Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Levels of Uncertainty

  • Reference work entry
Handbook of Risk Theory

Abstract

There exist a variety of different understandings, definitions, and classifications of risk, which can make the resulting landscape of academic literature on the topic seem somewhat disjointed and often confusing. In this chapter, I will introduce a map on how to think about risks, and in particular uncertainty, which is arranged along the different questions of what the different academic disciplines find interesting about risk. This aims to give a more integrated idea of where the different literatures intersect and thus provide some order in our understanding of what risk is and what is interesting about it. One particular dimension will be presented in more detail, answering the question of what exactly we are uncertain about and distinguishing between five different levels of uncertainty. I will argue, through some concrete examples, that concentrating on the objects of uncertainty can give us an appreciation on how different perspectives on a given risk scenario are formed and will use the more general map to show how this perspective intersects with other classifications and analyses of risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aven T, Renn O (2009) On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain. J Risk Res 12(11):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailer-Jones DM (2003) Scientists’ thoughts on scientific models. Perspect Sci 10:275–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell S, Currie G (2006) Against beck: in defence of risk analysis. Philos Soc Sci 36(2):149–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle T (1871) Oliver cromwell’s letters and speeches: with elucidations. Scribner, Welford, New York. http://www.gasl.org/refbib/Carlyle__Cromwell.pdf. Accessed 1 Sep 2010

  • Douglas M (1992) Risk and blame. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards A, Elwy G, Covey J, Matthews E, Pill R (2001) Presenting risk information – a review of the effects of “framing” and other manipulations on patient outcomes. J Health Commun 6:61–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2010) Implementation of directive 2009/31/EC on the geological storage of carbon dioxide. http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/lowcarbon/docs/GD1-CO2%20storage%20life%20cycle%20risk%20management-consultation.pdf. Accessed 31 Dec 2010

  • Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1990) Uncertainty and quality in science for public policy. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25:739–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1999) Risk and responsibility. Mod Law Rev 62:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G (2002) Reckoning with risk. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies D (2000) Philosophical theories of probability. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenpeace (2008) False hope: why carbon capture and storage won’t save the climate. Greenpeace International, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking I (1975) The emergence of probability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillerbrand R (2009) Epistemic uncertainties in climate predictions. A challenge for practical decision making. Intergenerational Just Rev 9(3):94–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeting J, Madigan D, Raftery A, Volinsky CT (1999) Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial. Stat Sci 14:382–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg MA (2007) Social identity and the group context of trust: managing risk and building trust through belonging. In: Gutscher H, Siegrist M, Earle TC (eds) Trust in cooperative risk management. Earthscan, London, pp 51–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Itaoka K, Saito A, Akai M (2004) Public acceptance of CO2 capture and storage technology: a survey of public opinion to explore influential factors. In: Rubin ES, Keith DW, Gilboy CF (eds) Proceedings of 7th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, 31 volume 1: Peer-reviewed papers and plenary presentations, IEA Greenhouse Gas Program, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff S (2003) Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41:223–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers A (2009) Slapen met de ramen dicht. Natuur-Wetenschap & Techniek (NWT) 77(4):24–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers A (2010) The view from technological journalism. FENCO workshop “CCS and public engagement”, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Joffe H (1999) Risk and “the other”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes JM (1937) The general theory. Q J Econ 51:209–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight FH (1971) Risk, uncertainty and profit (reprint of the 1921 edn). University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahsen M (2005) Seductive simulations? Uncertainty distribution around climate models. Soc Stud Sci 35(6):895–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mander S, Polson D, Roberts T, Curtis A (2010) Risk from CO2 storage in saline aquifers: a comparison of lay and expert perceptions of risk. GHGT10, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici S (2000) Social representations. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton J, Brown J, Mysiak J (2006) To what extent, and how, might uncertainty be defined? Comments engendered by “Defining uncertainty: a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support”: Walker et al., Integrated Assessment 4: 1, 2003. Integrated Ass J 6(1):83–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz JR (2006) Post-normal science and the complexity of transitions towards sustainability. Ecol Complex 3:275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raza Y (2009) Uncertainty analysis of capacity estimates and leakage potential for geologic storage of carbon dioxide in saline aquifers. Masters Thesis, MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn O, Klinke A (2004) Systemic risks: a new challenge for risk management. EMBO Rep 5(S1):S41–S46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riesch H, Reiner D (submitted) Different levels of uncertainty in carbon capture and storage

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesch H, Spiegelhalter DJ (2011) “Careless pork costs lives”: risk stories from science to press release to media“. Health Risk Soc 13(1):47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeser S (2009) The relation between cognition and affect in moral judgments about risk. In: Asveld L, Roeser S (eds) The ethics of technological risk. Earthscan, London, pp 182–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeser S (2010) Intuitions, emotions an gut reactions in decisions about risks: towards a different interpretation of “neuroethics”. J Risk Res 13(2):175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumsfeld D (2002) Defense.gov News Transcript. http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transc riptid=2636. Accessed 3 Dec 2010

  • Schneider SH, Turner BL, Garriga HM (1998) Imaginable surprise in global change science. J Risk Res 1(2):165–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackley S, Wynne B (1996) Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: boundary-ordering devices and authority. Sci Technol Hum Val 21(3):275–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P (2000) The perception of risk. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P, Finucane M, Peters E, MacGregor D (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk and rationality. Risk Anal 24(2):311–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen R (2009) Epistemic paradoxes. In: Zalta E (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/epistemic-paradoxes/. Accessed 31 Dec 2010

  • Spiegelhalter DJ (2010) Quantifying uncertainty. In: Paper presented at “Handling uncertainty in science”, Royal Society, London, 22–23 Mar 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter DJ, Pearson M (2008) 2845 ways to spin the risk. http://understandinguncertainty.org/node/233. Accessed 31 Dec 2010

  • Spiegelhalter DJ, Riesch H (in press) Don’t know, can’t know: embracing scientific uncertainty when analysing risks. Philos T Roy Soc A

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling A (2007) Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. EMBO Rep 8(4):309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein CR (2005) Laws of fear. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel H (1981) Human groups and social categories: studies in social psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb N (2007) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Upham P, Riesch H, Tomei, J Thornley P (2011) The sustainability of woody biomass supply for UK bioenergy: a post-normal approach to environmental risk and uncertainty. Environ Sci Policy 14(5):510–518

    Google Scholar 

  • van Asselt MBA, Rotmans J (2002) Uncertainty in integrated assessment modelling: from positivism to pluralism. Clim Change 54:75–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker WE, Harremoes P, Rotmans J, van der Sluijs JP, van Asselt MBA, Janssen P, Krayer von Krauss MP (2003) Defining uncertainty: a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integrat Ass 4(1):5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washer P (2004) Representations of SARS in the British newspapers. Soc Sci Med 59:2561–2571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCRF (2007a) Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. WCRF, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • WCRF (2007b) Landmark report: Excess body fat causes cancer. http://www.wcrf-uk.org/press_media/releases/31102007.lasso. Accessed 13 Aug 2008

  • WCRF (2007c) Media quotes. http://www.wcrf-uk.org/press_media/quotes.lasso. Accessed 13 Aug 2008

  • Wynne B (1992) Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environ Chang 2(2):111–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, CB2 1AG, Cambridge, UK

    Dr. Hauke Riesch

Authors
  1. Dr. Hauke Riesch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hauke Riesch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Philosophy Department Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Sabine Roeser

  2. Philosophy Department, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Sabine Roeser

  3. Human Technology Center, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

    Rafaela Hillerbrand

  4. Department of Plant Physiology and Forest Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

    Per Sandin

  5. Section for Philosophy and Ethics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Martin Peterson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Riesch, H. (2012). Levels of Uncertainty. In: Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., Peterson, M. (eds) Handbook of Risk Theory. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1432-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1433-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation