Abstract
Confidentiality is an age-old feature of health care, particularly in the Western tradition: what is said or done within the therapeutic encounter should remain between patient and provider. In modern times, medical confidentiality has been regulated either by deontological rules, in the Anglo-Saxon tradition, or by public law (Criminal Code), as with the French “secret médical.” A third orientation is now to see confidentiality as a dimension of human rights (public health in general is going in this direction). Confidentiality has as its first goal protecting the interests of the patient: the patient is the master/ruler of that “secrecy”; that is, he or she decides freely whether to disclose whatever data related to his or her health or treatment, how and when. In most legal systems and in addition to the duty to inform spontaneously and completely the patient, the provider cannot refuse to transmit medical data to others if the patient requests it.
The emphasis on respect of the patient’s privacy is relatively new, flowing from the dignity recognized in all human beings. For centuries, medical practice was marked by paternalism, sometimes authoritarian and not likely to welcome criticisms or refusal of care. Until recently, the patient’s privacy was often, practically, a minor concern of care providers. Today, biomedical (e.g., in genetics, communicable diseases) and social developments give rise to delicate questions in terms of an individual’s privacy and his or her responsibility regarding possible impacts on the health and welfare of others and the community. To be kept in mind are issues about the right of providers to have their privacy respected.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Council of Europe. (1997). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Adopted at Oviedo on 4 April 1997.
Hébert, P. C. (1996). Doing right (A practical guide to ethics for medical trainees and physicians). Toronto/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoerni, B., & Bénézech, M. (1996). Le secret médical – Confidentialité et discrétion en médecine. Paris: Masson.
International Bioethics Committee of UNESCO (IBC). (2008). Report on consent. Paris: UNESCO.
Martin, J. F. (2009). Persons without the capacity to consent (chapter 9). In H. ten Have & M. Jean (Eds.), The UNESCO Universal declaration on bioethics and human rights – background, principles and applications (Ethics series), p. 139–153. UNESCO Publishing.
Martin, J., & Guillod, O. (2000). Medical confidentiality – Which attitude by the professional when outside institutions or persons ask for information about a patient ? [in French]. Schweiz. Aerztezeitung/Bulletin des médecins suisses, 81, 2047–2052.
Morais, Y. (2001). Secret médical (Medical confidentiality). In G. Hottois & J.-N. Missa (Eds.), Nouvelle encyclopédie de bioéthique (pp. 725–729). Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.
Stiennon, J. A. (2009). Privacy and confidentiality (chapter 11). In H. ten Have & M. Jean (Eds.), The UNESCO Universal declaration on bioethics and human rights – background, principles and applications (Ethics series), p. 165–171. UNESCO.
ten Have, H., & Jean, M. (Eds.) (2009). The UNESCO universal declaration on bioethics and human rights – Background, principles and applications (Ethics series). Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (1997). Universal declaration on the human genome and human rights. Adopted unanimously by the UNESCO General Conference on 11 November 1997.
UNESCO. (2005a). Explanatory memorandum on the elaboration of the preliminary draft declaration on universal norms in bioethics. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2005b). Universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. Adopted unanimously by the UNESCO General Conference on 19 October 2005.
UNESCO Ethics Education Programme. (2011a). Casebook on human dignity and human rights (Casebook series, No. 1). Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO Ethics Education Programme. (2011b). Casebook on benefit and harm (Casebook series, No. 2). Paris: UNESCO.
Vaud (Canton of Vaud, Switzerland). (2002). Law on public health (in French). Article 80a, modification of March 19, 2002.
WHO. (1995). Promotion of the rights of patients in Europe. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Martin, J.F. (2014). Privacy and Confidentiality. In: ten Have, H., Gordijn, B. (eds) Handbook of Global Bioethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2512-6_72
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2512-6_72
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2511-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2512-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law