The ageing of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Int J Child Rights 18:585–618. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181810X522360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villagrán-Morales v Guatemala, Decision and Judgment, Inter-American Court of Human Rights (ser C) No 63 (19 November 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • World Declaration on the Survival, Protection and Development of Children in the 1990s, adopted by the World Summit for Children at New York on 30 September 1990 A/45/625, Annex

    Google Scholar 

  • X v Sydney Children’s Hospital (2013) 85 NSWLR 294

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noam Peleg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Peleg, N. (2019). International Children’s Rights Law: General Principles. In: Kilkelly, U., Liefaard, T. (eds) International Human Rights of Children. International Human Rights. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4184-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics