Skip to main content

Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function (BEF) Theory and Wetland Restoration

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Wetland Book
  • 216 Accesses

Abstract

Biodiversity-ecosystem function (BEF) theory was founded on the idea that levels of ecosystem functions (e.g., productivity, nutrient cycling, decomposition) and the stability of those functions depend directly on levels of biodiversity, including diversity of all biota at the level of genotypes, species, and functional groups (sets of physiologically or morphologically similar species). Ecosystem functions are typically estimated from measures of stocks, e.g., plant biomass or nutrient crop, in response to vascular plant diversity (which can be easily manipulated in experiments). To date, the vast majority of experimental tests indicate that, on average, diversity increases productivity. Experimental outcomes have prompted BEF researchers to call on restorationists to apply BEF theory by establishing more diverse biotic communities to increase ecosystem function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bouchard V, Frey SD, Gilbert JM, Reed SE. Effects of macrophyte functional group richness on emergent freshwater wetland functions. Ecology. 2007;88:2903–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw AD. Ecological principles and land reclamation practice. Landscape Plan. 1984;11:35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway JC, Sullivan G, Zedler JB. Species-rich plantings increase biomass and nitrogen accumulation in a wetland restoration experiment. Ecol Appl. 2003;13:1626–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale BJ, Matulich KL, Hooper DU, Byrnes JE, Duffy E, Gamfeldt L, et al. The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. Am J Bot. 2011;98:572–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty JM, Zedler JB. Dominant graminoids support restoration of productivity but not diversity in urban wetlands. Ecol Eng. in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty JM, Callaway JC, Zedler JB. Diversity-function relationships changed in a long-term restoration experiment. Ecol Appl. 2011;21:2143–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt KAM, Ritchie ME. Effects of macrophyte species richness on wetland ecosystem functioning and services. Nature. 2001;411:687–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson C, Bostrom C. Biodiversity influences ecosystem functioning in aquatic angiosperm communities. Oikos. 2011;120:1037–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hector A, Bagchi R. Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature. 2007;448:188–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hector A, Schmid B, Beierkuhnlein C, Caldeira MC, Diemer M, Dimitrakopoulos PG, et al. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science. 1999;286:1123–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keer GH, Zedler JB. Salt marsh canopy architecture differs with the number and composition of species. Ecol Appl. 2002;12:456–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Mateos D, Power ME, Comin FA, Yockteng R. Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. Plos Biol. 2012;10:e1001247. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in restored ecosystems: extracting principles for a synthetic perspective. In: Falk DA, Palmer MA, Zedler JB, editors. Foundations of restoration ecology. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2006. p. 210–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson ER, Doherty JM. The legacy of pipeline installation on the soil and vegetation of southeast Wisconsin wetlands. Ecol Eng. 2012;39:53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz R, Andrews S, O’Reilly L, Bouchard V, Frey S. Plant community composition more predictive than diversity of carbon cycling in freshwater wetlands. Wetlands. 2011;31:965–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan G, Callaway JC, Zedler JB. Plant assemblage composition explains and predicts how biodiversity affects salt marsh functioning. Ecol Monogr. 2007;77:569–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D. The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology. 1999;80:1455–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Reich PB, Knops JMH. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature. 2006;441:629–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to James Doherty or Joy Zedler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Doherty, J., Zedler, J. (2016). Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function (BEF) Theory and Wetland Restoration. In: Finlayson, C., et al. The Wetland Book. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6172-8_325-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6172-8_325-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6172-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics