Introduction
Since transgenic crops first took root, they have been embroiled in numerous controversies from questions about their safety to the future of the food system. Today, transgenic crops make up a considerable portion of the planted areas of crops such as soy, corn, cotton, and canola, but find very little adoption in other sectors. Farmer adoption of transgenic soy happened so quickly that by some measures it is often described as the most rapidly adopted agricultural technology in human history. While some agricultural sectors have benefited from transgenic crop adoption, they remain much maligned in wider discussions about agricultural sustainability. Before describing these apprehensions toward transgenic crops, this section describes what transgenic crops are and how they are made.
The term transgenic is used as an adjective to describe an organism where genes have been moved from one...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Alstad, D., & Andow, D. (1995). Managing the evolution of insect resistance to transgenic plants. Science, 268, 1894–1896.
Altieri, M. (2000). The ecological impacts of transgenic crops on agroecosystem health. Ecosystem Health, 6, 13–23.
Andow, D. (2003). UK farm-scale evaluations of transgenic herbicide-tolerant crops. Nature Biotechnology, 21, 1453–1454.
Busch, L., Lacy, W., Burkhart, J., & Lacy, L. (1991). Plants, power, and profit: Social, economic, and ethical consequences of the new biotechnologies. Chicago: Blackwells.
Fowler, C., & Mooney, P. (1990). Shattering: Food, politics, and the loss of genetic diversity. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Kloppenburg, J. (2004). First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Krimsky, S., & Plough, A. (1988). Environmental hazards: Communicating risks as a social process. Dover: Auburn House Publishing.
Lacy, W. (2000). Commercialization of university research brings benefits, raises issues and concerns. California Agriculture, 54, 72–79.
Letourneau, D., & Burrows, B. (Eds.). (2002). Genetically engineered organisms: Assessing the environmental and human health effects. New York: CRC Press.
Mulvaney, D., Krupnik, T., & Koffler, K. (2011). Transgenic rice evaluated for risks to marketability. California Agriculture, 65, 161–167.
National Research Council. (2002). Environmental effects of transgenic plants: The scope and adequacy of regulation. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
Quist, D., & Chapela, I. (2001). Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico. Nature, 414, 541–543.
Snow, A., et al. (2004). Genetically engineered organisms and the environment: Current status and recommendations. Ecological Applications, 13, 279–286.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Mulvaney, D. (2013). Transgenic Crops. In: Thompson, P., Kaplan, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_100-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_100-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6167-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Transgenic Crops- Published:
- 22 July 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_100-3
-
Original
Transgenic Crops- Published:
- 10 February 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_100-2